“9/11” goes credible
John, a few yrs back you were posting doubts about the official explanations (both Norad and Nist have changed their stories) of 9/11, but not in a long time. I can imagine many reasons to abandon the discussion, like not upsetting some of your readers, but I just wanted to point out that back then the debate was dominated by speculation, but that in recent years the Truth movement has been professionalized by such orgs as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (some 1500 members risking their careers), Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Scholars for 9/11 Truth, etc., as well as peer-reviewed scientific articles. I'd be interested in your thoughts on the subject nowadays.
One thing I noticed at the Transpartisan Conference we attended was the inspiration for this web page I made: which has links to many of those organizations.
Phi Beta Iota: We have known from day one, because of Dick Cheney's scheduling a counter-terrorism “exercise” for “the day” but doing so at least three months in advance, that this was an orchestrated event with US Government complicity. Most of the Industrial Era mind-sets in the USA are still in denial over this, but consciousness is rising, and the truth cannot be buried. Just as we now know more about the assassination of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, just as we now know the details of the Israeli attack and US cover-up on the USS Liberty, so also will the full details of 9-11 eventually be known to and embraced by the public at large. 9-11, and the economic meltdown orchestrated by Goldman Sachs and the US Treasury (run by Goldman Sachs for the last several administrations) are the tail end of Industrial Era “rule by secrecy.” Public intelligence–collective intelligence–is now maturing quickly, and is the non-violent alternative to dysfunctional hierarchies that are not agile, do not scale, and are incapable of creating a prosperous world at peace–for that, we must turn to hybrid networks of ethical humans.