Berto Jongman: Carbon Trust Launches Scheme to Tackle Water Waste

12 Water
0Shares
Berto Jongman
Berto Jongman

Carbon Trust launches scheme to tackle water waste

By Mark Kinver Environment reporter, BBC News

An international standard on water reduction has been launched in an effort to order to encourage businesses to use water more sustainably.

The UK's Carbon Trust, which developed the scheme, said many business leaders did not see the issue as a priority.

The Water Standard will require firms to measure water use and demonstrate efforts taken to reduce consumption.

It is estimated that more than 60% of Europe's largest cities consume water faster than it can be replenished.

UN data shows that 70% of global freshwater use is for irrigation, 22% is used by industry and 8% is used in homes.

Water use is forecast to increase in developing nations by 50% by 2025 and by 18% in developed nations.

“We know that most businesses that are very big users of water don't really have a handle on [water stewardship],” explained Carbon Trust chief executive Tom Delay.

“Very few measure it, even fewer have targets to reduce consumption. So even if there is not a significant cost penalty for water use, there is a very significant business risk.”

Read full article.

Phi Beta Iota:  Free energy, clean water, and safe food are the tri-fecta of the future that most are ignoring.  Solutions are available by corrupt governments are continuing to subsidize corrupt legacy systems in these field.

See Also:

Water: Soul of the Earth, Mirror of Our Collective Souls

Patrick Meier: Verily: Crowdsourcing Evidence During Disasters

Crowd-Sourcing
0Shares
Patrick Meier
Patrick Meier

Verily: Crowdsourcing Evidence During Disasters

Social media is increasingly used for communicating during crises. This rise in Big (Crisis) Data means that finding the proverbial needle in the growing haystack of information is becoming a major challenge. Social media use during Hurricane Sandy produced a “haystack” of half-a-million Instagram photos and 20 million tweets. But which of these were actually relevant for disaster response and could they have been detected in near real-time? The purpose of QCRI’s experimental Twitter Dashboard for Disaster Response project is to answer this question. But what about the credibility of the needles in the info-stack?

To answer this question, our Crisis Computing Team at QCRI has partnered with the Social Computing & Artificial Intelligence Lab at the Masdar Institute of Science and Technology. This applied research project began with a series of conversations in mid-2012 about DARPA’s Red Balloon Challenge. This challenge posted in 2009 offered $40K to the individual or team that could find the correct location of 10 red weather balloons discretely placed across the continental United States, an area covering well over 3 million square miles (8 million square kilometers). My friend Riley Crane at MIT spearheaded the team that won the challenge in 8 hours and 52 minutes by using social media.

Riley and I connected right after the Haiti Earthquake to start exploring how we might apply his team’s winning strategy to disaster response. But we were pulled in different directions due to PhD & post-doc obligations and start-up’s. Thank-fully, however, Riley’s colleague Iyad Rahwan got in touch with me to continue these conversations when I joined QCRI. Iyad is now at the Masdar Institute. We’re collaborating with him and his students to apply collective intelligence insights from the balloon to address the problem of false or misleading content shared on social media during  disasters.

If 10 balloons planted across 3 million square miles can be found in under 9 hours, then surely the answer to the question “Did Hurricane Sandy really flood this McDonald’s in Virginia?” can be found in under 9 minutes given that  Virginia is 98% smaller than the “haystack” of the continental US. Moreover, the location of the restaurant would already be known or easily findable. The picture below, which made the rounds on social media during the hurricane is in reality part of an art exhibition produced in 2009. One remarkable aspect of the social media response to Hurricane Sandy was how quickly false information got debunked and exposed as false—not only by one good (digital) Samaritan, but by several.

Read full article with graphics.

Continue reading “Patrick Meier: Verily: Crowdsourcing Evidence During Disasters”

SchwartzReport: Profiting from Human Misery

07 Other Atrocities
0Shares

schwartz reportThis is an essay that gives some flavor of the human experience of the New American Slavery trend. We are paying to create a population of people, numbering into the millions, most of whom come back into society at some point, warped by the American Gulag. Just how crazy is that? The privatization of prisons trend is like a cancer eating away at the social body.

