2009 Defense Science Board Report on Understanding Human Dynamics

Defense Science Board, Military

This report is so out-of-character for the Defense Science Board (DSB), and yet so vital to the emerging concept of “full-spectrum” Human Intelligence (HUMINT), that we consider it a “must read.”  It may well be one of the most important DSB reports of the decade.  It inventories the mish-mash of endeavors that presume to collect, process, analyze, and exploit intelligence about humans and their social networks.  Reading between the lines, it is clear that a) DoD has no idea what it is doing in this area; and b) DoD has no bench, anywhere.  The report is beautifully put together and  provides a fine high-level review of the importance of leadership, inter-agency sharing and understanding, internal education, the importance of recovering lessons learned from the past and not lsing the hard-earned lessons re-learned.  We've had this report printed, it will be read more than once.  Of greatest interest from a Public Intelligence point of view as well as a HUMINT point of view (see our draft paper HUMAN INTELLIGENCE (HUMINT): All Humans, All Minds, All the Time), is the repeat–that's important–they are repeating prior recommendation in prior repor(s) of the need for a Center for Global Engagement.  The downside is that this will become another Human Terrain Team (HTT) turd in the punchbowl.  However, if it were handled properly, as a sister element to the emerging Defense Intelligence Open Source Program (DIOSPO), and it were fully multinational as briefing to the Coalition Coordination Center (CCC) in Tampa, then it might be a huge help to the Secretary across all fronts including acquisition and Whole of Government Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Campaigning (PPBC).

HUMINT 101
HUMINT 101

2009 Intelligence for the President–AND Everyone Else [Full Text Online for Google Translate]

About the Idea, Articles & Chapters, Collaboration Zones, Communities of Practice, Reform
Full Article Online
Full Article Online

Intelligence for the President–AND Everyone Else

How Obama Can Create a Smart Nation and a Prosperous World at Peace

By ROBERT DAVID STEELE VIVAS

Today’s secret intelligence community costs the U.S. taxpayer over $65 billion a year, and yet, according to General Tony Zinni, USMC (Ret), provides less than 4% of the decision support needed by a major government executive. This is the same community that has violated the Constitution at least three times, with warrantless wiretapping, rendition for torture, and more recently, a homeland surveillance grid that is a hair away from effecting a police state. This is the same community that is completely useless as a source of objective information able to help the President and those purporting to represent the public in connecting means (revenue) with ways (spending) and ends (outcomes).

Full Text Below the Line

Continue reading “2009 Intelligence for the President–AND Everyone Else [Full Text Online for Google Translate]”

2008 Defense Science Board Report on Integrating Sensor-Collected Intelligence

Defense Science Board, Military

There are five bottom-lines on remote sensors, this report addresses four of them:

1.  Managing sensors together adds value that cannot be achieved from advances in technology.

2.  Meta-tagging the data at source (something we recommended in 1988) enables a huge jump in both sensor processing and inter-sensor sense-making.

3.  All satellites are vulnerable to laser attacks generally, Chinese attacks specifically.

4.  Close-in matters more as hard targets get harder, deepeer, and more nuanced.

The report does not appear to address the complete lack of “full spectrum” processing.  We excel at “one of” multi-media integration efforts, we still cannot integrate all information in all mediums all the time, and especially not in near-real-time.

Sensor Data Integration
Sensor Data Integration

2008 Information Sharing Challenges on a Multinational Scale

Government
Conference Summary
Conference Summary

“We do nothing by ourselves,” stated Information Sharing Executive Debra Filippi, of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks & Information Integration, or OASD/NII. She referred to the many-faceted dimensions of information sharing across multiple agencies, partners, coalitions, and international organizations. Multinational operations are the norm today in combat, stability operations, or crisis intervention.

. . . . . . .

Stability Operations Require Information Sharing

Aligning with the conference theme, Bill Barlow, deputy director of the Integrated Information Communications Technology office within the OASD/NII, emphasized that sharing unclassified information is essential to the success of stability and humanitarian operations.

He also said that unclassified information sharing and collaboration with non-DoD entities continues to be problematic. The DoD culture is “classify by default” rather than “share by default.” Over-classification of documents, cumbersome policies, and ad hoc networks have led to distrust by non-government organizations (NGOs) and numerous civilian agencies.

DoD leadership is now working to strengthen military support for stability and humanitarian operations by working with all entities, public and private, that contribute to mission success. All these initiatives are in line with DoD Directive 3000.05, which mandates that “stability operations are a core U.S. military mission that the Department of Defense shall be prepared to conduct and support. They shall be given priority comparable to combat operations.” The directive also states that information shall be shared among DoD, U.S. government, foreign governments, NGOs, and the private sector to “secure a lasting peace and facilitate the timely withdrawal of U.S. and foreign forces.”

2008 AFCEA Conference on Information-Sharing

Government, Methods & Process, Military, Technologies
Resource Page
Resource Page

Tip of the hat to AFCEA for its 2008 Information Sharing Conference.  They have provided one of the most remarkable resource pages we've seen, with audio as well as slides.  Although focused primarily on the technical side of sharing, the event touched on content and culture.

A few of the many presentations that caught our attention:

Ambassador Thomas E. McNamara
Program Manager Information Sharing Environment
Office of the Director of National Intelligence

Track 4: Cultural and Policy Implications of Information Sharing

Panelist: Mr. Al Johnson, Director of Integrated Information and Communications Technology Support (IIS), OASD/NII | PRES


Panelist: Mr. Steve Pitcher, Joint Staff | PRES

Del Spurlock Jr.: Our Obligations to Wounded Warriors

07 Health, Ethics, Military
Del Spurlock Jr.
Del Spurlock Jr.

Our failure to plan for the return of our soldiers wounded in our Global War on Terrorism has made it necessary to examine our unprepared and overwhelmed military/veterans health care system. Much is at stake. We are engaged in de facto perpetual war that depends on volunteers for victory. On July 31, after five months of analysis and deliberation, the President's Commission on Care for America's Returning Wounded Warriors will present its recommendations.  Co-Chairs Senator Bob Dole and former Secretary of Health Donna Shalala, both experienced and deeply committed to the task, will propose changes. The most significant effects of their recommendations upon the Nation and our maimed, cognitively impaired and traumatized service members and their families will accrue over a generation or more.

On that not yet foreseeable day when oil flows out of Iraq and international oil interests trumpet the event, wounded veterans will be reminded anew of their enduring courage and self-sacrifice, a gift to the Nation that made it possible for the rest of us to avoid conscription.  Fraught with combat memories, flashbacks, and disabilities, that reminder could never be sweet, but it will not be bitter if they find themselves as welcome in rehabilitation as they were in recruitment.

When the Commission presents its recommendations, some 3,200 of our volunteer soldiers will have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, and about 900 will have died of “non-hostile” accidents, heat exhaustion and illness.  Officially, about 28,075 have already been wounded: unofficial but authoritative analysis nearly doubles that number. But the signature wound of this war is a type of traumatic brain injury (TBI) resulting from the blast forces of improvised explosive devices (IEDs).  Blast-TBI (bTBI) is invisible to the naked eye as is post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).  Military doctors tell us that the official count underestimates the number of our soldiers who will return to their families, communities and employers with TBI’s slowed thinking, deficits in attention and concentration, headaches, memory loss, sleep disturbance, and irritability and with PTSD’s flashbacks and crippling emotional conditions. The number of invisibly wounded soldiers now exceeds the number of visibly wounded. We must not feign blindness to the epidemic we have brought home from this war.

Continue reading “Del Spurlock Jr.: Our Obligations to Wounded Warriors”