USG Breathtakingly Irresponsible on Banks

Who, Me?

The Baseline Scenario

Dividend Lost

by Simon Johnson

Four types of people were directly affected by the Federal Reserve’s decision at the end of last week to allow major banks to increase their dividends and to buy back shares.  Three of these groups – bankers, bank shareholders, and government officials – were somewhere between happy and delighted.  The four group, US taxpayers, should be much more worried (see also this cautionary letter to the Financial Times by top finance academics).

The bankers’ reaction is obvious.  They are officially released from the financial hospital ward that was set up for them in 2008.  No matter that this was a very comfortable place with few conditions relative to any other bailout in recent US or world history – there were still restrictions on what banks could do and, naturally, bank executives chafed at these constraints.

In particular, banks were required to build up the equity in their business – insolvency is avoided, after all, while there is positive equity in a business.  When shareholder equity is exhausted, creditors face losses. Read more….

See Also:

13 Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown.

Phi Beta Iota: The disingeneous will observe the Federal Reserve is neither Federal nor a Reserve, and they are correct.  However, the complicity of the USG going back to Bill Clinton is breathtakingly irresponsible.  Merely airing the truth and assuring public outrage would be salutory.

Opt in for free daily update from this free blog. Separately The Steele Report ($11/mo) offers weekly text report and live webinar exclusive to paid subscribers, who can also ask questions of Robert. Or donate to ask questions directly of Robert.