Richard Wright: Reflections on NATO Commentary — US Needs to Drop Down to Observer Status with Russia — Steele Comments

Architecture, Culture, Governance, Innovation, P2P / Panarchy, Politics, Resilience, Sources (Info/Intel), Transparency
Richard Wright
Richard Wright

I think your thought piece on NATO is excellent, but somewhat incomplete.  NATO is the diplomatic and administrative headquarters, but the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) is the actual C2 for NATO military operations

In my opinion, the U.S. needs to back out of NATO and its operational counter part SHAPE and leave both to the EU (as you suggest).  The U.S. could join Russia in an observer status at NATO, but would no longer be a voting member.  Both NATO and SHAPE would be under the EU, but would include non-EU members (e.g. Turkey).

This would do two beneficial things: it would provide Europe with a dedicated all European military force; and it would facilitate the move towards greater integration of EU member countries.

The benefits to the U.S. would also be significant by forcing the U.S. to recognize that the Cold War is over and there is no longer any reason to have a major U.S. Military presence in Germany (Italy is another matter given its proximity to the still volatile Maghreb)

I think that your proposal for a dedicated EU-NATO Intelligence Organization is absolutely brilliant, but again I would add a second intelligence entity to SHAPE for support to military operations (SMO). Both of these organizations would be all European.

I too am a non-player in the power games inside the DC Beltway. If I had any influence you would not be unemployed.  Frankly I believe that the executive and legislative branches of the U.S. Government have lost interest in governing this country and are just going through the motions. So expecting the U.S. to take the initiative with NATO is fruitless.

Susan Rice is a brilliant and effective woman who I suspect will be ignored by President Obama, just as he ignored the super competent General Jones (who I became acquainted with when he headed the U.S. DOD Delegation at NATO).

Keep fighting the good fight!
Richard (AKA Retired Reader)

Robert David STEELE Vivas
Robert David STEELE Vivas

ROBERT STEELE:  Neither the USA nor the EU nor NATO understand “hybrid governance” at this time nor do they want to for the simple reason that hybrid governance demands intelligence with integrity.  Information and intelligence are the means by which an infinite combination of partnerships can be formed, maintained or dissolved, modified, etcetera.  That’s called transformation.

See Also:

2013 Robert Steele: Concise Summary of Three Paths to a Prosperous World at Peace

2013 Robert Steele Answers on OSINT to PhD Student in Denmark 2.0

2013 Healing the Americas with an Open Source Agency

2013 Robert Steele: $500 Million to Resettle 1 Million on a Moonscape with Sun, Dirt, & Salt Water….Exploring the Practical Edge of Intelligence with Integrity — Call for Substantive Ideas 2.0 Habitat Cost Sheet Posted

Berto Jongman: Human Security as Paradigm for Hybrid Governance

Berto Jongman: US Special Operations Command Goal — Prevent Wars, Bottom Up Community Based Resilience — Never Mind Strategic-Level Blunders, Ideology, & Predatory Policies, Drones, Dictators…1.1

Graphic: Holistic Mind-Shift Toward Hybrid Public Governance of the Whole by the Whole for the Whole

Graphic: Public Governance & Feedback Loop Integrity Enhanced by Public Intelligence

Intelligence with Integrity Chapter 1: Public Governance & Public Intelligence

INTELLIGENCE with INTEGRITY: Chapter 5 Systems Thinking & True Cost Economics

NATO OSINT to OSE/M4IS2 Round-Up 2.0

Public Intelligence 3.7

SchwartzReport: Costs of (Allegedly) Hunting Terrorists versus (Alleged) Benefits of a Police State

Search: phd topics on the role of intelligence in peace support operation + Peacekeeping RECAP

Stuart Umpleby: “Ambidextrous Organization”

Yoda: Integral Science Is the Force — Joining Intelligence with Integrity