Patrick Meier: What is Big (Crisis) Data? How Do You Reduce Relevant Mass? Human Solutions to Machine Filter Failure

Crowd-Sourcing, Design, Geospatial
Patrick Meier
Patrick Meier

What is Big (Crisis) Data?

What does Big Data mean in the context of disaster response? Big (Crisis) Data refers to the relatively large volumevelocity and variety of digital information that may improve sense making and situational awareness during disasters. This is often referred to the 3 V’s of Big Data.

Volume refers to the amount of data (20 million tweets were posted during Hurricane Sandy) while Velocity refers to the speed at which that data is generated (over 2,000 tweets per second were generated following the Japan Earthquake & Tsunami). Variety refers to the variety of data generated, e.g., Numerical (GPS coordinates), Textual (SMS), Audio (phone calls), Photographic (satellite Imagery) and Video-graphic (YouTube). Sources of Big Crisis Data thus include both public and private sources such images posted as social media (Instagram) on the one hand, and emails or phone calls (Call Record Data) on the other. Big Crisis Data also relates to both raw data (the text of individual Facebook updates) as well as meta-data (the time and place those updates were posted, for example).

Ultimately, Big Data describe datasets that are too large to be effectively and quickly computed on your average desktop or laptop. In other words, Big Data is relative to the computing power—the filters—at your finger tips (along with the skills necessary to apply that computing power). Put differently, Big Data is “Big” because of filter failure. If we had more powerful filters, said “Big” Data would be easier to manage. As mentioned in previous blog posts, these filters can be created using Human Computing (crowdsourcing, microtasking) and/or Machine Computing (natural language processing, machine learning, etc.).

Click on Image to Enlarge
Click on Image to Enlarge

Take the [first] graph, for example. The horizontal axis represents time while the vertical one represents volume of information. On a good day, i.e., when there are no major disasters, the Digital Operations Center of the American Red Cross monitors and manually reads about 5,000 tweets. This “steady state” volume and velocity of data is represented by the green area. The dotted line just above denotes an organization’s (or individual’s) capacity to manage a given volume, velocity and variety of data. When disaster strikes, that capacity is stretched and often overwhelmed. More than 3 million tweets were posted during the first 48 hours after the Category 5 Tornado devastated Moore, Oklahoma, for example. What happens next is depicted in the [second] graph below.

Humanitarian and emergency management organizations often lack the internal surge capacity to manage the rapid increase in data generated during disasters. This Big Crisis Data is represented by the red area. But the dotted line can be raised. One way to do so is by building better filters (using Human and/or Machine Computing). Real world examples of Human and Machine Computing used for disaster response are highlighted here and here respectively.

A second way to shift the dotted line is with enlightened leadership [third graphic]. An example is the Filipino Government’s actions during the recent Typhoon. More on policy here. Both strategies (advanced computing & strategic policies) are necessary to raise that dotted line in a consistent manner.

See also:

  • Big Data for Disaster Response: A List of Wrong Assumptions [Link]

Jean Lievens: SHARING Culture and Economy in the Internet Age

Design, Economics/True Cost, P2P / Panarchy
Jean Lievens
Jean Lievens

This site hosts the augmented edition of Sharing: Culture and the Economy in the Internet Age, a book by Philippe Aigrain, with the contribution of Suzanne Aigrain, published at Amsterdam University Press on February 1st, 2012 as a paper book and as an open access digital monograph. On this site, you can access the source code and datasets used in the book, comment on each of the book chapters, run our economic models for the financing of a sharing-compatible culture with your choice of parameters, and run our diversity of attention analysis software on your own datasets.

Publisher and US distributor presentations

Amazon Page
Amazon Page

In the past fifteen years, file sharing of digital cultural works between individuals has been at the center of a number of debates on the future of culture itself. To some, sharing constitutes piracy, to be fought against and eradicated. Others see it as unavoidable, and table proposals to compensate for its harmful effects. Meanwhile, little progress has been made towards addressing the real challenges facing culture in a digital world.

