Stephen E. Arnold: Journal Subscription Doomsday

Collective Intelligence, Commerce, Corruption, Ineptitude, IO Impotency
2Shares
Stephen E. Arnold

Journal Subscription Doomsday Is Upon Us

China might have the great firewall when it comes to blocking access, but another infamous digital wall is the great academic paywall a.k.a. subscription paywalls that block access to scientific and academic journals. That could all be changing. Researchers everywhere are shocking and gasping at the thought of have free access to expensive research materials. Could this be the sound of celebration? Nature fills us in on the details in the story, “Radical Open-Access Plan Could Spell End To Journal Subscriptions.”

The celebrating would only take place in Europe, however, as European research funders have banded together for a radical open access initiative that could revolutionize science publishing. The publishers are already angry over this. The European funders are eleven agencies that spend over $8.8 billion annually in research grants. From 2020 and onward, they want all research papers resulting from their grants to be available under a liberal publishing license. The idea is that science should not be kept behind paywalls. The endeavor is called Plan S.

Read full post.

Phi Beta Iota: The “management” of knowledge is criminally, pathologically, deficient. We publish 1% of what is written and what is written is roughly 1% of what is know.  We have an economy — and a knowledge management system — that is 90% profit and obstacles to peace and prosperity — bankers and lawyers and toll takers.

See Especially:

Robert Steele: Can Thomson Reuters [or Bloomberg] Be a $20B+ per Year World Brain?

Robert Steele: Plans Advance for Displacement of #GoogleGestapo

Yoda: 1% Win in Court, Lose in Life — Sci-Hub Marches On…. #GoogleGestapo Expands to Blocking Scientific Information

See Also:

Elsevier @ Phi Bet Iota

Thomson Reuters @ Phi Beta Iota

Financial Liberty at Risk-728x90




liberty-risk-dark