Patrick Meier: Map or Be Mapped — Psycho-Social Political-Economic Power in a Map

Geospatial
Patrick Meier
Patrick Meier

Map or Be Mapped: Otherwise You Don’t Exist

“There are hardly any street signs here. There are no official zip codes. No addresses. Just word of mouth” (1). Such is the fate of Brazil’s Mare shanty-town and that of most shantytowns around the world where the spoken word is king (and not necessarily benevolent). “The sprawling complex of slums, along with the rest of Rio de Janerio’s favelas, has hung in a sort of ‘legal invisibility’ since 1937, when a city ordinance ruled that however unsightly, favelas should be kept off maps because they were merely ‘temporary’” (2).

shantytown

The socio-economic consequences were far-reaching. For decades, this infor-mality meant that “entire neighborhoods did not receive mail. It had also blocked people from giving required information on job applications, getting a bank account or telling the police or fire department where to go in an emergency call. Favela residents had to pick up their mail from their neighborhood associations, and entire slums housing a small town’s worth of residents had to use the zip code of the closest officially recognized street” (3).

All this is starting to change thanks to a grassroots initiative that is surveying Mare’s 16 favelas, home to some 130,000 people. This community-driven project has appropriated the same survey methodology used by the Brazilian government’s Institute of Geography and Statistics. The collected data includes “not only street names but the history of the original smaller favelas that make up the community” (4). This data is then “formatted into pocket guides and distributed gratis to residents. These guides also offer background on certain streets’ namesakes, but leave some blank so that residents can fill them in as Mare […] continues shifting out from the shadows of liminal space to a city with distinct identities” (5). And so, “residents of Rio’s famed favelas are undergoing their first real and ‘fundamental step toward citizenship’” (6).

These bottom-up, counter-mapping efforts are inherently political—call it guerrilla mapping. Traditionally, maps have represented “not just the per-spective of the cartographer herself, but of much larger institutions—of corporations, organizations, and governments” (7). The scale was fixed at one and only one scale, that of the State. Today, informal communities can take matters into their own hands and put themselves on the map; at the scale of their choosing. But companies like Google still have the power to make these communities vanish. In Brazil, Google said it “would tweak the site’s [Google Maps'] design, namely its text size and district labeling to show favela names only after users zoomed in on those areas.”

Continue reading “Patrick Meier: Map or Be Mapped — Psycho-Social Political-Economic Power in a Map”

Michel Bauwens: DIY Currencies for DIY Communities

Money, P2P / Panarchy
Michel Bauwens
Michel Bauwens

Trend 7: DIY Currencies For DIY Communities”>DIY Currencies For DIY Communities

The economic downturn of recent years has led to a decline in confidence in the financial markets. The renewed focus on local communities, ‘DIY’ and alternative ways of city-making go hand-in-hand with the rise of the peer-to-peer economy. Increasing numbers of people start to take matters into their own hands. If money fails, why not introduce your own currency?

In one of our trend reports of last year we mentioned the peer-to-peer economy. The global economic situation stimulates us to rethink what we already have and how we can use it in a more profitable way. Thanks to the Web, marketplaces for peer-to-peer services have grown immensely — think of initiatives such as AirBnB, Deskwanted and Zipcar. Peer-to-peer culture has become one of the assets of community regeneration as the majority of offline peer-to-peer activity takes place in local, mostly urban settings. Over the last years, more and more communities have realized that also money can be organized peer-to-peer, which has resulted in the increase of so-called Complementary Currencies, currencies that lie outside the realm of legal tender and are issued into circulation by groups or organizations other than governments or banks.

Read illustrated article.

See Also:

  1. Trend 1: Spotify The City
  2. Trend 2: Secret Urbanism And New Exclusivity
  3. Trend 3: The Reinvention Of The Post Box
  4. Trend 4: The Factory Moves Back Into Our Houses
  5. Trend 5: Local Urban Culture Goes Global
  6. Trend 6: Online Stores Revitalize Shopping Streets
  7. Trend 7: DIY Currencies For DIY Communities
  8. Trend 8: Urban Farming Becomes Serious Business
  9. Trend 9: Want To Claim Your City? There’s An App For That
  10. Trend 10: The Rise Of Indie Architecture

Bojan Radej: German Government Screws Up Open Data

Data
Bojan Radej
Bojan Radej

German government screws up open data

OpenGov Germany, 4 February 2013

Last year, the German government commissioned a fairly extensive study (Link) on open data, and started preparations for an open government data portal. The open data community felt somewhat relieved. After all, lobbying for more open government in Germany, the cradle of prussian bureaucracy, is not exactly an easy task. This is a state apparatus dominated by information silos, dusty hierarchies, pen and paper workflows and an attitude towards citizens that often borders on arrogant. Bravo to the few change agents within the Federal Ministry on the Interior, who over the last months and years have closely collaboratored with a multitude of actors, including app contests and bar camps.

Here is what happened. Actors like the Open Knowledge Foundation (German chapter) had long ago built an open data visualization website (link), and had offered both the Interior as well as the Ministry of Finance, to actually provide that platform to them, basically developing infrastructure for the government. How nice. Community-public-partnership, real open government. What a pipe dream. Last fall, the Ministry of Finance unveiled its own data visualization website, for who knows how many thousand euros in fees paid to web agencies (Update: it cost 40.000 EUR, the original budget was 200.000 EUR ). It looks alright but isn’t as open as experts had hoped, and the amount of data is lackluster – tools for comparison and other accountability-encouraging functionality is missing.

