Around 2:15 he refers to news about perverts and pedos taking advantage of the pro-LGBT laws to assault women in bathrooms, and some Colorado girls are being threatened with hate crime charges for objecting to men coming into the girl’s restrooms. Now all a pedo/pervert has to do is dress up as a woman, claim his identity is really that of a woman, and then legally enter female restrooms to wack off or sexually attack women, and the law and rock-and-roll star Bruce Springsteen, among others, will still fully back his “right” to enter a woman’s restroom.
More details and many links below the fold.
Owl: The idea that sexual deviates – whether “straights” pretending to be transgendered women or sociopathic transgendered individuals whose sexual desires swings both ways, to males of females or children, would use pro-LGBHT laws to position themselves to sexually attack or harass adults and children, especially women, is not speculative, nor unprecedented, as demonstrated by these many articles below:
“I am not saying that transgender people are predators. Not by a long shot. What I am saying is that there are countless deviant men in this world who will pretend to be transgender as a means of gaining access to the people they want to exploit, namely women and children. It already happens. Just Google Jason Pomares, Norwood Smith Burnes, or Taylor Buehler, for starters. While I feel a deep sense of empathy for what must be a very difficult situation for transgender people, at the beginning and end of the day, it is nothing short of negligent to instate policies that elevate the emotional comfort of a relative few over the physical safety of a large group of vulnerable people. Don’t they know anything about predators? Don’t they know the numbers? That out of every 100 rapes, only two rapists will spend so much as single day in jail while the other 98 walk free and hang out in our midst? Don’t they know that predators are known to intentionally seek out places where many of their preferred targets gather in groups? That perpetrators are addicts so committed to their fantasies they’ll stop at nothing to achieve them? Do they know that more than 99 percent of single-victim incidents are committed by males? That they are experts in rationalization who minimize their number of victims? Don’t they know that insurance companies highlight locker rooms as a high-risk area for abuse that should be carefully monitored and protected?…Why would people knowingly invite further exploitation by creating policies with no safeguards in place to protect them from injury? With zero screening options to ensure that biological males who enter locker rooms actually identify as female, how could a woman be sure the person staring at her wasn’t exploiting her? Why is it okay to make her wonder?”
This article provides a summary history – naming many names and details – of male sexual predators using anti-discrimination laws to prey on women:
“Clearly, genuine transgender people are not the issue here. Rather, the concern lies in the ambiguities created by ‘bathroom laws” that could result in horrific consequences for women and children at the hands of sexual predators. Under many gender-neutral ‘bathroom laws,’ a man who is not actually a transgender can claim to identify as a female and access a ladies bathroom or locker room. In fact, even worse has already happened in Seattle, where a man who did not even make an effort to disguise himself as a transgender entered a women’s locker room and began to undress. When women in the room tried to kick him out, he responded by saying, “the law has changed and I have a right to be here.”
The man was not punished and again entered the locker room later that day while little girls were changing for swim practice.”
Transgender people may be indeed, the issue, in some instances, as illustrated by this observation: “Of all the men to permit in a girl’s locker room, one might argue that “transgenders” ought to be last on the list. Remember Lila Perry, the male “transgender” Missouri high school student who demanded, and was granted, the right to change and use the toilet with girls? A look at his own social media postings reveal that he is attracted to females (and males), and enjoys taking pictures of himself simulating explicit sexual acts. What sort of parent wouldn’t be concerned about a vulgar, hypersexual boy like that using the locker room with their daughter? What sort of government claims that a boy like that has a civil right to infringe on the privacy and security of girls?”