Sharing starts from a radically different viewpoint, namely that the non-market sharing of digital works is both legitimate and useful. It supports this premise with empirical research, demonstrating that non-market sharing leads to more diversity in the attention given to various works. Taking stock of what we have learnt about the cultural economy in recent years, Sharing sets out the conditions necessary for valuable cultural functions to remain sustainable in this context.

An in-depth exploration of digital culture and its dissemination, Sharing offers a counterpoint to the dominant view that file sharing is piracy. Instead, Philippe Aigrain looks at the benefits of file sharing, which allows unknown writers and artists to be appreciated more easily. Concentrating not only on the cultural enrichment caused by widely shared digital media, Sharing also discusses new financing models that would allow works to be shared freely by individuals without aim at profit. Aigrain carefully balances the needs to support and reward creative activity with a suitable respect for the cultural common good and proposes a new interpretation of the digital landscape.

About the authors

Philippe Aigrain is the CEO of Sopinspace – Society for Public Information Spaces and one of the founders of La Quadrature du Net. He previously authored Cause commune: l'information entre bien commun et propriété, Fayard, 2005.

Suzanne Aigrain is lecturer in astrophysics at Oxford University and a fellow of All Souls College.

Berto Jongman: Hans Rosling on Future Energy and Why Two Billion Poorest Matter

05 Energy, 06 Family, 07 Health, Design, Governance
Berto Jongman
Berto Jongman

Hans Rosling Illustrates Future Energy Consumption with Legos

by Big Think Editors

June 25, 2013, 3:01 PM

Here is the most low-tech explanation you will see on population growth, infant mortality and energy consumption, courtesy of the Swedish professor of global health, Hans Rosling. In the video below, Rosling makes strikingly clear through his lego demonstration that sustainable growth is only possible if we raise the living standards of the bottom two billion.

While the solution to this problem is elusive, there are few illustrations that you will find that present this global challenge in such clear terms as this video.

YouTube (3:18)

Jean Lievins: The Networked Society — DISRUPTIVE Technology Rules — and the Most Disruptive of All Technologies is C4ISR Technology that is Also Open Source

Architecture, Cloud, Culture, Design, Innovation, Knowledge, P2P / Panarchy, Resilience, Security
Jean Lievens
Jean Lievens

It’s about doing the impossible – faster

Technology is transforming how everybody builds solutions and faster access to the latest technology gives you an unfair advantage. I work in Silicon Valley and we benefit from that unfair advantage. This is because the technology being invented here is not incremental but disruptive.

EXTRACT:

You will notice the inclusion of Guardtime signatures. By signing all objects with Guardtime signatures it means we no longer have to trust the cloud provider – another game changer! A technology that scales so well it has been included in rysylog.

More background on the accelerating pace of change:
Changing the game
Winning the game

Continue reading “Jean Lievins: The Networked Society — DISRUPTIVE Technology Rules — and the Most Disruptive of All Technologies is C4ISR Technology that is Also Open Source”

Worth a Look: Nigerian 4 in 1 Farming Device — The Farmking

Design, Innovation
Click on Image to Enlarge
Click on Image to Enlarge

On one end you have 3 devices, for chipping, grating and milling. In the middle is the power plant, and in the rear is a large steel drum that can hold 50kgs of milled cassava, that uses a spin filter to process up to 2.5 tons of milled cassava into starch.

It’s used for processing of cassava, soya beans, maize, sweet potatoes, yam and many other roots and grains. One of the more interesting uses for it is the capture of starch.

Sulaiman went to the Pratt Institute in Brooklyn for his undergrad, then on to the Polytechnic Institute of NYU for his masters, finishing in 1976. The Farmking is a project of his that he built on his nights and weekends, claiming that he likes best to work by himself when no one else is around to bother him. It cost approximately 2.5m Naira ($16,000) to buy one, and the prototype (seen here) was built using his own money.

Source