Read full article.

SmartPlanet: Is a free nationwide WiFi network coming to the U.S.?

Autonomous Internet

smartplanet logoIs a free nationwide WiFi network coming to the U.S.?

Tyler Falk, 4 February 2013

The United States government wants to make access to fast and free WiFi as easy as accessing public roads.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission has proposed to free up digital infrastructure to allow free public access to WiFi — more powerful than what most people have in their homes — in most metropolitan areas and many rural areas, The Washington Post reports:

If approved by the FCC, the free networks would still take several years to set up. And, with no one actively managing them, con­nections could easily become jammed in major cities. But public WiFi could allow many consumers to make free calls from their mobile phones via the Internet. The frugal-minded could even use the service in their homes, allowing them to cut off expensive Internet bills.

To achieve this, the government would have to repurpose how airwaves are used. As the Post points out, that means local television stations and other broadcasters would have to sell some of their airwaves to the government. Whether companies are willing to make the sale is yet to be seen.

As you can imagine, support of the proposal is split between two major industries. On the one hand, the telecomm industry is lobbying the government to keep those airwaves in the hands of businesses.

Tech giants like Google and Microsoft, however, see a nationwide public WiFi network as a catalyst for innovation (and increased sales of their products). Though Google, at least, isn’t waiting for the government to act to offer free public WiFi. In New York City, the company recently launched free public WiFi in the Chelsea neighborhood.

But a free-for-all WiFi network? Politics will decide its fate.

Tech, telecom giants take sides as FCC proposes large public WiFi networks [Washington Post]

SmartPlanet: Goodbye ‘information economy’; hello ‘hacker economy’

SmartPlanet

smartplanet logoGoodbye ‘information economy’; hello ‘hacker economy’

By Joe McKendrick | February 3, 2013, 9:09 AM PST

By now, the term “information economy” has been beaten to death. Now, we may be moving into a new realm one observer calls the “hacker economy.”

That’s the word from Greg Satell, who suggests that we’re evolving beyond the information economy, into something more participative, driven by individuals from the ground up.  One of the most often-stated paradigm shifts associated with the information economy was that data is what holds value, and that society’s wealth — and everyone’s work — would be created by moving, storing and trading in this abstract commodity. Manufacturing was someone else’s problem.  Perhaps people are rethinking the importance of physical goods production as an integrated part of the economic equation. Satell calls this the “hacker economy.” Maybe not the best term, but here’s how he describes it:

In the hacker economy, “brands become platforms rather than products.  An iPhone is valuable not so much for the hardware, but for the apps created by third parties and, increasingly, those third parties are small entities or individuals. The irony here is that the hacker economy is, in a very real sense, fostering a return to the craft economy. … there is a large movement of people using open source technology to create their own products, although many are doing it for fun and enrichment rather than necessity.”

New York Times columnist Tom Friedman coined the term “DIY economy” a couple years back, suggesting that its participants (us) create value by assembling and delivering products and services via online services and networks. Satell adds an additional wrinkle with the emerging maker trend, made possible by 3D printing.

In the process, he suggests, the creation of physical goods — taken out of the equation in the information economy — is back in play. “It is mass production, combined with knowledge and information, which has created such enormous wealth that we can choose our own possibilities.”  “DIY” or “hacker” economy” may not be the best terms to describe what is coming: the tantalizing possibility that individuals may have greater and more rewarding roles to play than in past economic shifts — without writing off an entire sector of the workforce.

Continue reading “SmartPlanet: Goodbye ‘information economy’; hello ‘hacker economy’”

Event 14 Feb 1000-1200 GWU Getting Complex Projects to Work — Transaction Cost Economics

Economics/True Cost

Getting Complex Projects to Work: Short, Medium and Long-Term

By Neil E. Boyle

The George Washington University
University Seminar on Reflexive Systems
Thursday, February 14, 2013 from 10am – 12pm
Funger Hall, Room 620
2201 G Street NW

Abstract

Continue reading “Event 14 Feb 1000-1200 GWU Getting Complex Projects to Work — Transaction Cost Economics”

Yoda: US Diplomatic-Commercial Internet Initiative — Affordable Good, Proprietary Bad

#OSE Open Source Everything, IO Impotency
Got Crowd? BE the Force!
Got Crowd? BE the Force!

Half-full, glass is.

Hillary Clinton Helps Silicon Valley on Her Way Out the Door

Elizabeth Dwoskin

BloombergBusinessWeek, 4 February 2013

Taking the podium in the State Department’s Ben Franklin Room one last time on Thursday before stepping down, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton thanked lots of people, offered reminiscences, and announced a flurry of last-minute initiatives. “We’re all like one millisecond away from just collapsing here, because of the emotion and the feelings that are coursing through all of us,” Clinton said.

One of those new initiatives, the Alliance for an Affordable Internet, barely got a mention in Clinton’s speech. But it merits attention. If successful, the project—a public-private partnership among the State Department, the World Wide Web Foundation, and tech companies such as Cisco Systems (CSCO), Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo (YHOO) and Intel (INTC)—could end up helping many people in poor countries get onto the Web. It could also cement long-term ties between the State Department and the companies—while opening new markets and reaching new customers for Silicon Valley. “We’re going to help the next billion people come online,” said Clinton, quickly announcing the project before going on to talk about clean cook stoves for women in the developing world.

Read rest of article.

Continue reading “Yoda: US Diplomatic-Commercial Internet Initiative — Affordable Good, Proprietary Bad”