Winslow Wheelers: Morally Bankrupt Flag Officers Need to Go + Pentagon Corruption RECAP

Corruption, Idiocy, Ineptitude, Military
Winslow Wheeler
Winslow Wheeler

The Joint Chiefs of Staff testified to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees this week arguing that unless their budgets are augmented with still more money they will hollow out the armed forces. Most in the press and Congress didn't read their assertions that way, but two near simultaneous reports that provide some meaningful context for the Chiefs' demands recently became public. They put the Chiefs' behavior in a very different light.

THE SPENDAGON: A Stampede of Hysterics

America's generals are just as morally bankrupt as Congress.


Foreign Policy | FEBRUARY 14, 2013

I read two critically important reports this week on the impact that sequestration would have on national defense. That possible reduction in military spending — $48 billion, or 7.4 percent of the $645 billion currently appropriated for fiscal year 2013 — is being characterized by the stampede of hysterics who run the Pentagon as the virtual end of national security as we know it. What these two reports show is that we should now consider the Pentagon as morally and mentally broken as Congress.
The first report, by Chuck Spinney, who spent a few decades inside the Department of Defense evaluating budgets, weapons, and bureaucratic behavior, was published at Counterpunch and Time's Battleland blog. The second was a Congressional Research Service report by Amy Belasco, who has spent the last few decades at CRS and the Congressional Budget Office parsing defense budgets and their implications.

Both authors indirectly address the testimony this week of the deputy secretary of defense and the entire Joint Chiefs of Staff at the House and Senate Armed Services Committees. To a man, they lent all the rhetorical and substantive support they could muster to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta's depiction of sequestration as “doomsday” and to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey's description of it as an “unprecedented crisis” — a characterization he augmented by adding that he was “jumping up and down.” He truly was.

Put simply, the chiefs and their ostensible civilian masters plan to implement the cuts mandated by law in the most destructive, negative way possible, which has the convenient effect — for them — of pushing Congress and the White House to cough up more money. According to their testimony, the Army will reduce training levels to such a low point that units cannot be sent to Afghanistan. The Navy plans to postpone, if not cancel, maintenance for ships in a fleet already at historic lows for upkeep and repair, and deployments to the Persian Gulf have already been postponed. The Air Force is going to further reduce its historically low training of pilots, and maintenance will also hit new lows. Throughout the services, civilian maintainers, auditors, and program overseers will be furloughed, aircraft will be grounded, and ships held in port.

However, there is no reason for this to be so. Had Spinney and Belasco also been testifying at these hearings — had anyone in the committees been even slightly interested in a little balance or a few budget facts with cogent historic and objective perspective — the chiefs would probably have experienced a bureaucratic form of post-traumatic stress disorder.

What Spinney might have told the committees can best be summarized by this graph from his article:

Click on Image to Enlarge
Click on Image to Enlarge

The essential point is that even under the dreaded sequester, President Obama will spend more on defense than most other postwar presidents (and without the sequester he will outspend all of them, including Reagan). Moreover, it's all in dollars adjusted for inflation.

That's quite some “doomsday.” Surely, you will agree it's an “unprecedented crisis,” no?

For its part, Belasco's CRS report looks into the weeds of sequestration and finds that the chiefs are proposing to cut about twice as much as they need to from the central military readiness account in the operations and maintenance part of the Pentagon budget. They plan to lop off 20 percent, instead of the 10 to 12 percent that they could limit themselves to. They could be obviating many of those horrendous readiness cuts by hitting up less readiness-critical operations and maintenance accounts. But, of course, they chose not to.

And — not coincidentally I suspect — after all the cutting is done as planned, the chiefs will find themselves with even more money than they requested for some of their favorite hardware items. After the sequester has taken a cut out of the Pentagon's (separate and legally distinct) procurement account, the Air Force funding for aircraft will increase by $829 million; Navy shipbuilding will have $155 million more than requested for 2013 waiting to be spent, and the weapons and tracked combat vehicles account in the Army budget will have $404 million too much. Only in the collective of mindlessly selfish and careerist politicos in today's Congress and Pentagon “leadership” can a budget doomsday result in more than was asked for in certain — apparently covertly preferred — categories. It's quite staggering, but it's laid out explicitly in Belasco's report.

Deputy Secretary of Defense Ashton Cater put the cherry on top of this pile of absurdity when he testified that, when he was offered the flexibility to cut where he deemed appropriate (rather than the across-the-board cuts mandated by Congress), he actually declined.

What we have here is the mother of all Washington Monument budget drills: A classic Beltway gambit where agencies warn that any budget cuts whatsoever will force them to end their core mission, rather than cut out the fat. (The head of the National Park Service was fabled to testify that any cuts in his agency budget would force him to close the highly popular Washington Monument to the public.)

Today, Congress professes itself all too eager to fall for the ruse. At the hearings this week, members railed on about the stupidity of the laws the vast majority of them voted to enact; several of them even purported that it was all the Pentagon's fault, which didn't exactly go over well with the money-grubbing Joint Chiefs.

