Supreme Court Says Warrants, States’ Rights Unnecessary

07 Other Atrocities, 09 Justice, Civil Society, Corruption, Cultural Intelligence, Law Enforcement

Supreme Court Says Warrants, States’ Rights Unnecessary

Thomas R. Eddlem, 18 May 2011


States cannot grant their citizens wider freedoms from search and seizure than federal courts do, and police may manipulate events that allow them to avoid getting Fourth Amendment search warrants from judges for home searches, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled May 13 in the case of Kentucky v. King. The 8-1 decision included a stinging dissent from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, one of the most liberal justices on the bench.

Ginsberg argued in her dissent: “The Court today arms the police with a way routinely to dishonor the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement in drug cases. In lieu of presenting their evidence to a neutral magistrate, police officers may now knock, listen, then break the door down, nevermind that they had ample time to obtain a warrant.”

Read rest of article….

Phi Beta Iota: We don’t make this stuff up.  The USA is down the toilet at multiple levels.

Opt in for free daily update from this free blog. Separately The Steele Report ($11/mo) offers weekly text report and live webinar exclusive to paid subscribers, who can also ask questions of Robert. Or donate to ask questions directly of Robert.