This is the highest level depiction of the Expeditionary Environment analytic model created by the Marine Corps Intelligence Center (MCIC) on the basis of Robert Steele's first graduate thesis on the remediation of revolution across multiple dimensions. With deep help from the Warfighting Center, this model ultimately defined 144 mission area factors, and in warfighter terms, three to five degrees of difficulty for each of those factors. To the best of our knowledge, no such model exists within the U.S. Intelligence Community, nor is this model still in use at MCIA.
Graphic: Linear versus Diamond Paradigm
Advanced Cyber/IO, Analysis, Balance, Collection, Innovation, Leadership-Integrity, Multinational PlusFirst presented in Canada in 1994, this was the first depiction of how out-of-date the existing government intelligence communities are. They are hierarchical Weberian stove-pipes out of touch with reality and anyone who is actually steeped in reality.
The old intelligence paradigm is on the left–a very controlled hierarchical stovepipe process that is best characterized as twelve-month planning cycles followed by three-month writing cycles and eighteen-month editing cycles. Most of what we produce is too late, not right, and not useful.
The new intelligence paradigm makes the acme of skill “knowing who knows” (with a tip of the hat to Stevan Dedijer) and the ability to put a consumer with a question in touch with a source (or multiple sources) who can create new tailored knowledge in the instant.
Graphic: Threat Level Changes Depending on the Level of Analysis
Advanced Cyber/IO, Analysis, Strategy-Holistic Coherence, ThreatsHard to believe, but we are not making this up. The U.S. Intelligence Community still does not routinely depict threats in relation to the level of analysis, only in absolute terms and generally in worst-case technical threat terms assuming idealized scenarios favoring the enemy. And when that is not good enough, field grade officers are assigned to manipulate the data bases and fabricate threat capabilities.
Graphic: Global Intelligence Processing Failure
Advanced Cyber/IO, Analysis, Balance, Capabilities-Force Structure, Processing, Strategy-Holistic CoherenceThis slide, less the bulls-eye that still does not exist, was created by the Collection Requirements & Evaluation Staff (CRES) of the Directorate of Intelligence (DI) at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), in the mid to late 1990's. It is still more or less on target, which should give the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) something to think about–MASINT is a bust, HUMINT is inept, and OSINT is underfunded. Time for leadership.
Graphic: Global Intelligence Collection Failure
Advanced Cyber/IO, Balance, Collection, Languages-Translation, Leadership-Integrity, Strategy-Holistic CoherenceGraphic: Four National Reforms
Advanced Cyber/IO, Balance, Capabilities-Force Structure, Leadership-Integrity, Reform, Strategy-Holistic CoherenceSee Also:
2008 Election 2008 Chapter: The Substance of Governance
2002 Robert Steele: Citizen in Search of Integrity (Full Text Online for Google Translate)
1995 GIQ 13/2 Creating a Smart Nation: Strategy, Policy, Intelligence, and Information
1992 E3i: Ethics, Ecology, Evolution, & intelligence (An Alternative Paradigm)