Mini-Me: NATO Admiral Says the Future of Global Security is Strategic Communication — Robert Steele Corrects + META-RECAP

Cultural Intelligence, Economics/True Cost, Ethics, Military, Politics
Who? Mini-Me?

Huh?

NATO Admiral Says the Future of Global Security is Strategic Communication

Written by on · Leave a Comment

by Scott W. Ruston

The title of this post is my interpretation of what ADM James Stavridis, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) and Commander of United States European Command (USEUCOM), says in a new TED Talk. To be fair, what he actually says is that strategic communication should be the means by which the partnerships of an open source security strategy will be knitted together.

I’ve been admirer of ADM Stavridis for a long time, especially his embrace of social media and public diplomacy (In the interest of full disclosure: In addition to my role as a scholar of strategic communication, narrative and social media at the CSC, I am also US Navy Reserve officer assigned to NATO ACT; my remarks here reflect my own opinions and not those of the US Navy nor NATO).  The admiral’s TED talk unites his own personal advocacy for transparency and connectedness in his leadership roles with NATO and US DOD (he has a substantial presence on Facebook and Twitter) with a broader vision of sustainable security efforts globally.

Read rest of post.

Below the line: Related Article, 2 Comments by Steele, and See Also.

Continue reading “Mini-Me: NATO Admiral Says the Future of Global Security is Strategic Communication — Robert Steele Corrects + META-RECAP”

Marcus Aurelius: Understanding Amateurs at the White House with Comment by Robert Steele as Posted at Foreign Policy

Cultural Intelligence, Government, Idiocy, Knowledge, Politics
Marcus Aurelius

ForeignPolicy.com, August 2, 2012

Thought Cloud

The real problem with the civilian-military gap.

By Rosa Brooks

One of the biggest misunderstandings about the civilian-military gap is that it is cultural — the national security version of the red state-blue state divide.

But the distance between those in and out of uniform isn't fundamentally a matter of Texas vs. Massachusetts or NASCAR vs. Wimbledon. At the most basic level, it encompasses deeply different understandings of how we think — how we plan, how we evaluate risk, even how we define problems in the first place. Ironically, the one place where the gap should be the most avoidable is the place where its effects are the most pernicious: Washington.

Continue reading “Marcus Aurelius: Understanding Amateurs at the White House with Comment by Robert Steele as Posted at Foreign Policy”

Mini-Me: Assassination & Election Cancellation Rumors Again

Corruption, Government, Politics
Who? Mini-Me?

Huh?

Kelly Keisling, Tennessee Legislator, Mass Emailed Obama ‘Staged Assassination' Rumor

John Celock

Huffington Post, 31 July 2012

Rep. Kelly Keisling, a Republican member of the Tennessee state legislature is circulating a rumor in conservative circles that President Barack Obama is planning to stage a fake assassination attempt—-that he claims would lead to civil unrest in urban areas and martial law—-in an effort to stop the 2012 election from happening.

Read full article.

Phi Beta Iota:  Similar rumors circulated when Dick Cheny was making similar martial law moves, including Halliburton “resettlement” camps.  The two-party tyranny is much smarter than that–Romney is the stalking horse this time, playing the role that Sarah Palin played.  If he selects Condi Rice as his Vice President, this will be high theater indeed.

See Also:

Rep. Kelly Keisling emailed Obama false flag assassination rumor [full copy of email]

YouTube (7:18) The 2012 Elections Are Cancelled! YouTube

YouTube (14:10)  OBAMA might CANCEL 2012 Elections! Dr. Jerome Corsi, Alex Jones pt 1

2012 Testing the Two-Party Tyranny and Open Source Everything – The Battle for the Soul of the Republic

David Isenberg: 6 Books, State of the Union

Cultural Intelligence, Politics
David Isenberg

Obama and Terror: The Hovering Questions

David Cole, New York Review of Books, 12 July 2012

Reviewing:

Kill or Capture: The War on Terror and the Soul of the Obama Presidency
by Daniel Klaidman  Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 288 pp., $28.00

Power and Constraint: The Accountable Presidency after 9/11
by Jack Goldsmith  Norton, 311 pp., $26.95

The Weird Truth About Texas

Thomas Powers, New York Review of Books, 12 July 2012

Reviewing:

As Texas Goes…: How the Lone Star State Hijacked the American Agenda
by Gail Collins  Liveright, 267 pp., $25.95

 

Getting Away with It

Paul Krugman and Robin Wells, New York Review of Books, 12 July 2012

Reviewing:

The Escape Artists: How Obama’s Team Fumbled the Recovery
by Noam Scheiber
Simon and Schuster, 351 pp., $28.00

Pity the Billionaire: The Hard-Times Swindle and the Unlikely Comeback of the Right
by Thomas Frank
Metropolitan, 225 pp., $25.00

The Age of Austerity: How Scarcity Will Remake American Politics
by Thomas Byrne Edsall
Doubleday, 256 pp., $24.95

Mariusz Leś: Over-Lapping Loose Networks or Walled Cities?

