[5G] THE LARGEST UNETHICAL MEDICAL EXPERIMENT IN HUMAN HISTORY
Ronald N. Kostoff, Ph.D.
Research Affiliate, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology
KEYWORDS
Unethical Research; Electromagnetic Fields; Wireless Radiation; Radiofrequency Radiation; RF; Non-Ionizing Radiation; Mobile Networking Technology; 5G; Adverse Health Effects
SHORT URL THIS POST: https://tinyurl.com/5G-Coffin
ABSTRACT
This monograph describes the largest unethical medical experiment in human history: the implementation and operation of non-ionizing non-visible EMF radiation (hereafter called wireless radiation) infrastructure for communications, surveillance, weaponry, and other applications. It is unethical because it violates the key ethical medical experiment requirement for “informed consent” by the overwhelming majority of the participants.
The monograph provides background on unethical medical research/experimentation, and frames the implementation of wireless radiation within that context. The monograph then identifies a wide spectrum of adverse effects of wireless radiation as reported in the premier biomedical literature for over seven decades. Even though many of these reported adverse effects are extremely severe, the true extent of their severity has been grossly underestimated.
Most of the reported laboratory experiments that produced these effects are not reflective of the real-life environment in which wireless radiation operates. Many experiments do not include pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal, and most do not account for synergistic effects of other toxic stimuli acting in concert with the wireless radiation. These two additions greatly exacerbate the severity of the adverse effects from wireless radiation, and their neglect in current (and past) experimentation results in substantial under-estimation of the breadth and severity of adverse effects to be expected in a real-life situation. This lack of credible safety testing, combined with depriving the public of the opportunity to provide informed consent, contextualizes the wireless radiation infrastructure operation as an unethical medical experiment.
Addition of the nascent fifth generation of mobile networking technology (5G) globally to the existing mobile technology network will contribute further to the largest unethical medical experiment in human history!
PDF (1086 Pages): 5G Largest Unethical Medical Experiment Final
This monograph consists of four chapters and eight appendices. Chapter 1 focuses on unethical research, showing how wireless radiation infrastructure implementation fits into the framework of unethical medical experimentation, and providing many examples of other types of unethical medical experimentation.
Chapter 2 is the main technical chapter, focusing on adverse health effects of wireless radiation. It describes:
• adverse effects from past research, and what additional adverse effects can be expected when 5G is implemented fully
• lack of full consensus among key stakeholders on adverse effects from wireless radiation, and the role played by conflicts-of-interest in this lack of consensus
• the main reason that this unethical medical experiment was allowed to take place:
The Federal government that promotes accelerated implementation of wireless radiation technology also 1) sponsors research examining the technology’s potential adverse effects and 2) regulates the technology’s potentially adverse impacts on the public. This unethical promotion-sponsorship-regulation conflict-of-interest lays the groundwork for unethical medical experimentation!
Chapter 3 contains the references for the main text, and Chapter 4 contains the eight appendices.
Appendix 1 presents more details about unethical medical experiments, including examples and many references for further study.
Appendix 2 contains a manual taxonomy of a representative adverse EMF effects database;
Appendix 3 contains a factor analysis taxonomy of the same database; and,
Appendix 4 contains a text clustering taxonomy of the same database. All three taxonomies contain links between the categories in the summary tables and the titles of papers associated with each category.
Appendix 5 shows the potential contribution of wireless radiation to the opioid crisis and potential contribution of wireless radiation to exacerbation of the coronavirus pandemic.
Appendix 6 shows the link between funding source and research outcomes, and presents many references on the topic of funding source-driven bias.
Appendix 7 describes the under-recognized adverse effects of wireless radiation related to medical implants (pacemakers, defibrillators, cochlear implants, dental implants, bone pins, etc) and metal appendages (metal jewelry, etc), and potential micro/nano-implant analogues.
Appendix 8 shows adverse effects of wireless radiation on automotive vehicle occupants (and bystanders), and the under-advertised on-board and external sources of this radiation.
