2013 Open Source Agency: Executive Access Point 2.1
SUPERCEDED by 2020 Smart Nation Vision – By Invitation
SUPERCEDED by 2020 Smart Nation Vision – By Invitation
Butts in seats would be a good place to start in most cases….. A golden decade for defense companies is ending Associated Press, 15 August 2011 NEW YORK – The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are winding down, Osama bin Laden is dead, and the federal government is deeply in debt. This spells the end …
Continue reading “DefDog: Defense Entitlement Comes to An End….”
The Cold War Part 2, revisiting a failed strategy….. Good closing paragraph in the story…… The Pentagon’s new China war plan Despite budget woes, the military is preparing for a conflict with our biggest rival — and we should be worried This summer, despite America’s continuing financial crisis, the Pentagon is effectively considering trading two …
Continue reading “DefDog: The Pentagon’s new China war plan”
This search probably refers to the new “air IED” believed to be used to bring down the old slow chopper in AF. It appears to have originated in Iraq, but we have no doubt that Iran for the Shi’ites and Pakistan for the Sunni are both thinking of how to create asymmetries in technology that …
Continue reading “Search: the weapon and ammunition with full anal”
You Want Chicken Pox with That? EXTRACT The story of what might be called the ghost of chicken pox future starts with Najlaa International Catering Services (NICS), a KBR contractor, headquartered in Kuwait. NICS was solicited by KBR in the spring of 2008 to provide a Request for Proposal (RFP) for approximately 32 Dining Facilities …
It is amazing that the L.A. Times would publish this story. Maybe even the ‘lame stream media’ is starting to wake up to the foolishness of the MICC. High costs, malfunctions plague F-22 Raptor fighter jets W. J. Hennigan Los Angeles Times, 6 August 2011 The fleet of 158 F-22 planes — costing $412 million …
Continue reading “Richard Wright: F-22 Raptor Goes Under the Bus”
My good friend Pierre Sprey took issue with my characterization of Steven Walt’s critique of US grand strategy as being excellent subject to two omissions. Attached herewith are Pierre’s comments — they are spot on, and I stand corrected on my characterization of “excellent” … or perhaps more accurately … I stand clearly and fairly …