P2P / Panarchy, Politics
Mariusz Les

The battle of freedom and control in a networked world

Networked individualism is reshaping social interaction as we renegotiate the balance between the one and the many

OUR social relationships are changing and technology is at the centre of this unfolding story.

Take stock of your own world. You probably have a few family members and friends who mean the world to you. Then there are the many acquaintances, contacts, “followers” and “consequential strangers” who you only interact with occasionally but who serve useful purposes when you have questions, need to make decisions or require a helping hand.

Your ties to all of them, especially those in the outer reaches of your network, are increasingly mediated through digital technology – from email to Facebook to Skype calls.

This new social operating system has been emerging for several generations but has accelerated in growth thanks to the recent triple revolution: the widespread adoption of broadband, ubiquitous mobile connectivity and the move from bounded groups – largely closed circles of interlinked contacts – to multiple social networks.

. . . . . . . . .

With such a fundamental social shift linked to still-developing technology, how it unfolds needs to be considered. We think there are two possible scenarios.

Read full article.

John Steiner: Bob Burnett on Renewing Democracy, Shifting Paradigm and Open Letter from Robert Steele

Politics
John Steiner

Renewing Democracy: Shifting the Paradigm

Bob Burnett

Huffington Post, 27 July 2012

Thomas Jefferson believed in renewing democracy by regularly shifting the dominant social paradigm.  Jefferson argued that constitutions should be rewritten every generation, declaring the ³dead should not govern the living.² That explains why contemporary Americans are so fractious: we¹re overdue for a new paradigm.

In computer technology the dominant paradigm has shifted approximately every twenty years.   In 1954 IBM introduced a mass-produced mainframe computer, the 704.  In 1977 the personal computer era began with the introduction of the Commodore PET.  In 1996 Nokia introduced the modern era by introducing the 9000 Communicator, a personal data assistant.

Not every company can adapt to change. In December of 2000, Microsoft stock shares were worth $119.94; it was the most valuable corporation in the world with a market capitalization of $510 billion. When the paradigm shifted to the personal data assistant, Microsoft didn¹t adapt but Apple did.  In October of 2001, Apple introduced the Ipod ­ a digital music player.  Apple followed with the 2007 release of the IPhone and the 2010 introduction of the IPad.  Today Microsoft¹s stock is worth $29.15 per share and its market capitalization is $244B.   In twelve years, Apple¹s stock increased in value from $8.19 to $574; its market cap rose from $4.8B to $538B and it became
the world¹s most valuable company.

In the last eighty years there have been two social paradigm shifts.  In the thirties, Franklin Delano Roosevelt ushered in ³the New Deal² in response to a catastrophic depression.  ³Throughout the nation men and women, forgotten in the political philosophy of the Government, look to us here for guidance and for more equitable opportunity to share in the distribution of national wealth… I pledge myself to a new deal for the American people.²  The New Deal featured “three R's”: relief, recovery, and reform; it provided a safety net for all Americans.

Continue reading “John Steiner: Bob Burnett on Renewing Democracy, Shifting Paradigm and Open Letter from Robert Steele”

David Isenberg: President Wants What IC Cannot Give – With Comment by Robert Steele

Corruption, Government, IO Impotency, Knowledge, Politics
David Isenberg

President Obama Wants Smartphones, Tablets To Improve Intel Monitoring: Sez Head of White House Communications Agency

WASHINGTON: When the Presidential Daily Briefing occurs, a top intelligence official traditionally hands the president a folder with a sheaf of paper inside. The president may read what's inside or have it presented by the intelligence official. Then comes question time, when the chief executive and commander in chief can ask how reliable a source is or question the assumptions of an analysis he's just read.

But that will change. The president and his top officials want and will get a single mobile device allowing them to access highly classified and unclassified data wherever they are. The early fruits of the intelligence community's early efforts to do that are visible in the photo above. It shows President Obama in the Oval Office on January 31 using a technically neutered tablet as part of the Presidential Daily Briefing.

. . . . . .

A single device is the Holy Grail for the intelligence community and senior government officials, but it will be some time before it happens, the colonel said. In the near term, the White House hopes to issue two devices: one for classified and another for unclassified communications. It is coordinating with the Defense Department and the National Security Agency to ensure access to secure defense communications networks intelligence grade cryptographic algorithms.

Read full article.

Continue reading “David Isenberg: President Wants What IC Cannot Give – With Comment by Robert Steele”