David Isenberg: The True Cost (Locally) of Military Strikes Against Iranian Nuclear Targets + Iran Nuclear Meta-RECAP

05 Iran, 08 Wild Cards, Corruption, IO Deeds of War, Military
David Isenberg

The Myth of “Surgical Strikes” on Iran

By David Isenberg

TIME Battleland | October 18, 2012

For all the years that the world has focused on the confrontation between Western nations and Iran, oceans of ink have been spilled over many aspects of its nuclear program — the quantity and quality of its enriched uranium, various UN Security Council resolutions, the number of Iranian centrifuges, IAEA safeguards, compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty, diplomatic negotiations, red lines, U.S. and Israeli attack scenarios, possible Iranian responses, the impact of a nuclear Iran, and so on.

Yet, almost nothing has been written about one critical factor: the impact on Iranian civilians, if the U.S. and/or the Israelis were to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities.

That vacuum has now been filled, thanks to a recent lengthy report — The Ayatollah’s Nuclear Gamble: The Human Cost of Military Strikes Against Iran’s Nuclear Facilities. It was authored by Khosrow Semnani, an Iranian-American industrialist and philanthropist with extensive experience in the industrial management of nuclear waste and chemicals.

The University of Utah’s Hinckley Institute of Politics and Omid for Iran, a nonprofit organization based in Salt Lake City, Utah, published the assessment. Author Semnani has provided support for conferences and educational initiatives in the United States.

The report examined various military options against different sites but regardless – perhaps it shouldn’t come as a surprise — the news was horrifyingly bad for Iraqi civilians. Iran insists its nuclear-development efforts are for peaceful purposes, and that it has no desire to build atomic weapons.

According to the report:

It is highly likely that the casualty rate at the physical sites will be close to 100 percent. Assuming an average two-shift operation, between 3,500 and 5,500 people would be present at the time of the strikes, most of whom would be killed or injured as a result of the physical and thermal impact of the blasts. If one were to include casualties at other targets, one could extrapolate to other facilities, in which case the total number of people killed and injured could exceed 10,000.

The report analyzed the impact of pre-emptive conventional strikes on four key nuclear sites: Isfahan’s uranium conversion facility, which contains an estimated 371 metric tons of uranium hexafluoride; Natanz’s fuel-enrichment plant; Arak’s heavy-water plant; and Bushehr’s nuclear power plant.

The report did not include the deeply-buried Fordow site near Qom in its analysis, but it is almost certain that Fordow would be targeted with powerful bunker busters.

To the extent that war planners would consider “collateral damage,” the euphemism for civilian casualties as a factor the news is grim. “There is no viable military option for dealing with Iran’s nuclear challenge,” the report concludes. “Iran has built its nuclear facilities in major urban centers making it impossible to carry out surgical strikes without killing large number of civilians.”

The eventual toll, however, could well be more than 10,000 dead. For example, attacks at Isfahan and Natanz would release existing stocks of fluorine and fluorine compounds which would turn into hydrofluoric acid — a highly-reactive agent that, when inhaled, would make people “drown in their lungs.” Fluorine gases are more corrosive and toxic than the chlorine gas used in World War I. Once airborne, at lethal concentrations, these toxic plumes could kill virtually all life forms in their path.

Aside from the fluorine, the uranium hexafluoride itself also poses dire consequences. The report estimates that if only 5% of 371 metric tons of uranium hexafluoride produced at the Isfahan facility becomes airborne during or after an attack, the toxic plumes could travel five miles with the Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) level of 25 milligrams per cubic liter spreading over 13 square miles:

With prevailing wind directions and speeds at 9.4 miles/hour moving towards the city, in about one hour, this plume could expose some of the 240,000 residents in Isfahan municipality’s eastern districts, particularly districts 4 and 6. At a 20% release, the IDLH plume will travel 9 miles covering 41 square miles and could expose some of the 352,000 residents, mainly in districts 13, 4, and 6, as well as residents in the region north of district 4. If we assume a conservative casualty rate of 5 to 20% among these populations, we can expect casualties in the range of 12,000-70,000 people. [emphasis in original]

Such scenarios are even worse than catastrophes like the 1984 gas leak in Bhopal, India, or the 1986 nuclear meltdown at Chernobyl, Ukraine. And, like Chernobyl, the effects could be long-lasting. The environmental degradation due to the spread of airborne uranium compounds, and their entry into water, soil and the food chain, would likely introduce long-term, chronic health risks, including spikes in cancer rates and birth defects.

Not only that: an attack on Iran’s nuclear sites could prove contagious. “An attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant would pose a grave environmental and economic threat to civilians in Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Saudi Arabia,” the report said. “It would not only devastate the important business centers and fishing communities of the Persian Gulf, but also contaminate desalination plants, port facilities and oil fields.”

Some thoughts worth pondering, next time you hear the words “Iran,” “nuclear,” and “surgical strikes” traveling in close formation.

Phi Beta Iota:  The 935 now-documented lies that led to the three-trillion dollar war on Iraq — and the Fallujah mutant babies  — are being replicated on a smaller scale with respect to Iran.  At some point the governments in favor of war will achieve total moral and financial bankruptcy — that appears to be the necessary precondition for public mobilization against organized money.

