Owl: One Big Lie Many Small Lies … Boston Narrative Continues to Unravel

07 Other Atrocities, 08 Proliferation, 09 Justice, 09 Terrorism, 10 Security, 11 Society, Collective Intelligence, Corruption, Government, Idiocy, Ineptitude, IO Deeds of War, Law Enforcement
Who?  Who?
Who? Who?

In light of this blog post, it is evident the official versions of this event is losing more and more and more credibility. If they are lying about how the older brother died, what else are they lying about?

This blogger poses some pointed questions that imply the police account of the death of the oldest Boston marathon bomber is a fraudulent one. While this blogger makes no effort to offer a conspiracy theory positioned from a larger context, other than indicate the cops may be merely covering up their trigger-happy engagement with the suspect, his observation and other questions, at the very end of the post, provides further material for those of us concerned about a wider false-flag conspiracy committed by the US federal government.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev DOA
Tamerlan Tsarnaev DOA

If he died from the cop's trigger-happy shooting, why does the autopsy picture of the suspect not show him riddled Swiss cheese-like with many more bullets than is evident in the photo? It seems only a limited number of bullets (or “multiple”, as the MD says below), plus bomb blast shrapnel, killed him. The MD below also said his body was not disintegrated, which one would expect of a human body hit by a barrage of bullets coming from many guns. Unfortunately, the blogger says nothing about this. The autopsy picture is reproduced above.

“In a statement made before the Boston cops issued their revised account, one doctor who worked on Tamerlan was very clear about the cause of death: Police took Tamerlan ­Tsarnaev to Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center about 1:10 a.m. Friday. He was pronounced dead at 1:35 a.m. Dr. Richard Wolfe said the suspect had been hit by shrapnel from an explosion and that he had died from “a combination of blasts” and “multiple gunshot wounds.” But after the cops issued their “Dzhokhar did it” yarn, the medical witnesses suddenly became frustratingly vague: Dr. David Schoenfeld said 26-year-old Tamerlan Tsarnaev was unconscious and had so many penetrating wounds when he arrived at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center early Friday that it isn't clear which ones killed him, and a medical examiner will have to determine the cause of death.

The second bombing suspect, 19-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, was in serious condition at the same hospital after his capture Friday night. The FBI has not allowed hospital officials to say any more about his wounds or condition. Why not? “From head to toe, every region of his body had injuries,” he said. “His legs and arms were intact – he wasn't blown into a million pieces” – but he lost a pulse and was in cardiac arrest, meaning his heart and circulation had stopped, so CPR, or cardio-pulmonary resuscitation, was started. Schoenfeld did not address police's assertion that Tsarnaev was run over by a car driven by his brother as he fled the gunfire. Way I see it, even one bullet wound in Tamerlan's body damages the new “Dzhokhar did it” story. Do Boston's police officials actually expect us to believe that Dr. Wolfe was wrong when he spoke of multiple bullet wounds? How could a doctor examining a body possibly be mistaken about so basic a fact? Recall that the initial reports held that Tamerlan had been captured alive — a story which stayed in place for at least an hour. Several news outlets even published a photo of a naked man (allegedly Tamerlan) in police custody; we were later told that this was another fellow entirely. The claim that Tamerlan was struck by bullets was made by journalists who spoke with police at the scene. Example: Tamerlan went down fighting, hit by police bullets. According to the police he was wearing a suicide vest. How could a cop know about the vest but not know about the guy being dragged down the street by an SUV? There is no photographic evidence to substantiate the tale that one brother ran over the other, even though police cars often have video cameras, as do civilian cell phones. Journalists were on the scene; NBC had video of the firefight. Under those circumstances, how is it possible that we could be learning of so dramatic a development only now?”

The blogger offers other questions: “Why was the MIT cop killed? If the brothers had no car, then how did they get to that location? Why does this report say that they stole the cop's cruiser and drove it to commit the 7-Eleven robbery — a robbery which cops now say was committed by someone else? If they stole a cop car, why did they later hijack an SUV?”

If the older brother was not run over by a car and not killed by a mob of crazed trigger-happy cops, and the bombers actually did travel to locations in a way the cops cannot coherently explain, then how did he really die and when and where? The fantastic picture of Hollywood action movie-style events which occurred that night as painted by the cops and media has become too incredible, quite precisely and literally, to be believed. Was the fantastical drama of that night offered by the “authorities” to a gullible, movie-saturated public to distract them from noticing signs of another scenario that actually took place but much more dramatically sinister in its goals and dire in larger implications for the US public than any real or imagined Hollywood style shoot-em-up?


Did Watertown's top cop tell a big, big lie?

Phi Beta Iota:  We have no direct knowledge.  However, based on past bureaucratic tendencies, we speculate that the FBI recruited the brothers after they were pointed out by the Russians (or the Israelis or both) and sent them all expenses paid to Chechnya and then back home to serve as bait for others.  It is very plausible that the brothers were sent in to be visible to videos and to drop packs as a “drop” with no knowledge of the bombs, the actual bombs being placed by Craft private military corporation contractors, two of which did not go off (and are thus available for honest forensics and almost certainly do not have the brothers' fingerprints on them)…..and on and on.  The truth will come out eventually.  Right now our best guess is that this was a false flag sponsored by rogue elements DHS and the FBI (i.e. not representing the 95% that are good citizens and dedicated public servants), with no involvement by the Department of Defense or the Services.  In their ignorance and their arrogance these rogue elements overlooked the fact that this event would be under constant PUBLIC digital surveillance.  As of this moment, not a single element of the government narrative has been substantiated by forensic evidence, actual victims, or independent third party validation.  All “written” confessions from the surviving suspect (if he is actually still alive) are suspect as well, and very likely being fabricated by graphologists working frantically against the clock.

See Also:

Boston Bombing Unaswered Questions Remain

Jim Fetzer: Boston, Truth, Justice, & the Shift

Mini-Me: Boston Casualties Vanish Into Thin Air + Boston/Texas Meta-RECAP

Financial Liberty at Risk-728x90