Reference: Data Is the New Dirt–Visualization

Analysis, Augmented Reality, Blog Wisdom, Briefings (Core), Collective Intelligence, info-graphics/data-visualization, InfoOps (IO), IO Sense-Making, Methods & Process, Peace Intelligence
Full Short Video Brief Online

About this talk

David McCandless turns complex data sets (like worldwide military spending, media buzz, Facebook status updates) into beautiful, simple diagrams that tease out unseen patterns and connections. Good design, he suggests, is the best way to navigate information glut — and it may just change the way we see the world.

About David McCandless

David McCandless draws beautiful conclusions from complex datasets — thus revealing unexpected insights into our world. Full bio and more links

Phi Beta Iota: “Mining” the soil does not go far.  Actually planting, tilling, watering, and growing is much more powerful.  This is one of the most compelling TED briefs we have seen.  “Language of the eye” combined with “language of the mind.”  All about “relative” numbers and relationships.  “Let the data set change your mindset.”  Art of knowledge compression.  Living data in a Google document.  If you visit his books at Amazon, take the time to check out the related books on data visualization that Amazon clusters for around these.

Tip of the Hat to Magnus Hultberg at LinkedIn.  Also see these resources.

David McCandless' two books:

Amazon Page
Amazon Page

Reference: Sustainable World by 2050

About the Idea, Briefings (Core)
Full Briefing Online

Phi Beta Iota: Professor Robert Horn of Stanford is one of the co-founders and continuing intellects unified by Earth Intelligence Network, and a true genius at sustainability design and visualization.  His original term of continuing value is  “information mapping.”  This, his latest briefing, is a most helpful offering in relation to creating global strategies for education, intelligence, and research.  Visit Professor Horn at his HOME PAGE.

See Also:

Bite-Size View of Full Wall Mural (Fast but Still 17MB)

Full Size Wall Mural is offered for sale, laminated, C$945.  Order from RubenNelson at shaw.ca

Book on Mapping Hypertext (1989)

Reference: American Health Care Compared

07 Health, Briefings (Core)
Chuck Spinney
Chuck Spinney

Phi Beta Iota: The briefing below, flagged by Chuck Spinney from the New America Foundation, fails to make the one really big point: that PriceWaterHouseCoopers has found that 50% of all health care spending in the USA is WASTE.  However, given the profit motive, that waste generates overhead, and so there is no incentive for our greedy irresponsible health care corporations, who have fulfilled all Congressional demands for bribes, to actually try to deliver the best care at the lowest price.  In that light, our health care is actually better than everyone elses, we just charge twice as much as we should.  The other point that the Obama Administration is assiduously avoiding is the cost of Medicare drugs–the so-called “reform,” which is not a reform at all, just the health equivalent of the Wall Street bail-out, finally seeks to acquire drugs at Canadian price levels, or 10% of what we pay now, but avoids completely the disclosure of the fact that other countries such as  Thailand and South Africa pay 1% of what we pay, not 10%.  There is so much dishonesty across every aspect of the health care “dialog” (more like theater of the macabre) that we don't find it at all surprising to see Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) right in the middle of BOTH the Wall Street bailout with unlimited bonuses, AND the health care debacle.

Briefing Online (No Notes)
Briefing Online (No Notes)
New America Web Site
New America Web Site

Reference: Creating a global knowledge network

Briefings (Core)
Creating a Global Knowledge Network
Creating a Global Knowledge Network

Abstract: If we were to start from scratch today to design a quality-controlled archive and distribution system for research findings, would it be realized as a set of “electronic clones” of print journals? Could we imagine instead some form of incipient knowledge network for our research communications infrastructure? What differences should be expected in its realization for different scientific research fields? Is there an obvious alternative to the false dichotomy of “classical peer review” vs. no quality control at all? What is the proper role of governments and their funding agencies in this enterprise, and what might be the role of suitably configured professional societies? These are some of the key questions raised by the past decade of initial experience with new forms of electronic research infrastructure. In the below, I will suggest only some partial answers to the above, with more complete answers expected on the 5-10 year timescale.

Continue reading “Reference: Creating a global knowledge network”