Patrick Cockburn: Hazards of Revolution — and Counter-Revolution

Cultural Intelligence, Peace Intelligence
0Shares
Patrick Cockburn
Patrick Cockburn

Hazards of Revolution

Patrick Cockburn

London Review of Books, 9 January 2014

EXTRACTS:

Why have oppositions in the Arab world and beyond failed so absolutely, and why have they repeated in power, or in pursuit of it, so many of the faults and crimes of the old regimes? The contrast between humanitarian principles expressed at the beginning of revolutions and the bloodbath at the end has many precedents, from the French Revolution on. But over the last twenty years in the Middle East, the Balkans and the Caucasus the rapid degradation of what started as mass uprisings has been particularly striking.

. . . . . . .

The inability of new governments across the Middle East to end the violence can be ascribed to a simple-minded delusion that most problems would vanish once democracies had replaced the old police states. Opposition movements, persecuted at home and often living a hand to mouth existence in exile, half-believed this and it was easy to sell to foreign sponsors. A great disadvantage of this way of seeing things was that Saddam, Assad and Gaddafi were so demonised it became difficult to engineer anything approaching a compromise or a peaceful transition from the old to a new regime.

. . . . . . .

Click on Image to Enlarge
Click on Image to Enlarge

So the insurgencies in the Middle East face immense difficulties, and they have faltered, stalled, been thrown on the defensive or apparently defeated. But without the rest of the world noticing, one national revolution in the region is moving from success to success.

Read full article.

See Also:

REVOLUTION Graphic & Refs

Revolution @ Phi Beta Iota

Financial Liberty at Risk-728x90




liberty-risk-dark