In the past I might have given this book 4 stars despite its flaws, but my standards have gone up (I demand holistic analytics and true cost economics now for 5 stars) and the author makes too many mistakes in areas where I have superior knowledge.
Also new is the disgrace of the New York Times as a fake news Deep State media outlet, and the fact that the Pulitzer Prize is not worth anything, it is a controlled prize like the Nobel Peace Prize, and is named after one of the pioneers of yellow journalism, manufacturing wars for profit with lies.
There was a time when Michael Porter was moderately innovative and interesting. No more. This is a crap book that totally mis-represents reality. Just as Robert Reich’s crap book blames the bankers without reference to the Deep State and the Red Mafiya/Zionist traitors, this book blames the two-party tyranny as if they were the masters rather than the servants of the Deep State and the Red Mafiya/Zionist traitors.
The authors provide exactly one serious thought in this book:
QUOTE (3-4): Washington is working exactly as it is designed to work, and delivering exactly the results it is designed to deliver.
CORRECT. $16 billion a year to cover up the theft of $20 trillion a year, more of less. Unfortunately, they get the first number and don’t see the real puppet masters connected to the second number — George Soros, for example.
This is a very corrupt and deceptive book, a mediocre book, that suggests that greedy Wall Street bankers are to blame for everything including the corruption (no mention of blackmail) of politicians who serve the 1% and screw the 99% with impunity.
The author will make quite a bit of money with this shit book. It is 30 years late, superficial, has no index, and totally avoids discussing the real threat.
3 Stars for Deep Whining, Makes 1 Point Over and Over and Over Again
I finished the book and wrote the following:
30% shortfalls generally citing others
30% over-the-top misrepresentation
10% outright whining
The further I got into this book the more annoying I found the author, to the point that I would fire him rather than let him poison more young officers with his combination of grievances and ignorance.
3 Stars — Company Grade Officer Dabbles as Mercenary, Earns PhD, Pens a Sophmoric Best Seller Catering to Deep State Interests
Reviewed by Robert David Steele
This book is at best a ten page article with ten cute “rules” half of which are wrong. There are some useful observations in the book but it loses a second star and drops to three because it is completely lacking on multiple fronts. There are two kinds of “strategic” authors: opportunists, and visionaries. The author falls into the first category. He has no interest in — and no idea about — making things better (nor does he have a holistic analytic model), he is simply seeking to profit from “durable disorder” and advance his career within the Deep State / Shadow Government system that promotes people like him instead of people like Col Dr. Doug Macgregor.
3 Stars — Annoying Puff Piece that Glorifies Jared & Ivanka Kushner, Lacks Substance
I thought this book was going to be important so I looked at the index first (extremely good) and then the end notes (unprofessional and mediocre — URLs instead of full citations of author, title, publication, date). Then on page 7 the author calls Jared Kushner “brilliant” – this is the same Jared Kushner that was in the third out of five ranks in school, bought his way into Harvard, and took a $1B bribe from Qatar to save his failed business.