Berto Jongman: Julian Asange on Bush Jr. Library, Bradley Manning Trial

Cultural Intelligence
Berto Jongman
Berto Jongman

Interview: Julian Assange on George Bush’s Library and Bradley Manning’s Trial

Medea Banjamin

OpEdNews.com, 25 April 2013

I had an opportunity to interview WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he has been granted political asylum since June 2012. Assange is wanted for questioning in Sweden over sex allegations, although he has never been charged. Assange believes that if sent to Sweden, he would be put into prison and then sent to the United States, where he is already being investigated for espionage for publishing hundreds of thousands of classified diplomatic and military memos on the WikiLeaks website.

EXTRACTS

Julian Assange
Julian Assange

George W. Bush’s new presidential library at Southern Methodist University in Texas has opened with great fanfare, including the attendance of Presidents Obama and former Presidents Carter, Bush Sr. and Clinton. George Bush has said that the library is “a place to lay out facts.” What facts would you like to see displayed at his library? 

A good place to start would be laying out the number of deaths caused by the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. At Wikileaks, we documented that from 2004-2009, the US had records of over 100,000 individual deaths of Iraqis due to violence unleashed by that invasion, roughly 80% of them civilians. These are the recorded deaths, but many more died. And in Afghanistan, the US recorded about 20,000 deaths from 2004-2010. These would be good facts to include in the presidential library.

And perhaps the library could document how people around the world protested against the invasion of Iraq, including the historic February 15, 2003 mobilization of millions of people around the globe.

. . . . . . . . .

What do you think the trial [of Bradley Manning] will be like? 

It will be a show trial where the government tries to prove that by leaking the documents, Bradley “aided and abetted the enemy” or “communicated with the enemy.” The government will bring in a member of the Navy Seal team that killed bin Laden to say that he found some of the leaked information in bin Laden’s house.

But it’s ridiculous to use that as evidence that Bradley Manning “aided the enemy”. Bin Laden could have gotten the material from The New York Times! Bin Laden also had a Bob Woodword book, and no doubt had copies of articles from The New York Times.

The government doesn’t even claim that Bradley passed information directly to “the enemy” or that he had any intent to do so. But they are nonetheless making the absurd claim that merely informing the public about classified government activities makes someone a traitor because it “indirectly informs the enemy”.

With that reasoning, since bin Laden recommended that Americans read Bob Woodward book Obama’s War, should Woodward be charged with communicating with the enemy? Should The New York Times be accused of aiding the enemy if bin Laden possessed a copy of the newspaper that included the WikiLeaks material?

Read full interview.

Phi Beta Iota:  There is no question but that the US federal government, whatever its good intentions, is marching toward tyranny.  From the Boston lock down and involuntary house to house search and virtual martial law, to the FEMA prisons and FEMA plans for federalizinhg local police, all signs point to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly being “set aside” by the government.  Mayor Bloomberg’s utterly insane comments on needing to ignore the US Constitution are themselves a form of treason.  By this standard, every Libertarian should be locked up without a trial, or quietly executed.

See Also:

DuckDuckGo / Libertarianism

Introducing Libertarianism (Reading List)