
With them, force is.
STARTING POINT: Tom Atlee: Systemic Causation & Sandy
IDEN A: I like the distinction between direct causation and systemic causation. However, I would prefer a general conception of causation. I would say that ideas about causes assume a stable world. We assume that what happened in the past will happen in the future. But if the world is changing (i.e., global warming, sea level rise), causation changes (i.e., frequency or severity of storms). To plan for the future requires knowing how the world is changing, which is difficult when our actions are changing the world. We will live in a world we have not experienced previously. We can imagine how change will proceed, but we can be certain that we will not be 100% correct. I very much agree with Tom's emphasis on the importance of language and, in this case, systems thinking.
IDEN B: It sounds like we must be master mariners in a great sea, understanding the theory of change, knowing that it can change at difference paces across different functions, and always being sensitive to the implications of weather patterns, recognizing there is only so much we can do BUT also recognizing that the more prepared we are the easier our path…..building smaller homes that are hurricane proof, having self-contained water and energy systems, etcetera.
Continue reading “Yoda: Dynamic Causation vs. Systemic Causation”