CITATION TO MONOGRAPH
Kostoff RN. The largest unethical medical experiment in human history. 2020. PDF. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/62452
COPYRIGHT AND CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
COPYRIGHT
Copyright © 2020 by Ronald N. Kostoff
Printed in the United States of America; First Printing, 2020
CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
This work can be copied and redistributed in any medium or format provided that credit is given to the original author. For more details on the CC BY license, see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>.
DISCLAIMERS
The views in this monograph are solely those of the author, and do not represent the views of the Georgia Institute of Technology.
PREFACE
Humanity is racing along two parallel paths to self-destruction: 1) accelerating irreversible climate change, and 2) rapidly increasing exposure to health and life-threatening mixtures of toxic stimuli. The most ubiquitous constituent of these toxic mixtures is wireless radiation, which is proceeding to blanket humanity and its ecological life support chain.
A small fraction of the population has given informed consent to wireless radiation exposure, gambling (like users of cigarettes, cocaine, fentanyl) that they can escape the severe adverse consequences of exposure. Another small fraction of the population has not given informed consent, but receives harmful second-hand exposure because of the broad-scale transmission of wireless radiation from terrestrial and satellite sources. The vast majority of the population has given Mis-informed Consent to this exposure. This mis-information is supplied by the telecommunications industry, its lobbyists, its government partners, its political enablers, its marketing arm (the mainstream media), and even some academic enablers.
While research over the past seventy+ years has shown hard evidence of severe adverse effects from wireless radiation, the full extent of the damage from existing wireless radiation infrastructure is not known, much less the damage expected from 4G/5G infrastructure being implemented rapidly today. Attempting to identify the full extent of these adverse effects is the global medical experiment being conducted today. The fact that this experiment is being conducted with mis-informed consent makes it an unethical medical experiment. Because of the magnitude of this experiment, it is the largest unethical medical experiment in human history!
Chapter 1 of this monograph presents the case for wireless radiation infrastructure implementation without credible safety testing being not only an unethical medical experiment, but the largest in human history. It presents wireless radiation infrastructure implementation in the context of other recent examples of unethical medical experiments, and shows how these others pale in comparison to the projected suffering and lethality from wireless radiation exposure based on even the incomplete biomedical data gathered to date.
Chapter 2 is the main technical chapter in this monograph. It covers a broad scope of adverse health and life-supporting ecological effects from wireless radiation, mainly at communications frequencies. Some of these adverse effects are not well-known to the general public, but they are important nevertheless. While the majority of the chapter is technical, its initial section provides the context for evaluating the biomedical literature results. In particular, it emphasizes the conflicts-of-interest operable in all aspects of the wireless radiation biomedical research process, ranging from the initial health-effects research sponsorship to the final research results dissemination in the premier technical literature and other forums. As Chapter 2 shows, we have known about the adverse health and ecological effects of wireless radiation exposure for seventy+ years, but decision-makers of all stripes have nevertheless chosen to impose this health and life-threatening toxic stimulus on an unsuspecting global populace.
Additionally, there are eight appendices. The copious material contained in the appendices supports the statements made in the main text (Chapters 1 and 2). Three sub-appendices, while grounded in hard evidence, are somewhat more hypothetical than the rest. They include 1) linkages between wireless radiation exposure and exacerbation of the opioid crisis and the coronavirus pandemic, and 2) potentially enhanced heating and temperature increases to thermally-damaging levels from short RF pulses and tissue-imbedded nanoparticles. My purpose in presenting these three more hypothetical sub-appendices is to stimulate more discussion, and especially more research, on the nature and validity of these linkages.
Finally, it is my hope that this monograph receives the widest distribution, especially among those who have 1) been the targets of this decades-long mis-information campaign and 2) given their consent to wireless radiation exposure based upon mis-information. It is this segment of the public whose informed actions could reverse the increasing implementation of wireless radiation infrastructure, and prevent the infliction of even more damage, since the other stakeholders involved in the promotion of wireless radiation infrastructure have shown little desire to protect the public against the known and projected ravages of wireless radiation.
