Robert Parry: Jonathan Marshall on US Arms Makers Inciting a New Cold War

Corruption, Military
Robert Parry
Robert Parry

US Arms Makers Invest in a New Cold War

Behind the U.S. media-political clamor for a new Cold War with Russia is a massive investment by the Military-Industrial Complex in “think tanks” and other propaganda outlets, writes Jonathan Marshall.

Think tanks like the Lexington Institute are prime movers behind the domestic propaganda campaign to revive the Cold War against the diminished Russian state and justify weapons programs like the F-35.

As Lee Fang observed recently in The Intercept, “The escalating anti-Russian rhetoric in the U.S. presidential campaign comes in the midst of a major push by military contractors to position Moscow as a potent enemy that must be countered with a drastic increase in military spending by NATO countries.”

Thus the Lockheed-funded Aerospace Industries Association warns that the Obama administration is failing to spend enough on “aircraft, ship and ground combat systems” to adequately address “Russian aggression on NATO’s doorstep.” The Lockheed- and Pentagon-funded Center for European Policy Analysis issues a stream of alarmist reports about Russian military threats to Eastern Europe.

And the highly influential Atlantic Council — funded by Lockheed-Martin, Raytheon, the U.S. Navy, Army, Air Force, Marines, and even the Ukrainian World Congress — promotes articles like “Why Peace is Impossible with Putin” and declares that NATO must “commit to greater military spending” to deal with “a revanchist Russia.”

Read full article.

Click on Image to Enlarge
Click on Image to Enlarge

Phi Beta Iota: The dishonesty of all concerned is troubling. The Pentagon wastes between 45% (weapons acquisition) and 75% (Afghanistan) of every tax-payer dollar. The “budget share” approach to service expenditures is unprofessional and deeply harmful to the public interest. The US Air Force and US Navy are letting companies like Lockheed Martin (F-35) and Northrup Grumman (USS Gerald Ford) cheat the public with impunity. The infantry of the US Army and US Marine Corps comprise 4% of the force, take 80% of the casualties, and receive 1% of the total Pentagon budget. This is outrageous. We are long over-due for a responsible Grand Strategy, an appreciation of Global Reality, and a complete rebalancing of the instruments of national power.

See Especially:

2008 Rebalancing the Instruments of National Power–Army Strategy Conference of 2008 Notes, Summary, & Article

2008 Rebalancing the Instruments of National Power (Full Text Online for Google Translate)

Marcus Aurelius: CSA Reflects on Whole of Government Deficiencies — Military Best for Strong on Strong, Not Strong on Weak

Robert Steele: Reinventing the US Army Part I – An American Grand Strategy

Robert Steele: Reinventing the US Army Part II – Overview of Planning and Programming Factors for Expeditionary Army Operations

Worth a Look: The Golden Hour and Rebalancing the Instruments of National Power

See Also:

F-35 @ Phi Beta Iota

Mongoose: Northrup Grumman Screws Up a $13 Billion Dollar New Carrier — Indictable Crimes?