Journal: Steele on Integrity and the Secretary of Defense Specifically

Ethics, Military
Robert Steele
Robert Steele

In the notional conversation below,  Robert Steele first defends the Secretary of Defense in the context of a White House that is insanely criminal or criminally insane, and then outlines the other position, one rooted in the Constitution and the inviolate nature of Integrity as the foundation for a Republic Of, By, and For We the People.

Robert Gates as Victim

Gates was not and is not the problem.  The problem on this is specifically in the White House and NSC.  Gates is doing his best, but probably wishes he had not agreed to stay on. I don't understand what you've got against Gates.  Every military person I respect thinks the world of him.  The complaints are about the WH crowd.  Gates is trying to make things work–despite the WH.

Robert Gates as Enabler

Gates is an enabler.  Powell left his integrity at home and allowed Cheney to commit high crimes and misdemeanors, now Gates (and Jones) are doing the same thing.  Loyalty is NOT what we swear an oath to.  The Constitution is ABOVE the slime in the White House and on the Hill.

My point is that the absolute most important duty of anyone who swears an Oath to defend the CONSTITUTION is to refuse illegal orders.  I believe that the order to gag McChrystal on needing more troops is an illegal order, a high crime, an impeachable offense, and if Gates “goes along” as Colin Powell “went along” with the 25 high crimes and 935 lies of Dick Cheney, then Gates is —  however good and intelligent a man he might be – himself guilty of an impeachable offense.  This is crystal clear to me.

Financial Liberty at Risk-728x90