Open Mind: Lost Nukes, Fired Generals, Who’s in Charge and Why?

08 Proliferation, 10 Security, 11 Society, DoD, Government, Law Enforcement, Military, Officers Call, Peace Intelligence
0Shares

open source open mindAs I Have Said Before: Things Are NOT What They Seem

Posted: 11 Oct 2013 05:22 PM PDT

The comment on this article, the last sentence which is in red print, is the most telling. This whole article is a good example that proves two things:

1. There is “stuff” really is going on behind the scenes which is being kept secret.

2. It is difficult, if not impossible, to know who the white hats are and who the black hats are. In this case the general(s) who was “fired” might have been fired by the positive military because he was negative military, following cabal orders.  Or he might have been fired by the cabal because he wouldn't follow cabal orders.  We don't know without further information. 

Tom

UPDATED: U.S. major general overseeing nuclear missiles
to be fired – official

Found this PDF… seems to imply the General was in charge of ‘non-kinetic” weaponry aka particle and beam weapons….  in addition to nukes.  -Bill http://www.afspc.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-100825-027.pdf
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/11/usa-nuclear-idUSL1N0I110120131011


U.S. major general overseeing nuclear missiles to be fired -official
Oct 11 (Reuters) – The two-star U.S. general in charge of the Air Force's arsenal of intercontinental missiles will be fired due to “a loss of trust and confidence,” a Pentagon official told Reuters on Friday.The exact reason for the removal of Major General Michael Carey from his job as commander of the 20th Air Force was not immediately clear. But the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, stressed that America's nuclear weapons were safe.

The decision to fire Carey was made by Lieutenant General James Kowalski, commander of the Air Force Global Strike Command, the official said.

Late update:


http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.com/2013/10/top-nuke-commanders-terminated.html

Friday, October 11, 2013
Top Nuke Commanders Terminated Following Missing Nuclear Warheads Report
Anthony Gucciardi
Infowars.com
October 11, 2013

Two of the top nuclear commanders within the United States have now been terminated following the exclusive high level military leak report by Alex Jones and myself regarding the secret and unsigned nuclear weapons transfer from Dyess Air Force base to South Carolina. Disturbingly, the high level suspensions from top generals within the military establishment are not the only red flags to follow the leaked report.

Even before it was announced that the second highest nuke commander in the United States was suspended on the same day of the secret nuke transfer just weeks later, it was Senator Lindsey Graham who went on record hours after our report in saying that a ‘nuclear attack’ could come to South Carolina in the event that we did not move militarily against Syria and Iran — pushing even harder to action against both Iran and Syria. This alone generated hundreds of thousands to view our video reports and millions to examine our reports, which had immediately gone from concerning high level military intelligence to an international topic.

But now, even after we had Lindsey Graham warn against a nuclear strike in the exact region we told you the nuclear warheads were being transfered without a paper trail, we have the absolute highest level military nuke commanders being removed. But what’s more, the terminations were not meant to be leaked — especially not the fact that the suspension of the #2 in command was issued on the exact day of the nuke transfer.

From a report in the Daily Mail over the suspension of the second highest nuke commander in the country, we read how the commander was suspended on the exact same day as the transfer:
“Kunze said Strategic Command did not announce the Sept. 3 suspension because Giardina remains under investigation and action on Kehler’s recommendation that Giardina be reassigned is pending. The suspension was first reported by the Omaha World-Herald.”

It is also revealed in the mainstream media reports that the government did not want these suspensions and firings to go on record, and that it was an anonymous government insider who provided leaked emails to the Associated Press:

“An internal email obtained by the AP on Friday said the allegations against Carey stem from an inspector general probe of his behavior while on an unspecified ‘temporary duty assignment.’ The email said the allegations are not related to the operational readiness of the ICBM force or recent failed inspections of ICBM units.”

What this means is that the nuke commanders were terminated behind the scenes in a move that was not meant to hit the public eye — especially not the fact that the second in command was fired on the same day of the leaked nuclear transfer. More importantly, shedding light on the secret transfer of nuclear weapons and the numerous red flags that prove its validity is key in stopping the psychopathic control freaks in government from going through with Graham’s ‘warnings’ of a nuclear explosion that would lead to a war with Syria.

The highest level generals have now installed a new commander, Pentagon Air Force Commander Jack Weinstein, who may be willing to do the bidding of higher ups that the previous two nuke commanders would not. [or the opposite, two ways to look at this… need more data…notice it was the Pentagon who fired him, not Barak Obama. ]

Financial Liberty at Risk-728x90




liberty-risk-dark