Ronald N. Kostoff, Gainesville, VA, 15 February 2020
PREFACE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Chapter 1 – Unethical Research
1A. Monograph Overview
1B. Unethical Research
1B1. Broad Definition
1B2. Informed Consent
1B3. Examples of Unethical Medical Experimentation
Chapter 2 – Adverse Impacts of Wireless Radiation
2A. Overview
2A1. The Context of Wireless Radiation Health and Safety Research
2B. Wireless Radiation/Electromagnetic Spectrum
2C. Modern Non-Ionizing EMF Radiation Exposures
2D. Demonstrated Biological and Health Effects from Prior Generations of Wireless Networking Technology
2D1. Limitations of Previous Wireless Radiation Health Effects Studies
2D2. Adverse Health Effects Identified in Major Review Studies
2D3. Adverse Health Effects from Open Literature Analysis
2D4. Adverse Wireless Radiation Health Effects from Former USSR Literature Analysis
2E. Potential Adverse Health Effects Expected from 5G Mobile Networking Technology
2F. Why is there not Full Consensus on Adverse Effects from Wireless Radiation?
2F1. Reasons for Lack of Full Consensus
2F2. The Role of Conflicts-of-Interest in Lack of Full Consensus
2F3. Interpreting Wireless Radiation Health Study Findings
2G. Conclusions
Chapter 3 – References
Chapter 4 – Appendices
Appendix 1 – Unethical Medical Experiments
A1-A. Overview
Appendix 1A – Unethical Medical Experiments – Examples
Appendix 1B – Ethics of Medical Experiments – References
Appendix 2 – Manual Taxonomy of Adverse EMF Effects Database
A2-A. Category Themes
Table A2-1 – Manual Taxonomy
A2-B. Category Record Titles
Appendix 3 – Factor Analysis of Adverse EMF Effects Database
A3-A. Factor Themes
Table A3-1 – Factor Analysis Taxonomy
A3-B. Factor Record Titles
Appendix 4 – Hierarchical Text Clustering Taxonomy of Adverse EMF Effects Database
A4-A. Cluster Themes
Table A4-1 – CLUTO-Based Text Clustering Taxonomy – Top Levels
Table A4-2 – CLUTO-Based Text Clustering Taxonomy – Bottom Levels
A4-B. Cluster Record Titles
Appendix 5 – Wireless Radiation Impact on the Opioid Crisis and Coronavirus Pandemic
Appendix 6 – Funding Source Bias on Research Outcomes
Appendix 7 – Adverse Effects of Wireless Radiation Related to Implants and Appendages
A7-A. Overview
A7-B. Specific Impacts from Passive Implants
A7-B1. Overview
A7-B2. Impacts from Passive Metallic Medical Implants
A7-B3. Impacts from Passive Macro/Nano Implant Analogues
Table A7-1 – Implant Taxonomy
Appendix 8 – Adverse Effects of Automotive-Based Wireless Radiation
A8-A. Overview
A8-B. Specific Automotive Wireless Radiation Sources
Table A8-1 – Appendix 8 References
AUTHOR BIO
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES-1. Overview
We are in the midst of the largest unethical medical experiment in human history. This experiment is the implementation and operation of a global wireless network for communications, surveillance, and other purposes. It is a medical experiment because we do not know the full extent of the adverse health effects that will result from this wireless network implementation and operation. It is an unethical medical experiment because it violates the key ethical medical experiment requirement of ‘informed consent’ from the participants.
Even though the adverse health effects of wireless radiation reported over the past seventy+ years span the range of severity from discomfort to lethality, we do not know the full extent of adverse health effects from this technology because:
Most laboratory experiments aimed at identifying wireless radiation health effects bear no relation to real-life exposures, and are performed under the most benign conditions of
• single stressors (wireless radiation only)
• no pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal
• no synergistic effects of other toxic stimuli acting in concert with the wireless radiation
These experimental deficiencies are compounded by
• lack of access to the global classified literature on adverse health effects from wireless radiation
• lack of knowledge of proprietary basic and advanced studies on adverse health effects from wireless radiation.