Profiting From Human Misery
Truthdig

INTELLIGENCE with INTEGRITY Chapter 4: Four Domains for Applied Intelligence

Articles & Chapters
0Shares
Fund a Chapter --  Own It
Fund a Chapter — Own It

Utilizar el Traductor de Google en la parte superior de la columna central

Utilisez Google Translate au haut de la colonne du milieu

Google’ın Orta Sütun Top of Çevir kullanın

Используйте Google Translate в верхней части среднего столбца

Sử dụng Google Translate Đầu Cột Trung

उपयोग Google मध्य स्तंभ के शीर्ष पर अनुवाद

在中间一列的顶部,使用谷歌翻译

استخدام جوجل ترجمة في أعلى العمود الأوسط

06 CH 4.1 Strategy 47-56
Book Master Page with All Chapters

DRAFT 1 OF 15

Chapter 4: Four Domains for Applied Intelligence

Funded by Pierre Thibault (ME)

A. Integrity Is a Grand Strategy  47

B.  Grand Strategy  49

C.  Strategy  49

D.  Threats, Goals, Priorities  50

E.  Whole of Government Management  51

F.  Affordable Coherent Acquisition  52

G.  Just Enough Just in Time Operations  53

H.  Strategic Education  53

I.  Strategic Intelligence  54

J.  Strategic Research  54

Anthony Judge: The Cognitive Glass Ceiling — Enabling Questions, Challenged Audiences — Psychic Numbing and the Need for a Transformation of HOW We Think

Collective Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence, Earth Intelligence
0Shares
Anthony Judge
Anthony Judge

We have a challenge before us.  I have invested heavily over decades in engaging with the UN as a rational pattern and pont of influence.  I no longer believe this to be the case.  However much we might succeed in placing the truth before any given organization, the chances of its over-coming built in biases is slim to none.  I have variously argued why this is the case.

Put simply there is zero capacity to absorb information in any collective sense. This constitutes a form of cognitive glass ceiling.

Hence my preoccupation with framing questions otherwise for other audeinces without getting locked intio marketing understandings of impact

One articulation of this (with links) is Embodiment of Change: Comprehension, Traction and Impact?: Discovering enabling questions for the future.

There is a degree of strategic and cognitive paradox required to which various authors refer and I endeavour to cite,.

I recall decades ago the remark of a top UN official to me that It was impossible to move anything of signifiance throygh the decisions processes of the UN system. Hence an early piece of mine on  The Art of Non-Decision-Making and the manipulation of categories.

But I salute your efforts.  Do not give up.

As a further remark, the issue is the capacity for uptake of any new insight.  Even presented on a plate, with a ticking bomb behind it, the capacity for uptake is far lower than we would like to assume.

This for me is the essence of the problem. Seeking greater impact by conventional means will not ensure uptake. People are overloaded with nio time or inclination to absorb new information

I have written variously on the matter, notably in summary form in Governing Civilization through Civilizing Governance: Global challenge for a turbulent future.

Continue reading “Anthony Judge: The Cognitive Glass Ceiling — Enabling Questions, Challenged Audiences — Psychic Numbing and the Need for a Transformation of HOW We Think”

Anthony Judge: Internyet Nescience? Doing the Wrong Things Righter is Still Doing the Wrong Thing

Collective Intelligence, Commercial Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence
0Shares
Anthony Judge
Anthony Judge

Internyet Nescience?

Self-referential upgrading of obsolete Internet conference processes inhibiting emergence of integrative knowledge

Introduction
Internet science?
Methodological possibilities
Representation possibilities
Conclusion
References

Paper originally envisaged for the 1st International Conference on Internet Science (10-13 April 2013, Brussels)
held under the aegis of the European Commission, by the EINS project, the FP7 European Network of Excellence in Internet Science.

Read full paper with many links.