Taming Big Tech: The Case for Monitoring
How, working in the shadows of the internet, researchers developed a passive monitoring system that might soon make Big Tech companies accountable to the publicโโโand even save democracy.
Here is what we found:
Here is what we found:
1) Bias. Overall, search rankings favored Mrs. Clinton over most of the 6-month period we had monitoredโโโenough, perhaps, to have shifted more than two million votes to her without people knowing how this had occurred. The pro-Clinton tilt appeared even though the search terms our field agents chose to use were, on average, slightly biased toward Mr. Trump.
2) Lots of bias. Between October 15th and Election Dayโโโthe period when we received the largest volume of dataโโโon all 22 of the days we received data, search rankings favored Mrs. Clinton in all 10 of the search positions on the first page of search results.
3) Google. The pro-Clinton favoritism was more than twice as large on Google than on Yahooโs search engine, which is, in any case, little more than an offshoot of Googleโs search engine these days. We had to discard our Bing data because all of it came from gmail users (more about this issue in a moment).
4) Demographic differences. Pro-Clinton search results were especially prevalent among decided voters, males, the young, and voters in Democratic states. But voters in Republican and swing states saw pro-Clinton search results too.
5) Tapering off. Over the course of the 10 days following the election, the pro-Clinton tilt gradually disappeared. All of these findings were highly statistically significant.
See Especially:
Dr. Robert Epstein Testimony on Google Censorship โ #GoogleGestapo
Zero Hedge: Google Biased at Every Level โ #GoogleGestapo Goes for 2020
See Also: