Global Warming False Alarm: The Bad Science Behind the United Nations' Assertion that Man-made CO2 Causes Global Warming
In language that a layman can understand, Ralph Alexander explains how the whole global warming claim got started, who started it, and how it has been maintained by too many scientists (and others) using deliberately false or distorted science. – Bookviews by Alan Caruba
Heaven and Earth: Global Warming, the Missing Science
‘This is a very powerful, clear, understandable and extremely useful book . . . [Plimer] convincingly criticizes the UN, the IPCC, U.K. and U.S. politicians, as well as Hollywood show business celebrities. He strictly distinguishes science from environmental activism, politics, and opportunism.'—Vaclav Klaus, President, The European Union
Dr. Richard Lindzen–Professor of Meteorology at M.I.T., member, the National Research Council Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, says global warming alarmists “are trumpeting catastrophes that couldn't happen even if the models were right.” … and many others
Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed
From the author of the New York Times bestselling Politically Incorrect Guide(tm) to Global Warming (and Environmentalism) comes Red Hot Lies, an exposé of the hypocrisy, deceit, and outright lies of the global warming alarmists and the compliant media that support them. Did you know that most scientists are global warming skeptics? Or that environmental alarmists have knowingly promoted false and exaggerated data on global warming? Or that in the Left's efforts to suppress free speech (and scientific research), they have compared global warming dissent with “treason”? Shocking, frank, and illuminating, Chris Horner's Red Hot Lies explodes as many myths as Al Gore promotes.
Phi Beta Iota: The science on both sides of this issue leaves much to be desired, but on sheerfraud and misrepresentation, those inflating global warming appear to have no peers. Three key points:
1) Climate change may be the single most complex “system” within the Whole Earth system of systems, and to pretend that anyone is anywhere close to understanding it is to be naive or fraudulent.
2) Whole Systems require whole systems thinking–it is NOT possible to analyze and correct one piece of the whole system in isolation without the very high likelihood both both being wrong and doing enormous damage to the other parts. The IPCC is flawed because the UN is flawed–the UN still has not implemented the Brahimi Report, nor begun to address seriously the idea of Quincy Wright for a World Intelligence Center. Earth Intelligence Network tries to do that, but absent “buy in” by someone of the caliber of Sir Richard Branson, we will probably continue to both lie to each other, and fail to grasp the Whole System.
3) Nothing the UN, Denmark, the US, or any other country matters a tinker's damn if we do not create a strategic analytic model and a process for getting a grip on all information in all languages all the time such that the eight demographic powers (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Iran, Russia, Venezuela, and Wild Cards) are catalyzed, into avoiding the mistakes of the Industrial West and inspired to leverage their own five billion poor to create natural capitalism and achieve evolutionary integral consciousness.