The adverse wireless radiation health effects that have been identified already from the incomplete literature openly available are massive in scope and magnitude. They support the conclusion that wireless radiation as already implemented is extremely dangerous to human health. It acts as both a promoter/accelerator and initiator of adverse health effects. Addition of the missing elements described above and more wireless radiation infrastructure will exacerbate further the adverse effects from wireless radiation on
• human health directly through contribution to chronic disease and
• human health indirectly through degradation of the food chain ecosystem.
ES-2. Adverse Impacts of Wireless Radiation on the Most Vulnerable Members of Society
In the spirit of the ‘unethical’ medical experiments described in this monograph,
it is the poor and dispossessed who will suffer the most from wireless radiation exposure.
This is because wireless radiation plays a dual role of initiator and promoter/accelerator of serious disease. In its promoter/accelerator role, it can accelerate the progression of existing serious diseases such as cancer, and/or, through synergy, can produce serious adverse health effects when combined with other toxic stimuli that neither constituent of the combination could produce in isolation.
Many toxic stimuli, such as harsh chemicals, biotoxins, ionizing radiation sources, vibrating machinery, prolonged sitting doing repetitive tasks, high air pollution, etc, are used/experienced by the poorest members of society in their occupations, and many toxic stimuli, such as air pollutants, toxic wastes, etc, are very prevalent in their residential environments. Thus, people who spray pesticides in farm labor or household applications, people who do cleaning with harsh chemicals, people who dispose of hazardous materials, basically, people who do the dirty work in our society and live in dirty environments, are already leading candidates for higher risk of serious diseases. Adding a wireless radiation promoter/accelerator to their residential and occupational environments will radically increase their chances for developing serious diseases. Closing the ‘digital divide’ for them will translate to increased suffering and reduced longevity!
ES-3. Role of Conflicts-of-Interest in the Sponsorship, Conduct, and Dissemination of Wireless Radiation Research
The results shown in the literature cannot be separated from the context in which this research has been sponsored, conducted, and disseminated!
In the USA (and in most, if not all, countries), the two major sponsors of wireless radiation health and safety research are the Federal government and the wireless radiation industry, in that order. Both of these organizations have a strong intrinsic conflict-of-interest with respect to wireless radiation.
The Federal government is a strong promoter of wireless radiation infrastructure development and rapid expansion, most recently supporting accelerated implementation of 5G infrastructure.
The Federal government that promotes accelerated implementation of wireless radiation technology also 1) sponsors research examining the technology’s potential adverse effects and 2) regulates the technology’s potentially adverse impacts on the public. The fact that these development, regulation, and safety functions may be assigned to different Executive Agencies within the Federal government is irrelevant from an independence perspective.
The separate Executive Agencies in the Federal government are like the tentacles of an Octopus; they operate synchronously under one central command.
The wireless promoters’ main objectives of developing and implementing the technology rapidly are enabled by suppressing knowledge (to the public) of potential adverse effects from the technology’s operation. These fundamental conflicts impact the objectivity of the health and safety R&D sponsors and performers. Any Federal research sponsor of wireless radiation technology safety would be highly conflicted between 1) a desire to satisfy Executive and Legislative objectives of accelerating expansion of wireless radiation technology and implementation and 2) sponsoring objective research focused on identifying and reporting adverse effects of wireless radiation expected under real-life conditions. Likewise, any sponsored research performer addressing wireless radiation technology safety would be highly conflicted between 1) reporting the actual adverse effects expected under real-life conditions and 2) the desire to satisfy wireless radiation promotional objectives of the research sponsors in order to maintain long-range funding.
ES-4. Adverse Health Effects from Wireless Radiation Exposure.
In aggregate, for the high frequency (radiofrequency-RF) part of the spectrum, expert reviews show that RF radiation below the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) exposure guidelines can result in:
-carcinogenicity (brain tumors/glioma, breast cancer, acoustic neuromas, leukemia, parotid gland tumors),
-genotoxicity (DNA damage, DNA repair inhibition, chromatin structure),
-mutagenicity, teratogenicity,
-neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer’s Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis),
-neurobehavioral problems, autism,
-reproductive problems, pregnancy outcomes,
-oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, blood-brain barrier disruption
-pineal gland/melatonin production, sleep disturbance, headache,
-irritability, fatigue, concentration difficulties, depression, dizziness, tinnitus,
-burning and flushed skin, digestive disturbance, tremor, cardiac irregularities, and can
-adversely impact the neural, circulatory, immune, endocrine, and skeletal systems.
