Who’s Who in Peace Intelligence: Dr. Col Max Manwaring, US Army Strategic Studies Institute

Alpha M-P, Peace Intelligence
0Shares
Dr. Col Max Manwaring

Dr. Max G. Manwaring is a Professor of Military Strategy in the Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) of the U.S. Army War College (USAWC). He has held the General Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research at the USAWC, and is a retired U.S. Army colonel. He has served in various civilian and military positions, including the U.S. Southern Command, the Defense Intelligence Agency, Dickinson College, and Memphis University. Dr. Manwaring is the author and coauthor of several articles, chapters, and books dealing with Latin American security affairs, political-military affairs, and insurgency and counterinsurgency. His most recent book is Insurgency, Terrorism, and Crime: Shadows from the Past and Portent for the Future, University of Oklahoma Press, 2008. His most recent article is “Sovereignty under Siege: Gangs and Other Criminal Organizations in Central America and Mexico,” in Air & Space Power Journal (in Spanish), forthcoming. His most recent SSI monograph is A Contemporary Challenge to State Sovereignty: Gangs and Other Illicit Transnational Criminal Organizations in Central America, El Salvador, Mexico, Jamaica, and Brazil. Dr. Manwaring holds an M.A. and a Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Illinois, and is a graduate of the U.S. Army War College.

The Manwaring Trilogy

Review: The Search for Security–A U.S. Grand Strategy for the Twenty-First Century

Review: Environmental Security and Global Stability–Problems and Responses

Review: Uncomfortable Wars Revisited (International and Security Affairs Series) (Hardcover)

Other Interventions

2004 SHADOWS OF THINGS PAST AND IMAGES OF THE FUTURE: LESSONS FOR THE INSURGENCIES IN OUR MIDST

2003 Manwaring (US) War & Conflict: Six Generations

2002 Manwaring (US) Asymmetry, Conflict, and the Need to Achieve Both Vertical and Horizonal Integration

Graphic: Information Operations (IO) Eras

Other Publications

Journal: MILNET Selected Headlines

10 Security
0Shares

U.S. Mobilizes to Send Assistance to Haiti

Phi Beta Iota: US military has been slow but more attentive than in the past.  They still lack Peace Jumpers, rapid-response peace flights, and multinational intelligence and logistics coordination “in a box.”  Afterthought:  PSYOP facilities, personnel, budget, and air leaflet capabilities could all be beneficially transfered to the Army Civil Affairs Brigade–drop peace instead of propaganda…

China's Google dilemma: Soften on censorship or anger millions of Internet users

Phi Beta Iota: Google is slinking out of town under false pretenses. Baidu and related Chinese offerings are not only better than Google, including voice to text and text to voice better than Google per Jim Fallows of the Atlantic Monthly now resident in China, they have been less arrogant about respecting China's concerns.  Look for Baidu to expand into Africa, South America, and Central Asia.  The Google Wave has crested.

What Happens When They Change Targets? (Richard Forno in CounterPunch)

…given the erratic and schizophrenic security responses to terrorism involving aircraft since 9/11, what will be our national response when our adversaries shift their focus towards other non-aviation targets? Here, I refer to things closer to our homes and families, such as schools, movie theaters, and shopping malls.

Phi Beta Iota: The US “government” at the political and policy level still thinks it owns the big stick and has not figured out that legitimacy and morality are what keep 90% of the potential “threat” neutral so that the last 10% can be dealt with using repressive measures  Dr. Col Max Manwaring of the U.S. Army Strategic Studies Institute has it figured out, see his 21st Century Security Trilogy.

Lawmaker Challenges Gates' 80-Percent Solution Effort (Full Text Below the Fold)

Phi Beta Iota: Gates is right, this is a US Navy go-around, time to fire the CNO for two reasons: 1) insubordination; and 2) too ignorant or obstinant to create a 450 ship Navy within the existing gold-plated budget.  This is the same CNO that interpreted “Irregular Warfare” as a life-best for SSBN's and focused all money on creating new things to throw out of the five-foot wide tubes, instead of trolling for pirates the way CENTCOM J-2P suggested in 2005.

Continue reading “Journal: MILNET Selected Headlines”

SOUTHCOM Week in Review Ending 13 January 2010

Uncategorized
0Shares

NOTE:  This offering ends 9 Feb 10 unless we can find a volunteer to do once a week.

Hot Topics

AA: Latin America's Military Factor 01/12/10

BO: Bolivia banks on ‘Coca Colla,' fizzy coca-leaf drink 01/10/10

CL: Chilean Government to Sue for Human Rights Violation 01/08/10

CL: ‘Chile's Berlusconi' looks to the presidency 01/10/10

CO: Chiquita settles Colombia terrorism lawsuits 01/08/10

CO: Colombian Judicial Ruling “Controversial” 01/12/10

CU: Contractor Jailed in Cuba Was Aiding Religious Groups, US Says 01/12/10

CU: Cuba's `industry of robbery' 01/08/10

HT: Haiti at a glance 01/13/10

HT: Haiti Hit by Powerful Earthquake; Buildings Damaged 01/12/10

HT: Haiti Quake New Blow for Country Mired in Misery 01/13/10

NI: Nicaraguan election tribunal stands for now: Ortega 01/09/10

VE: Venezuela Devalues “Bolivar Fuerte” 01/13/10

Below the Fold: Instability, Special Operations, Security Forces, Foreign Affairs, Crime

Continue reading “SOUTHCOM Week in Review Ending 13 January 2010”

Search: OSINT Conference 2010

Searches
0Shares

After Jardines broke his word and stole Steele's conference, and then imploded,  DNI staff seems to have taken a strategic pause, along with delegating its ADDNI/OS responsibilities to the CIA/OSC director, which is contrary to the DNI Directive.   Right now OSC deals with a very small number of countries and has nothing to offer the 90 countries waiting for leadership, nor is it able to harness the eight tribes of intelligence in its own country much less others.