See Also:

Abolala Soudavar: Alternative Jewish Perspective on Iran

Berto Jongman: Debka Alternative – Iranian Drone Big as a Helicopter, Captured Intact, Revealed Huge Gaps in Israeli Air Defense

Berto Jongman: Ha’aretz on Who Will Decide on War with Iran?

Berto Jongman: Missing Nukes Fuel Terror Concern

Chuck Spinney: Analysis of Cost of Neo-Con Idiocy on Iran

Chuck Spinney: Bombing Iran . . . Soon

Chuck Spinney: Egyptian President Trumps Egyptian Military; Egypt, Turkey, and Iran Will Trump NATO Militarism

Chuck Spinney: Iranian Plot a Sting, False Flag, or Both?

Chuck Spinney: Is Israel on Cusp of Grand Strategic Set-Back as Universities Mobilize (Precedent South Africa)?

Chuck Spinney: Israel, Not Iran, is Central Threat in Middle East

Chuck Spinney: No War with Iran, Settlements Open Game?

Chuck Spinney: Obama & Netanyabua — Scorpions in a Bottle

Chuck Spinney: Should We Fear Nuclear Iran or Nuclear Israel?

Chuck Spinney: Smart Iranians, Neutral Americans, Fearful Jews, Idiot Zionists….

Chuck Spinney: The Iranian War Fraud

Chuck Spinney: Today’s Good News – Netanyahu Back in His Box (Temporarily)

Chuck Spinney: War Drums Beat within Versailles on the Potomac — War with Iran Promoted — More Lies and Miscalculation

David Isenberg: Thomas Powers on Ike Eisenhower – He Got the Big Things Right

David Swanson: Deep Insights Into MICC Misbehavior Focus on Lockheed, Boeing, Northrup Grumman, General Dynamics

David Swanson: Lies and Consequences Across 15 Wars

David Swanson: Obama OK on Israel Nuking Iran — AFTER the November 2012 Election

David Swanson: Veterans for Peace Call for End to NATO

DefDog: IAEA Veteran’s Letter “No Iran Bomb” Being Ignored

DefDog: Pentagon: sabotaging U.S. computers is an act of war against U.S. – but Iran cannot hold Stuxnet against US….

DefDog: War with Iran? Opening Pandora’s Box!

Dolphin: Stuxnet – Throwing Rocks When You Live in a Glass House!

Eagle: Israel Funds MKO; MKO Funds US Politicians

Eagle: Israel / Jews Discuss Assassination of Obama

Gold Master: SWIFT Against Iran – Huge Mistake, Now SWIFT At Risk

Gordon Duff: Nuclear Theft / Threat from Germany or Donation to Israel for Use Against Iran, Others?

Gordon Duff: Obama Assassination Legal Under Torah / Israeli Law? False Flag Nuclear Hit on Chicago? Bio-War on Poor? + Israel Atrocity and False Flag RECAP

James Wall: Israel to Palestine is as Britain to Slavery – “Throw Their Dirty Little Ships Out of the Water” — Tide Turning Against Israeli Atrocities

John Robb: Global “Heart Attack” from Oil Disruption

John Robb: War with Iran Very, Very Close

Josh Kilbourn: Armada of British naval power massing in the Gulf as Israel prepares an Iran strike

Josh Kilbourn: Dollar Disappearing, US Sidelined on Syria / Iran

Josh Kilbourn: War Against Iran Has Been Underway

Marcus Aurelius: Azerbaijan, Israel, US, Iran, & Russia – a Look at “Ground Zero” for Old Ways of Spying

Mini-Me: Dr. Steve Pieczenik on War in Middle East from 25 September 2012 – Jim Fetzer Reports Plus Interview & Links

Mini-Me: Iran? False Flag Car Bombings – A Mossad Specialty

Mini-Me: Iranian Plot or False Flag Fraud?

Mini-Me: Iran Is NOT a Nuclear Threat — Cover for Other Actions

Mini-Me: Smoking Gun Documents on Iran From Israel Mossad?

Mini-Me: Veteran’s Today Warns of False Flag Terror in US End of May — Russians Exercising in US Around NORTHCOM with Mission to Take and Hold Denver Airport…G-8 Moved to Camp David

NIGHTWATCH: Iran – Turkey – Brazil Nuclear Axis


NIGHTWATCH: Push-Back on US Across AF PK IR SY

NIGHTWATCH: SWIFT Banking Attack on Iran

NIGHTWATCH: Syria, Iran, and the Regional Context

NIGHTWATCH: Syria, Russia, US, Iran, Israel, Lies, & Truth + RECAP

Paul Craig Roberts: Washington Leads World Into Lawlessness

Penguin: Global Covert Campaign to Undermine Obama – Who, Exactly, Is Doing What?

Penguin: US/UK Perpetuate Soviet False Flag Model + Meta-RECAP

Ralph Peters: Testimony to Congress on Pakistan As a Failing Empire, Focus on Baluchistan

Review: Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War

Richard Wright: Washington Post – No Memory on Iraq & No Integrity on Iran

Search: integrity [as of 5 Oct 2012]

Susan Lindauer: IRAQ – The Legacy of Deception and Its Costs

Tom Atlee: Letter to a Peace Activist — CHANGE the Game!

Winslow Wheeler: Facts on US Military “Superiority”

Yoda: When Intelligence Loses It’s Integrity, It Is Not Intelligence

Financial Liberty at Risk-728x90