The effects range from myriad feelings of discomfort to life-threatening diseases. From this perspective, RF exposure is a highly pervasive cause of disease!
ES-5. Adverse Impacts of Wireless Radiation on the Food Chain
The struggle for survival of human life on Earth is dependent on the logistical food supply chain. At the foundation of this supply chain (before the farmers become involved in harvesting its bounty) are the insects, seeds, flora, trees, etc, that enable the bountiful growth of the myriad potential foods. If the integrity of this foundational logistical supply chain is threatened in any way, then both the animals and plant products we consume become unavailable.
There is a substantial literature on the adverse impacts of wireless radiation on this foundational logistical supply chain. These adverse effects are from the pre-5G wireless radiation exposures, and would include enhanced coupling from the higher frequency harmonics of the RF signal. Many of these supply chain elements (e.g., insects, seeds, larvae, etc) are very small, and we could expect enhanced resonance/energy coupling with the shorter-wavelength 5G radiation when implemented. This indirect impact of wireless radiation may turn out to be at least as (if not more) important as the direct impact of wireless radiation on human survival!
From a broader perspective, most of the laboratory experiment component of the wireless radiation adverse effects literature can be viewed as related to the foundational food supply chain. Much of this research is focused on mice, rats, insects, small birds, small fish, etc. These species tend to be prey of larger animals/fowl/fish, and eventually make their way to the human food table. Any environmental factor that affects the health of these species adversely will eventually impact the humans who are at the end of that chain. In reality, we have accumulated a massive literature describing the adverse impacts of wireless radiation on myriad contributing components to our food supply, and the results do not bode well for our future ability to feed the growing world’s population!
ES-6. Adverse Impacts of Wireless Radiation on Medical and Non-Medical Implants
There were two major types of medical implants covered by the database articles showing adverse effects: active implants that produced electrical signals mainly for controlling heart irregularities (e.g., pacemakers, defibrillators) and hearing deficiencies (e.g., cochlear implants), and passive metallic implants for structural support (e.g., dental implants, bone pins, plates, etc). Additionally, there are articles addressing adverse effects from wireless radiation in the vicinity of metallic appendages (e.g., metallic eyeglasses, metallic jewelry, etc).
The external EMF (electromagnetic fields) from microwaves (and other sources) could 1) impact the electrical operation of the active medical implants adversely, 2) increase the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) values of tissue in the vicinity of the passive implants substantially because of resonance effects, and 3) increase the flow and acidity of saliva in the vicinity of dental structures. While the EMF effects on the cochlear implants could adversely affect auditory capability, EMF effects on the heart-related implants could potentially be life-threatening. The increased SAR values around the passive metal implants could result in increased tissue temperatures, and could adversely impact integration and longevity of the passive metallic implants.
In the mouth, the combination of 1) increased tissue temperatures in proximity to the implant or other orthodontic structures and 2) increased flow rate and acidity of saliva could lead to 3) increased leaching of heavy metals (a known contributor to serious diseases). This also raises the question: what other adverse health effects from the exposure of both the active and passive implants to increasing levels of wireless radiation have not been identified or addressed?
There is a third class of structures whose interaction physics with RF are related to those of the passive implants. These are termed implant analogues, and include myriad exogenous particles (mainly nanoparticles) that penetrate, and imbed in, the skin. The resultant nanoparticle-imbedded tissues have the potential for increased energy absorption from the incoming RF signal, thereby resulting in potentially increased thermal damage over and above the thermal damage resulting from the pulsed high-peak-to-average power of the RF signal. Additionally, more research needs to be done to ascertain the magnitudes of these thermal transients and associated stresses, in order to estimate the levels of enhanced potential damage from RF radiation.
ES-7. Studies in the USSR on Wireless Radiation Health Effects
Much research examining potential adverse effects from wireless radiation, especially in the athermal parameter range, was performed in the USSR as far back as seventy+ years ago. Their results confirm the wide scope of adverse effects reported in recent years and summarized in the present monograph. Unfortunately, their results appear to have had little effect in influencing wireless radiation safety standards in the USA and many other countries.
