Category: Journal ISSN 1078-1935

Y Worlds is an exploratory initiative, in the Buckminster Fuller tradition, led by Alan Yelsey, co-creator of Machine Dreams and Lumi Mobile.

Visual Y

Visual Y is our system of knowledge visualization. Visual Y consists of:

• a systemic computer based hardware and software architecture capable of running large scale, interactive, real time, generative modeling worlds via a web browser
• a generative engine capable of supporting coders, designers, editors and end users
• an immersive visual approach to generative programming that enables a pattern builder to use design tools to craft the desired multivariate pattern in real time onscreen. The implemented patterns, static or dynamic, then automatically generate sets and subsets of code segments that are stored and tagged in a knowledge/code model. The code is the database or references a database table. A pattern time sequence is not a stored movie.  It is a real time browser based code set launched through interactive controls.

The Heart’s Intuitive Intelligence—

a path to personal, social and global coherence

The NEW video is an overview of the amazing and vital role of the heart in our lives, and how our personal energetics shapes our social relationships and ultimately affects global consciousness.

VIDEO HOME PAGE

I think religious fundamentalism ought to be considered a mental illness. Inevitably, and without exception across the globe, it always involves a deep sexual dysfunctionality and a compulsion to suppress and control women.

4 Ways Conservatives Are Fighting to Control Women's Sex Lives
KATIE MCDONOUGH – AlterNet (U.S.)

Republicans are fighting to keep women from accessing birth control.

Mainstream news outlets are still running editorials chastising women for having sex before marriage.

Abstinence-only education ties girls’ worth to their virginity.

Police departments and others in the criminal justice system blame victims of sexual assault for the violence committed against them.

Huh?

Venture capitalist in bid to split California into six states

Feb 20 (Reuters) – A venture capitalist seeking to break California into six new states has won approval to begin collecting signatures needed to get his plan on the ballot in November, but experts said such a measure likely stands little chance of success.

The proposal, which would also require approval by the U.S. Congress, would split California into six new states called Jefferson, North California, Silicon Valley, Central California, West California and South California.

Under the plan, Los Angeles and Santa Barbara would be part of “West California,” while San Francisco and San Jose would be in “Silicon Valley.”

“California, as it is, is ungovernable,” proponent Tim Draper, founder of the venture capital firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson, said in a statement released by his office on Thursday.

“It is more and more difficult for Sacramento to keep up with the social issues from the various regions of California. With six Californias, people will be closer to their state governments and states can get a refresh,” Draper said.

California Secretary of State Debra Bowen said on Tuesday that the proposal needs the signatures of 807,615 registered voters by July 14 to qualify as a ballot measure in November's elections.

Read full article.

Continue reading “Mini-Me: California to Split Into Six States, What Next? The Plan…”

Why You Can't Keep a Secret

EXTRACT

All of that mental exertion might actually wear a body down: research shows an association between keeping an emotionally charged secret and ailments ranging from the common cold to chronic diseases [3]. Other evidence in favor of disclosure includes multiple studies showing that writing about a traumatic experience can boost the immune system [4], and the finding that teens who confide in a parent or close friend report fewer physical complaints and less delinquent behavior, loneliness, and depression than those who sit on their secrets

Read full article.

Continue reading “Berto Jongman: Secrecy & Madness”

How Technology Killed the Future

Presidents—and the rest of us—can’t get anything done anymore.

By DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF

January 15, 2014

EXTRACT

This new paradigm is fundamentally scrambling our politics. Our leaders’ ability to articulate goals, organize movements or even approach long-term solutions has been stymied by an obsession—on their part and ours—with the now. Unless we adapt to this new presentism, and soon, we may edge more dangerously close to political paralysis.

. . . . . . .

Our relationship with social and political movements is changing much the same way. Gone are the days when we could follow a charismatic leader on an ends-justify-the-means journey toward a clear goal. A person like Martin Luther King Jr. wouldn’t be able to rally people to realize his great dream today. He would be as desperate for hourly retweets as the rest of us, gathering “likes” from followers on Facebook as a substitute for marching with them. Imagine John F. Kennedy attempting to rally national support for a decade-long race to the moon? The extreme present is not an environment conducive to building lasting movements.

Read full article.