Review: The Bhagavad Gita–A Walkthrough for Westerners

5 Star, Consciousness & Social IQ, Cosmos & Destiny, Information Society, Intelligence (Public), Nature, Diet, Memetics, Design, Peace, Poverty, & Middle Class, Politics, Power (Pathologies & Utilization), Priorities, Religion & Politics of Religion, Secrecy & Politics of Secrecy, Strategy, Survival & Sustainment, True Cost & Toxicity, Truth & Reconciliation, Values, Ethics, Sustainable Evolution, Voices Lost (Indigenous, Gender, Poor, Marginalized)
Amazon Page
5.0 out of 5 stars Speak the Truth, Lose the Anger, Be Part of the Whole
February 10, 2010
Jack Hawley

It took me fifty years to recognize the deficiencies of the command and control or top down elite-dominated model of governance, and to discover the spiritual and practical integrity of collective intelligence, openness, appreciative inquirty, deliberative public dilaog, and so on. It's taken another seven years to discover detachment from outcome, and that in turn set the stage for what I find to be the absolute essence of this book: speaking truth to power is half the battle, losing the anger is the other half. Harder to do than it sounds, this Westernized version of the Bhagavad Gita does help.

Here are the two paragraphs I pulled from page 129 and then 147 for intelligence (decision-support) professionals:

“Those who transcend the gunas are in essence watchers, beyond the worldly. Although constantly aware of the inevitable cycle of birth, disease, senility, grief, and so forth, they dwell above it all, and merely witness it.

My personal take on the above is that sacred dispassion is a prerequisite for both spirtual vision and professional integrity.

“Always tell the truth, Arjuna, and present it in as pleasant a way as possible. If you cannot do that, remain silent. If something absolutely needs to be said, you must uphold the truth, but find a way to do it that is gentle and obliging.”

Talk about one's life flashing past–A for truth, F for gentle. Something to work on in my last 20 years.
Continue reading “Review: The Bhagavad Gita–A Walkthrough for Westerners”

Journal: Commandant of US Coast Guard on Haiti

Gift Intelligence, Peace Intelligence
Marcus Aurelius

Full Interview Online

ADM Allen is arguably the most credible and capable individual in the U.S. Government with respect to disaster relief.

Haiti response effort brings lessons from Katrina

When the after-action reviews of the recent catastrophic earthquake in Haiti are finally written, the tragedy will likely prove another major milestone in gauging U.S. disaster response. For an early preview, National Journal spoke with the man tasked with salvaging the Katrina operation and an insider during the Haiti crisis, Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Thad Allen. Edited excerpts from that interview follow.

Phi  Beta Iota: It is clear from this interview that the emphasis was on extracting Americans rather than orchestrating aid to the Haitians.  That is very helpful.  Lessons learned from Haiti remain to be documented at a multinational and regional level.

Journal: Wall Street Dumps Democrats

Uncategorized
Chuck Spinney
Full Story Online

He was bought an paid for by Wall Street … and now,… Chuck

Robert Scheer's Columns

Wall Street Wants a Refund

“Buyer’s remorse” is the way Sen. John Cornyn, the Senate Republicans’ fundraiser, gleefully refers to Wall Street moguls’ current disenchantment with the U.S. president they thought they had bought. They didn’t like it when Barack Obama, after a year of throwing trillions of American taxpayer dollars into the bailout sinkhole, dared remark that he had hoped there might be some return for ordinary folks trying to save their jobs and homes. Not just huge bonuses for the folks the president dared refer to as “fat cats.”

“That’s it!” the moguls declared, and promptly shifted their political donations from Democrats to Republicans. Among the unglued was Jamie Dimon, who, as The New York Times put it, “is a friend of President Obama’s from Chicago, a frequent White House guest and a big Democratic donor.” Dimon, who just gave himself a $17 million bonus for last year’s work—after his bank was bailed out by taxpayers—is the chief executive of JPMorgan Chase. As the Times observed: “If the Democratic Party has a stronghold on Wall Street it is JPMorgan Chase. … But this year Chase’s political action committee is sending the Democrats a pointed message. … [I]t has rebuffed solicitations from the national Democratic House and Senate campaign committees. Instead it gave $30,000 to their Republican counterparts.” Chump change, given the hundreds of millions that Wall Street doles out to buy legislation, but a warning shot nonetheless.