ES-8. Adverse Effects Expected from Addition of 5G to Existing Communications Networks
The potential 5G adverse health effects derive from the intrinsic nature of the radiation, and how this radiation interacts with tissue and other target structures. 4G networking technology was associated mainly with carrier frequencies in the range of ~1-2.5 GHz (cell phones, WiFi). The wavelength of 1 GHz radiation is 30 cm, and the penetration depth in human tissue is a few centimeters. The highest performance 5G networking technology (millimeter wave) is mainly associated with carrier frequencies at least an order of magnitude above the 4G frequencies, although, as stated in Chapter 2, “ELFs (0–3000Hz) are always present in all telecommunication EMFs in the form of pulsing and modulation”. Penetration depths for the high-performance carrier frequency component of 5G radiation (aka high-band) will be on the order of a few millimeters.
For much of the early implementation of 5G, and perhaps later, 5G will be integrated with 4G. Some vendors will start out/have started out with ‘low-band’ 5G (~600-900 MHz); some will start out with ‘mid-band’ 5G (~2.5 GHz-4.2 GHz); and some will start out with ‘high band’ 5G (~24-47 GHz). All these modes are associated with potentially severe adverse health effects, and none have been tested for safety in any credible manner.
At the millimeter carrier wavelengths characteristic of high-band high-performance 5G, one can expect resonance phenomena with small-scale human structures, as well as resonances with insects/insect components, seeds, etc.
The common ‘wisdom’ being presented in the literature and the broader media is that, if there are adverse impacts resulting from millimeter-wave 5G, the main impacts will be focused on near-surface phenomena, such as skin cancer, cataracts, and other skin conditions, because of shallow RF penetration depths. However, there is evidence that biological responses to millimeter-wave irradiation can be initiated within the skin, and the subsequent systemic signaling in the skin can result in physiological effects on the nervous system, heart, and immune system. There is additional evidence that adverse effects from millimeter-wave radiation can occur in organs and tissue well below the skin surface. This should not be surprising, since there are myriad signaling conduits connecting the skin to deeper structures in the body.
ES-9. Lack of Full Consensus on Wireless Radiation Adverse Effects
Not all studies of wireless radiation have shown adverse effects on health. There are many possibilities to explain this.
1) There could be ‘windows’ in parameter space where adverse effects occur, and the studies/experiments were conducted outside these ‘windows’. Operation outside these windows could show
• no effects or
• hormetic effects or
• therapeutic effects.
The single stressor studies that constitute most of wireless radiation laboratory health research, and indeed constitute most of the laboratory medical research literature, essentially yield very narrow windows. Adverse effects are identified over very limited parameter ranges, and adverse effects shown by many combinations of stressors are not revealed when these stressors are tested in isolation over the same parametric ranges.
One could conclude that, whether by design or accident, the real-world impact of single stressor studies is to conceal, rather than reveal, many of the more serious adverse health effects of wireless radiation.
The stressor variables to be used for health studies should not be limited to single stressors in isolation, but should include to the extent possible combinations of toxic stimuli stressors, since these combinations reflect more accurately real-life exposures.
2) Research quality could be poor, and adverse effects were overlooked.
3) Or, the research team could have had a preconceived agenda
where finding no adverse effects from wireless radiation was the main objective of the research!
ES-10. Potential Links of Wireless Radiation to Enhancement of Opioid Crisis
The previous findings reported in this Executive Summary are based on hard evidence and have been validated in numerous studies. The present section is based on hard evidence as well, but the link of wireless radiation to the opioid crisis is not as far along in the validation process. It should be viewed as a hypothesis at this point, and serve as a basis for discussion and further research.
It has been shown many times that one impact of wireless radiation (at myriad frequencies) is release of endogenous opioids. This release of endogenous opioids can enable analgesic effects by itself, or can enhance the analgesic effects of exogenous analgesics. This has been demonstrated at pulsed millimeter-wave frequencies, WiFi frequencies, mobile phone frequencies, radiofrequencies, and extremely low frequencies. Additionally, as has been demonstrated by the results of the current monograph, wireless radiation at all the above frequencies has resulted in serious mid-term and especially long-term adverse health effects.
