Anna von Reitz: Is Uniform Commercial Code Being Hijacked?

Commerce, Commercial Intelligence, Corruption, Cultural Intelligence, Earth Intelligence, Government

Phi Beta Iota: Weak signals of continuing subversion of the US Congress which has in the past been complicit in all manner of Wall Street crimes against the public. The Uniform Commercial Code may have just been re-defined to allow banks to seize assets from individuals who have lost everything because of bank fraud.

See below for a comment and links from Anna von Reitz.

They are trying to rewrite their contractual obligations to all of us by making up new legal terms and changing the Uniform Commercial Code after the fact.

They are trying to claim that the banks invested in us and our assets when in fact they solicited our investments in them under false advertisement and cheated us out of any equitable

They are trying to pull this off right in front of our faces using another “legal” sleight of hand when we have been owed lawful contracting processes throughout.

Prior to 2015 when we brought our first international claims and Notices they were operating under one version of Article 9 and after 2015 they changed Article 9 to try to benefit themselves again and now this—- third strike.

Please publish this far and wide together with the fact that we do not accept their offer and are grandfathered in and do not accept any new interpretation of Article 9 recognizing the banks as investors in our assets nor do we agree to any representation of us.

We are here to settle our own scores with the banks and we note that we own all incorporated entities worldwide that have been chartered under our delegated authority.

The vermin just changed the Law/legal Definition AGAIN, now on UCC § 9-607 – 9-610 to a NEW term “Investment control”. The Banks did not investment anything in people, they only extract -ed all people assets, HJR192 credits, $IOU’s, Trust, Bond, Gold, Slavery fund, etc:

Cornell.edu just changed the legal definition of the UCc 9-607… to Investment Control. Below is the old or current definitions:

§ 9-607. COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT BY SECURED …
www.law.cornell.edu › ucc › 9-607
APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS OF COLLECTION OR ENFORCEMENT; LIABILITY FOR DEFICIENCY AND RIGHT TO SURPLUS. › Uniform Commercial Code …

U.C.C. – ARTICLE 9 – SECURED TRANSACTIONS (2010 …
www.law.cornell.edu › ucc
9-607. COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT BY SECURED PARTY. § 9-608. APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS OF COLLECTION OR ENFORCEMENT; LIABILITY …

1309.607. (UCC 9-607) Collection and enforcement by …
law.justia.com › jd_1309607-581d
(UCC 9-607) Collection and enforcement by secured party. (A) If so agreed, and in any event after default, a secured party: (1)

Uniform Commercial Code § 9-607. Collection and …
advance.lexis.com › lpadocument
Uniform Commercial Code § 9-607. Collection and Enforcement by Secured Party, NY CLS UCC § 9-607. Summary. (a) Collection and enforcement generally.

Opt in for free daily update from this free blog. Separately The Steele Report ($11/mo) offers weekly text report and live webinar exclusive to paid subscribers, who can also ask questions of Robert. Or donate to ask questions directly of Robert.