Berto Jongman: Frederick Kagan on Why US Has Failed to Defeat Al Qaeda

01 Poverty, 02 Infectious Disease, 03 Environmental Degradation, 04 Inter-State Conflict, 05 Civil War, 06 Genocide, 07 Other Atrocities, 08 Proliferation, 09 Terrorism, 10 Transnational Crime, Corruption, Government, Military, Peace Intelligence
Berto Jongman
Berto Jongman

Missing the Target: Why the US Has Not Defeated al Qaeda

Frederick W. Kagan, TESTIMONY

American Enterprise Institute, 8 April 2014

All conditions are set for a series of significant terrorist attacks against the US and its allies over the next few years. But that’s not the worst news. Conditions are also set for state collapse in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and possibly Jordan. Saudi Arabia, facing a complex succession soon, is likely to acquire nuclear weapons shortly, if it has not already done so. Turkey and Egypt confront major crises. Almost all of Northern and Equatorial Africa is violent, unstable, and facing a growing al Qaeda threat. And Vladimir Putin’s assault on Ukraine is likely to empower al Qaeda-aligned jihadists in Crimea and in Russia itself. That eventuality is, of course, less worrisome than the prospect of conventional and partisan war on the European continent, likely threatening NATO allies. The international order and global stability are collapsing in a way we have not seen since the 1930s. There is little prospect of this trend reversing of its own accord, and managing it will require massive efforts by the US and its allies over a generation or more.

This distressing context is essential for considering the al Qaeda threat today. On the one hand, it makes that threat look small. The long – term effects of global chaos and conflict among hundreds of millions of people across Europe, Africa, and the Middle East on US security, interests, and way of life are surely greater than any damage al Qaeda is likely to do to us in the immediate future. Yet the two threats feed each other powerfully. Disorder and conflict in the Muslim world breed support for al Qaeda, which is starting to look like the strong horse in Iraq and even in Syria. Al Qaeda groups and their allies, on the other hand, powerfully contribute to the collapse of state structures and the emergence of horrific violence and Hobbesian chaos wherever they operate. They are benefiting greatly from the regional sectarian war they intentionally triggered (the destruction of the Samarra Mosque in 2006 was only the most spectacular of a long series of efforts by al Qaeda in Iraq to goad Iraq’s Shi’a into sectarian conflict , for which some Shi’a militants, to be sure, were already preparing) — and have been continuing to fuel.

Al Qaeda is like a virulent pathogen that opportunistically attacks bodies weakened by internal strife and poor governance, but that further weakens those bodies and infects others that would not otherwise have been susceptible to the disease. The problem of al Qaeda cannot be separated from the other crises of our age, nor can it be quarantined or rendered harmless through targeted therapies that ignore the larger problems.

Yet that is precisely how the Obama administration has been trying to deal with al Qaeda.

PDF (6 Pages): 20140408 Kagan on Why US Has Not Defeated Al Qaeda

Phi Beta Iota: Brother Kagan is strongest as a worst case proponent for the general failure of US strategy, policy, and operations. The fact is the US does not have a holistic understanding of all threats, it does not have a strategy or whole of government approach to anything, and it is largely hypocritical and corrupt in its foreign dealings, favoring dictators and corrupt elites over legitimate commerce and the public interest. Where Brother Kagan fails terribly is in confusing his belief that al Qaeda suffers from a flawed ideology with (instead of) the possibility that we all suffer from a lack of legitimacy; and in his bombastic baloney about needing to protect NSA as part of our defenses. The lack of intelligence with integrity in the USA is a major part of our problem. As CEO Bob Seelert of Satchi and Satchi likes to say, “Until you get the truth on the table, no matter how ugly it is, you cannot deal with it.” The IC is in the business of keeping the problems alive to keep the moneyh moving, and Brother Binney likes to day — it is not in the business of decision-support. [Regardless of the corruption of the policy side of the house, amply documented by, among others, Brother Pillar, it is incumbent on US intelligence professionals who have sworn an oath to defend and protect the Constitution, to get it right. That is not happening.

Aide Memoir: The ten high level threats to humanity, in priority order but demanding harmonized action, are:

Ten High-Level Threats
Ten High-Level Threats

See Also:

Max Manwaring: Translating Lessons Learned in Colombia and Other Wars Among the People: Confronting the Spectrum of 21st Century Conflict

Reference: Max Manwaring on Strategy & Insurgency

2003 Manwaring (US) War & Conflict: Six Generations

2002 Manwaring (US) Asymmetry, Conflict, and the Need to Achieve Both Vertical and Horizonal Integration

Review: A More Secure World–Our Shared Responsibility–Report of the Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change

Review: Inequality, Grievances, and Civil War

Review: Other Inconvenient Truths Beyond Global Warming