Therefore, wireless radiation exposure, especially at cell phone, WiFi, and millimeter-wave pulsed and modulated frequencies, generates 1) analgesic and pleasurable short-term effects and 2) serious adverse mid- and long-term effects. There would be some exceptions for the short-term, such as electrohypersensitivity (EHS) sufferers, who are immediately affected adversely and strongly by wireless radiation exposure.
For most people, the enhanced analgesic short-term effects of the wireless radiation would in effect mask the long-term damage from this radiation.
As time proceeds, the increasing discomfort from the adverse mid-and long-term effects of wireless radiation requires increasingly stronger analgesics to suppress, and the increasing use of exogenous analgesics becomes necessary. This potentially enhanced use of exogenous analgesics could lead to opioid and/or other analgesic addictions.
ES-11. Potential Links of Wireless Radiation to Current Coronavirus Pandemic
The previous findings reported in this Executive Summary are based on hard evidence and have been validated in numerous studies. The present section is based on hard evidence as well, but the link of wireless radiation to the coronavirus pandemic is not as far along in the validation process. It should be viewed as a hypothesis at this point, and serve as a basis for discussion and further research.
There are on the order of 300,000 viruses, many/most of which have zoonotic potential. To develop vaccines for all of these viruses (before an epidemic or pandemic strikes) is unreasonable (based on present technology) because of the sheer numbers involved. To develop vaccines for any specific virus during an epidemic or pandemic (which was the mainstream approach taken for the coronavirus during the SARS pandemic of 2002-2003) is completely unrealistic, because of the lead times required for vaccine development, efficacy testing, credible mid-and long-term safety testing, and implementation.
Those who succumbed during the SARS pandemic had 1) myriad co-morbidities and 2) weakened immune systems unable to neutralize the SARS coronavirus. Having a strong immune system that allowed a smooth transition from innate immune system operation to adaptive immune system operation was the one intrinsic defense that worked! The SARS experience showed that the best and most realistic approach for defense against any potential viral attack is reversing immune-degrading lifestyles well before any pandemic or epidemic outbreaks. In that case, the immune system would be sufficiently strong to be able to handle viral exposure on its own without the emergence of serious symptoms, as was the case with those exposed to the SARS coronavirus (with coronavirus antibodies in their serum) who exhibited no (or minimal) symptoms.
This gets to the link between wireless radiation exposure and the latest coronavirus pandemic. To the degree that non-ionizing radiation exposure, superimposed on the myriad toxic stimuli to which many people are exposed by choice or imposition, degrades the operation of the innate and adaptive immune systems, it would increase the likelihood that the immune system could not counteract the exposure to the coronavirus (or any virus) as nature intended. Thus, it would contribute to the exacerbation of adverse effects from coronavirus exposure. The bottom line is that exposures to essentially ALL the exogenous immune-damaging toxic stimuli (including, but not limited to, wireless radiation) need to be removed before resistance to viral exposures of any type can be improved substantially.
ES-12. Adverse Effects of Wireless Radiation in Automotive Sector
The modern automobile is a powerful source of wireless radiation at myriad frequencies, and is subject to external wireless radiation at myriad frequencies as well. The trend has not been to reduce these sources, but rather to add equipment both to the vehicle and to the external environment that will substantially increase the wireless radiation flux associated with the vehicle. The numbers and types of sources are not well-known, even among those experts and laymen concerned about adverse effects from wireless radiation.
An interesting diagram (and narrative) showing radars and other wireless sensors in modern cars can be found at the following link: (http://www.radiationdangers.com/automotive-radiation/automotive-radiation/). I would recommend the reader study that diagram in detail, to better appreciate how ubiquitous are these sources of wireless radiation. Not all the wireless radiation enters the cabin, since some/much is outward-directed, but some/much of it will enter the cabins of other cars on the road.