Phi Beta Iota: Unless the public gets back in the business of governance, Wall Street will continue to play one of the two parties against the other while screwing the 70% of us that did not vote for the token theater group nominally in power–whether Republican or Democrat.  See 2008 ELECTION 2008: Lipstick on the Pig for free chapters relevant to this challenge.

MILNET Headlines 9 February 2010

Uncategorized

Afghanistan: U.S. Enlists Ex-Foes For Afghan Army

Cyber-Security: How To: Smuggle Secret Information with VOIP

Cyber-Security: Security chip that does encryption in PCs hacked

Cyber-Security: Sweden Probing Cisco, NASA Hacks

Terrorism: ‘We need no lectures' Administration disrupts terrorists’ plots, takes fight to them abroad

Threat-China: China PLA officers urge economic punch against U.S.

Threat-Economic: China's Debt Bomb

Threat-Iran: Iran’s Two-Edged Bomb

Tools: Haiti Relief’s Secret Weapon: Google Earth

Tools: Why the Army Doesn’t Train on Xboxes

Tools: With Darpa’s ‘Transparent Earth,’ Underground Doesn’t Mean Out of Sight

US Accountability: Court Keeps White House Spy Docs Secret

US Leadership: Key Figure in Bush’s Military Commissions Set for Obama Job

US Leadership: National Security Team Fails To Inspire Confidence

US Politics: ‘Miss Me Yet?' Billboard With Photo Of Bush Is Real; Not An Internet Trick

Search: four levels intelligence analysis

Searches

Although the search works, it's such an important line of inquiry that we've decided to create this direct post.  Thank you for seeking this.  Credit first:  Edward N. Luttwak's brilliant Strategy–The Logic of War and Peace, Revised and Enlarged Edition was the first effort to not just distinguish between the four levels of analysis (strategic, operational, tactical, and technical) but to show how capabilities at different levels that might be insufficient on their own (e.g. a man-held bazooka against tanks at the tactical level) actually created a coherent whole when combined with capabilities at others levels (artillery, aviation, fuel interdiction).

Here is a clean short list responsive to your search, aided by the human in the loop:

Graphic: OSINT Support to Four Levels of Analysis

Graphic: Expeditionary Environment Analytic Model

Graphic: Threat Level Changes Depending on the Level of Analysis

1990 Expeditionary Environment Analytic Model

Search: Strategic Analytic Model

2010: OPINION–America’s Cyber Scam

Articles & Chapters
Link Restored

by Robert David Steele

Tuesday, 09 February 2010

It's time to get real about cybersecurity

I am quite certain that a careful examination of all extant SOWs would reveal a degree of obscurity and incoherence confirming that the US Government is engaged in a massive collective self-deception and entertaining bids for vaporware amidst a climate of fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD), the latter a tactic of rhetoric and fallacy used in sales, marketing, public relations, politics and propaganda.

In my judgment, informed by consultation with a few colleagues and a simple review of the open record, there are fewer than 100 people in the USA who could be called legitimate cybernauts and are qualified for appropriate security clearances.

Below is a table of the top eight US centers on cybersecurity (research-wise) with the observation that not a single one of them is on the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) list of  “centers of excellence.

TABLE

How many of them work at the code level? Out of the 213 faculty, and 191 PhD candidates, only 25 faculty and 38 PhD candidates are doing advanced and seriously interesting research at the code-level (in cybersecurity only – I didn't count other forms of code research). So the army for the coming war to be funded at $12 billion a year is: 63. How much cheaper would it be to simply pay them directly and give them a few million each to nurture both US and foreign students with a gift for code?

These constitute the “lower code” level of warfare where it really matters. However, only 20 percent of them are working on counter-offensive research (that's 12 people for a population of 300 million, never mind the global grid we depend on). Twelve people. I do not make this stuff up!

Below the line: safety copy; or see Google Cache

Continue reading “2010: OPINION–America's Cyber Scam”