Rumor has it that Naquin is planning something, and that depending on who General Burgess picks to be the DIA DISL DIOSPO, there may or may not be a Multinational Engagement event planned adjacent to that.

Steele, who is officially unemployed and seeking righteous work, is focused on finishing his new book which will then be translated into Portuguese and Spanish.  The Collective Intelligence book is being translated right now.  Both will be distributed at a UNASUR conference that is in the very early planning stages and will be sponsored by a government at presidential direction, if it comes to pass.

Continue reading “Search: OSINT Conference 2010”

Journal: Endless Money for War, No Checks & Balances

04 Inter-State Conflict, 05 Civil War, 09 Terrorism, 10 Security, Military, Strategy
0Shares
Chuck Spinney

It is becoming increasingly clear that 1981 was a watershed year in the history of the American political economy. What checks and balances that remained broke down. Deregulation, for example, took off and the bomb of private debt exploded (recall the chart I circulated earlier). The trade deficit skyrocketed after 1981, and deindustrialization, which started in the late 1960s took off with a vengeance. The growth in real income stagnated and gap between the rich and poor began to expand rapidly.

The same collapse of political-eocnomic checks and balances occurred in what was already a poorly checked defense sector. During the first 30 years of the Cold War with the Soviet superpower, between 1950 and 1980, the defense budget never experienced more than three consecutive years of real growth (i.e., after removing the effects of inflation) before going into decline. During war and peace, the inflation adjusted budget oscillated around a relatively constant or slightly growing median value (if one believes the Pentagons estimates of inflation). That pattern changed radically with the ascent of Ronald Reagan to the presidency. The budget began to grow much more rapidly and the checking process weakened markedly during the 1980s and especially the mid 1990s, when the budget began increasing even though the superpower threat evaporated.

With the election of George Bush II in 2000, any remaining checks on budget growth came off (as can been seen in Slide 1 of my June 2002 statement to Congress, which can be downloaded here), and then, spurred on by the politics of fear which enveloped the US after 911, the checking process to ceased completely and the defense budgeting process spun out of control, as a part of it went to fight never ending guerrilla wars but most of it went to propping up a modernization program and force structure that is an outmoded legacy of the Cold War.

Now, if there is any truth to the attached AP report, Bush's insane madness has captured President Obama and he is power boosting the defense budget further, albeit with feeble promises of small declines in the future, which will no doubt be forgotten in the unfolding politics of the permanent war economy.

Chuck

AP Exclusive: Obama wants $33 billion more for war

By ANNE GEARAN and ANNE FLAHERTY

The Associated Press  January 12, 2010

The Obama administration plans to ask Congress for an additional $33 billion to fight unpopular wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, on top of a record request for $708 billion for the Defense Department next year, The Associated Press has learned.

Journal: MILNET Intelligence Headlines

Uncategorized
0Shares

Book Review & Link

Why Intelligence Keeps Failing (Herb Meyer)

There isn't a chance that these clowns will come up with the right answer, because they're the problem. Simply put, the reason our intelligence service keeps failing to connect the dots is because the officials in charge don't know how. And the blame lies squarely with President Obama — and alas, with President George W. Bush before him — for appointing managers rather than dot-connectors to run our intelligence service.

Our country has no shortage of world-class dot-connectors. They're in politics, in business, at think tanks, in the academic world, and at our leading research institutes. You catch glimpses of them in articles they write, speeches they give — and sometimes even as talking heads on television. Ask a dozen smart people to make lists of people they consider to be world-class dot-connectors, and you'll get a wide range of names, some of which will appear on more than one list. Now, do you really believe that any of these lists will include, say, counter-intelligence chief John Brennan, or CIA director Leon Panetta, or Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, or Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair? Are you kidding?

What Our Spies Can Learn From Toyota Luis Garicano and Richard A. Posner

Five and a half years after the report of the 9/11 Commission identified the cascade of intelligence failures that allowed the 9/11 attackers to achieve total surprise, the problems it highlighted persist: We learn of multiple, separate and unshared terrorist lists; of multiple agencies (State Department, CIA and the National Counterterrorism Center) unable to combine the tips they receive; of arbitrary rules, such as requiring proof of “reasonable suspicion,” rather than mere suspicion, to deny a visa to a foreigner; and of terrorists released from American custody to become leaders of al Qaeda abroad. There is the sense that nobody is in charge.

Continue reading “Journal: MILNET Intelligence Headlines”