However, that diagram tells only part of the story. Assume there is a car pool commuting to work from the suburbs of a major city. It is not uncommon (in today’s world) for a one-way trip to take from one-two hours, or more. Even in a regular car, or mid-size SUV, there might be four or so passengers. They may be using cell phones, WiFi, or both, thereby adding to the radiation from the automotive-based sensors/transmitters.
There will be cell towers lining the sides of a major highway, thereby increasing the radiation to the occupants substantially. Depending on conditions, there may be substantial air pollution to which the occupants are exposed. Additionally, the prolonged sitting is very dangerous, and is a contributing factor to many serious diseases. If the vehicle is new, there may be substantial out-gassing of toxic chemicals from the interior materials. Combined exposure to the wireless radiation, air pollution and other toxic substances, coupled with prolonged sitting and continual impacts from the car’s motions, produces a synergistic effect that substantially exacerbates adverse impacts from any of the constituent components.
Chapter 1 – Unethical Research
We are in the midst of the largest unethical medical experiment in human history. This experiment is the implementation and operation of a global wireless network for communications, surveillance, and other purposes. It is a medical experiment because we do not know the full extent of the adverse health effects that will result from this wireless network implementation and operation. It is an unethical medical experiment because it violates the key ethical medical experiment requirement of ‘informed consent’ from the participants.
The current chapter provides 1) some background on the requirements for ethical medical research/experimentation and 2) examples of how those requirements have been violated in the past century. It places wireless radiation implementation and operation in the context of these other examples of unethical medical experiments.
Chapter 2 presents a detailed description of some of the adverse health effects of wireless radiation as reported in the unclassified open literature. Even though the adverse health effects of wireless radiation reported over the past seventy+ years span the range of severity from discomfort to lethality, we do not know the full extent of adverse health effects from this technology because:
Most laboratory experiments aimed at identifying wireless radiation health effects bear no relation to real-life exposures, and are performed under the most benign conditions of
• single stressors (wireless radiation only)
• no pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal
• no synergistic effects of other toxic stimuli acting in concert with the wireless radiation
These experimental deficiencies are compounded by
• lack of access to the global classified literature on adverse health effects from wireless radiation
• lack of knowledge of proprietary basic and advanced studies on adverse health effects from wireless radiation.
As Chapter 2 shows, the adverse wireless radiation health effects that have been identified already from the incomplete literature openly available are massive in scope and magnitude. They support the conclusion that wireless radiation as already implemented is extremely dangerous to human health. It acts as both a promoter/accelerator and initiator of adverse health effects. Addition of the missing elements described above and more wireless radiation infrastructure will exacerbate further the adverse effects from wireless radiation on
• human health directly through contribution to chronic disease and
• human health indirectly through degradation of the food chain ecosystem.
Chapter 3 contains the references for the main text.
Chapter 4 contains eight Appendices:
• Appendix 1 contains examples of unethical medical experiments conducted in the last century, mainly (not entirely) in the USA or under USA auspices;
• Appendix 2 contains a manual taxonomy of the adverse health and biomedical effects component of a representative wireless radiation literature, and is derived in part from the taxonomies in Appendices 3 and 4;
• Appendix 3 contains a taxonomy based on factor analysis of the same representative wireless radiation literature;
• Appendix 4 contains a taxonomy based on text clustering of the same representative wireless radiation literature;
• Appendix 5 shows potential links between wireless radiation exposure and 1) expansion of the opioid crisis and 2) exacerbation of coronavirus pandemic;
• Appendix 6 lists references showing effects of industry funding on research outcomes for myriad (mainly biomedical) research disciplines;
• Appendix 7 overviews the oft-neglected topics of wireless radiation adverse effects on regions containing medical implants (e.g., pacemakers, defibrillators, cochlear implants, dental implants, bone pins, plates, etc) and appendages (e.g., metal eyeglasses, earrings, metal jewelry, etc), as well as other micro/nano exogenous implant analogues;
• Appendix 8 describes adverse effects of automotive-based wireless radiation.
PDF (1086 Pages): 5G Largest Unethical Medical Experiment Final
SHORT URL THIS POST: https://tinyurl.com/5G-Coffin
