Advancing Human Intelligence Integration for GEOINT and the IC
6-8 May 2013 Arlington Virginia
Download the Human Geography 2013 Brochure
Advancing Human Intelligence Integration for GEOINT and the IC
6-8 May 2013 Arlington Virginia
Download the Human Geography 2013 Brochure

Doctor Steven Greer has been on the front-lines of the UFO-Disclosure and Free-Energy Movement for over a decade. Greer is the founder of the vaunted Disclosure Project that interviewed/documented over 200 former military personnel about their experiences with UFOs, ETs, and Exotic Technologies under oath/signed affidavit.
Later this month Greer and his team will be releasing Sirius, a crowd-funded documentary that may very well eclipse the impact of Disclosure Project. Only time will tell.
UFO documentary reveals “humanoid of unknown classification” (OpenMinds, 3 April 2013)
Sirius Theatrical Trailer – Dr. Steven Greer, UFO's, Extraterrestrials, Alternative Energy (YouTube, 2:20)
Chatham House Report
Rob Bailey, April 2013
Report: Managing Famine Risk: Linking Early Warning to Early Action
Executive Summary: Managing Famine Risk: Linking Early Warning to Early Action

Project on Translating Early Warning of Food Crises into Early Action.
Chatham House report: Famine risks are badly managed
BBC News, 5 April 2013
Continue reading “Berto Jongman: Managing Famine Risk – Linking Early Warning to Early Action”

From Quantitative Easing (QE) to Moral Easing (ME)
a stimulus package to avert moral bankruptcy?
Introduction
Slide towards global moral bankruptcy?
Possibilities in the light of strategic precedents
Moral indulgences?
Moral easing or Qualitative easing?
Ensuring moral authority in practice
Moral indulgence in the current practice of moral authorities
Moral elevation
Pledging, promises and commitments
Declarations, Appeals and Calls for global action
Metaphoric confusion in diagnosis: constipation or diarrhoea?
Enabling moral currency circulation? (Annex)
References

This article The U.S. Government Is Suing Barrett Brown's Intelligence Research Site offers recent developments in the case of Barrett Brown, a journalist/activist whose web site “Project PM” runs a wiki that provides “a centralized, actionable data set regarding the intelligence contracting industry, the PR industry's interface with totalitarian regimes, the mushrooming infosec/”cybersecurity” industry, and other issues constituting threats to human rights, civic transparency, individual privacy, and the health of democratic institutions.”
“Last week…Barrett’s mother plead guilty to her charge of obstructing evidence: she hid his computers from the FBI. Late last night, the news broke through the “Free Barrett Brown” Twitter account that Brown’s Wiki, ProjectPM, which is described on the project’s Twitter page as being, “Dedicated to research of government corruption, sitting in bubble baths drinking wine,” was being subpoenaed by the Department of Justice. ProjectPM is an online compendium where Barrett and his fellow researchers share information they've been gathering about the intelligence industry in the United States. The Department of Justice is suing the company’s hosting provider, CloudFlare. While ProjectPM appeared to have gone down on Wednesday, it seems the site is back up. This kind of spotty connection has been very common for the site over the past few months. Even Googling ProjectPM does not yield any results that point to the site.”
Check out ProjectPm and sites showing research on similar issues at these links:

Roger Ebert and “Democracy in the Dark”
My first impression of Roger Ebert, many years ago when he was doing the Siskel/Ebert weekly dustup, was that he was a smart guy whose intelligence was undermined by platform – the half hour run-through of the week’s films was always rushed, his written work was better. Little did I know how amazing and strong he would prove to be as an e-patient, after losing his mouth, jaw, and ability to speak and eat to surgical complications connected with thyroid cancer. You have to respect a guy who’ll keep trucking after that kind of trauma, and with those constraints. He didn’t surrender, and continued to be one of the most knowledgeable and forceful film critics.
For some years Ebert was part of the University of Colorado’s Conference on World Affairs in Boulder. I saw him do his Cinema Interruptus thing there in 2001, when he made an in depth review of “Fight Club.” It blew me away, seeing how much I’d missed about that film, and how deep he’d gone into it, finding quirky subliminal cues planted by Fincher.
Cinema Interruptus involved going through a film one shot at a time, described by Ebert in this blog entry:
This all began for me in about 1969, when I started teaching a film class in the University of Chicago’s Fine Arts program. I knew a Chicago film critic, teacher and booker named John West, who lived in a wondrous apartment filled with film prints, projectors, books, posters and stills. “You know how football coaches use a stop-action 16mm projector to study game films?” he asked me. “You can use that approach to study films. Just pause the film and think about what you see. You ought to try it with your film class.”
I did. The results were beyond my imagination. I wasn’t the teacher and my students weren’t the audience, we were all in this together. The ground rules: Anybody could call out “stop!” and discuss what we were looking at, or whatever had just occurred to them. A couple of years later, when I started doing shot-by-shots at the Conference on World Affairs at the University of Colorado at Boulder, the conference founder, Howard Higman, described this process as “democracy in the dark.” Later he gave it a name: Cinema Interruptus. Perhaps it sounds grueling, but in fact it can be exciting and almost hypnotic. At Boulder for more than 30 years, I made my way through a film for two hours every afternoon for a week, and the sessions had to be moved to an auditorium to accommodate attendance that approached a thousand.

Google Translation:
Uploaded on Mar 7, 2011
Forget the credit crunch, it is not compared with the problems ahead. This says top economist Jeremy Rifkin in an exclusive interview with EénVandaag.
http://www.eenvandaag.nl/binnenland/3 …
According to Rifkin, everything depends on the question, how we deal with energy?
We continue to cling to fossil fuel than is the survival of mankind is at stake.
We move towards a sustainable society where everyone self generates and exchanges we have a chance to survive.
He bases his ‘Third Industrial Revolution' on four pillars: (continued after the clip (27 min) and below the line)….
Continue reading “Jean Lievens: Jeremy Rifkin on Global Issues and the Future of Our Planet”