The irony, however, is that the rancor, self-aggrandizement, and cowardice that dominates so thoroughly in Congress means that the dreaded sequester is almost sure to take place on March 1. While both parties in both the House and the Senate have prepared bills to divert it, each side has — very consciously — written legislation that they know the other side will enthusiastically reject: The Democrats want tax increases to pay off the sequester; the Republicans want to decimate the federal work force. More intended for fund-raising and election-maneuvering, the bills were not just dead on arrival; they were dead in procreation.

Thus, we have a freakishly large budget being characterized by the Pentagon's military and civilian leadership as so small that they must literally destroy the armed forces' ability to fight. We have a Congress of Republicans and Democrats who declare themselves near universally dedicated to fixing the problem — with more money — while at the same time they work feverishly to make sure nothing happens. And just to reinforce just how serious they are, their action in the immediate aftermath of the hearings is to go on vacation for a week.

The biggest loser — and fall guy — in all of this is Chuck Hagel, who is anxiously trying to squeak by in his effort to replace Leon Panetta as secretary of defense. It comes after a profoundly depressing performance in his confirmation hearing, at which he inarticulately but effectively ate his own words on issue after issue in order to curry favor with even the most junior member of the Armed Services Committee. Eschewing also the opportunity to inject badly needed insight, information, and spine into the budget situation, Hagel also pandered eagerly to conventional wisdom, calling the sequester a “straightjacket” that would “devastate” the military and require DOD to “significantly revise the defense strategy.”

In the final analysis, Congress will do something to accommodate the budget protection gambit being performed by the real masters of the Pentagon, the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Meanwhile, the new secretary of defense, who has pre-emptively capitulated to the chiefs' budget fancies, as he has to everyone else, has made it abundantly clear that he will sit on his hands as the Pentagon decimates military readiness.

Chuck Spinney has tracked for decades our military forces as they have shriveled — counter-intuitively — at ever-increasing cost, and Amy Belasco has reported to Congress time and time again opportunities for doing things smart, not ugly. Both will be foregone for the easier and politically remunerative way the current system prefers to do things: stupid, crooked, and ever-so expensive.

Winslow T. Wheeler is director of the Straus Military Reform Project of the Center for Defense Information, which recently moved to the Project on Government Oversight. For 31 years he worked on national security issues for U.S. senators from both political parties and for the Government Accountability Office.

Phi Beta Iota:  If we had a Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) capable of published unclassified strategic, policy, acquisition, and operations intelligence (decision-support), the lies and misdirection of those testifying would not be possible.  Brother Winslow is absolutely right — the senior ranks of all of the services are corrupt to the bone — both uniformed and civilians.  There is no lie they will avoid if it does what they — being morally and intellectually challenged — want: as much budget share as possible, without regard to what it actually buys.  This is treason — high crimes and misdemeanors and a betrayal of the public trust.  We may actually have to hang a few people [whether we hang them or not, they need to be exposed to the public as worthy of hanging] and fire the whole lot of them, starting over with the best of the Colonels.  The next Secretary of Defense needs to do three things: 1) Eradicate the 30-40% waste that does not good for anyone but criminals committing corporate treason; 2) Create a 450-ship Navy, a long-haul Air Force, and an air-liftable Army that allow s the closure of most bases (targets) oversease, thus allowing both huge savings and the return of our troops (and their purchasing power) home to the USA; and 3) Craft defense intelligence so as to do all this, quickly, while also creating a national capability that can support Whole of Government planning, programming, budgeting, and execution.

See Also:

Afghanistan War Wealth + Corruption Cycle (Opium, Hashish, Minerals, Past Pipeline Attempts)

DefDog: The Pentagon’s new China war plan

Graphic: Integrity versus Corruption in Feedback Loops Over Three Eras

Journal: Government Corruption and Inattention; Foreign Influence and Access: Religious Counterintelligence

Journal: Pentagon Intellectual Spaghetti…

Journal: Pentagon’s Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) as a Metaphor for a Predictable Defense Meltdown

Marcus Aurelius: Army of None — Pentagon Loses Best & Brightest

Marcus Aurelius: Pentagon Plays the 800,000 Cuts Card, Dishonest to the Bone

Mario Profaca: Pentagon Insanity, DARPA Corruption

Mini-Me: Afghan & US Flag Corruption on “‘Auschwitz-like’ Conditions at Hospital + Meta-RECAP

Reference: The Pentagon Labyrinth

Review: Grand Theft Pentagon–Tales of Corruption and Profiteering in the War on Terror

Review: The Military Industrial Compex at 50

Winslow Wheeler: “Defense” Budget – the Full Enchilada

Winslow Wheeler: Elitist Corruption on the Defense Budget

Winston Wheeler: Lies, Damn Lies, & Panetta-Pentagon Criminal Insanity

Winslow Wheeler’s Officers Briefing (Successful and Unsuccessful Armies)

Winslow Wheeler: US Generals/Admirals Corrupt & Bloated — Panetta Reverses the Token Cuts by Gates

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Corruption

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Dereliction of Duty (Defense)

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Disinformation, Other Information Pathologies, & Repression

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Empire as Cancer Including Betrayal & Deceit

Worth a Look: Impeachable Offenses, Modern & Historic

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Institutionalized Ineptitude

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Intelligence (Lack Of)

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on War Complex—War as a Racket

Financial Liberty at Risk-728x90