
A Propaganda Windfall for the Imperial State: Steven Pinker on the Decline of Violence
Steven Pinkerโs new book, The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined, is a propaganda windfall for the leaders and supporters of the U.S. imperial state, currently engaged in multiple wars, with over 800 military bases across the globe, asserting and using the right to kill untried โterroristsโ any place on earth and still operating a torture gulag abroad and a record-breaking and abusive prison system at home.
It is not surprising that the New York Times greeted the book so warmly, with a flattering front-page Sunday book review by the philosopher Peter Singer, who called Pinkerโs tome โsupremely importantโ and a โmasterly achievementโ (October 9, 2011), along with other positive responses.
It reminds me of the welcome given Claire Sterlingโs The Terror Network in 1981, a book that fit so well with the Reagan administrationโs attempt to demonize the Soviet Union, with the Soviets allegedly behind the worldโs terrorists (who included Nelson Mandela and his ANC, as well as any other resistance movements in the Third World). Sterlingโs book was an intellectual disaster and fraud (see the critique in my Real Terror Network), but it was lauded by Reagan era officials and very respectfully treated in the mainstream media.
Pinker works the same track as Sterling. He swallows whole the old โcontainmentโ model in which U.S. policy from 1945 was designed to limit the expansionism of the Soviets and China (โThe Cold War was the product of the determination of the United States to contain this movement [of the two great Communist powers] at something close to its boundaries at the end of World War IIโ). Even the huge Vietnam war death toll was, for Pinker, a result of the โfanaticalโ unwillingness of the Vietnamese to surrender to superior force. (โThe three deadliest postwar conflicts were fueled by Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese communist regimes that had a fanatical dedication to outlasting their opponents.โ) This is pretty crude apolo- getics for aggression and mass killing.
There is a major problem for Pinker in the brute facts of a massive postwar global expansion of the United States, its immense military budget, all those bases, NATOโs steady enlargement, and its taking on of โout of areaโ responsibilities, all despite the disappearance of the main power allegedly needing containment (the Soviet Union).
In three major books during the past decade (Blowback, Sorrows of Empire, and Nemesis) analyst Chalmers Johnson has featured, at length, our โcontinuous military buildup since World War II and the 737 military bases we maintain in other peopleโs countriesโ; the fact that โblowback,โ including events like 9/11, is a response to imperial expansion and violence, and that โmore than in most past empires, a well-entrenched military lies at the heart of our imperial adventures.โ
Pinker deals with Chalmers Johnson and his ilk by the application of the โpreferential methodโ of research, which is his modus operandi across the board. That is, he never mentions Johnson and never addresses his facts and arguments. He also never cites Andrew Bacevich, another outstanding and experienced analyst who gives a lot of weight to the power of the military-industrial complex (MIC), its costliness, blowback consequences, and its threat to a democratic order.
Tip of the Hat to Berto Jongman.
Phi Beta Iota:ย The intellectual impoverishment of both the media world and the academic world is illuminated here.ย This book defines the intellectual impotence of the day.ย Failed states have gone from 25 to 175 in the last three US Administrations; the violence of poverty, disease, unilateral militarism, predatory capitalism, and virtual colonialism are dismissed by this book and this author.ย We have moved all too far from the Founding Fathers’ vision of educated citizenry as a Nation’s best defense.ย We have met the enemy and he is us.