Penguin: Bruce Schneier on US Destabilizing Cyber-Space

Advanced Cyber/IO, Communities of Practice, Corruption, IO Impotency
Who, Me?

Stuxnet cyberattack by US a ‘destabilizing and dangerous' course of action, security expert Bruce Schneier says

Schneier calls Stuxnet ‘mistake' for US, argues world needs to tackle cyber-arms control

By

Network World, June 18, 2012

Revelations by The New York Times that President Barack Obama in his role as commander in chief ordered the Stuxnet cyberattack against Iran's uranium-enrichment facility two years ago in cahoots with Israel is generating controversy, with Washington in an uproar over national-security leaks. But the important question is whether this covert action of sabotage against Iran, the first known major cyberattack authorized by a U.S. president, is the right course for the country to take. Are secret cyberattacks helping the U.S. solve geopolitical problems or actually making things worse?

Bruce Schneier, noted security expert and author, whose most recent book is “Liars and Outliers,” argues the U.S. made a mistake with Stuxnet, and he discusses why it's important for the world to tackle cyber-arms control now in an interview with Network World senior editor Ellen Messmer.

SLIDESHOW: Worst data breaches of 2012 — so far

The question is going to be debated whether Stuxnet was a good tactic to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon by sabotaging its facility through a malware attack in a covert action that was ultimately discovered. In an interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News last night, former National Security Agency director, retired Gen. Michael Hayden, said he thought it amounted to “taunting Iran.” Based on the mix of military leadership, governmental leadership and ethical questions it raises, is Stuxnet a suitable approach?

Read full article.

ROBERT STEELE:  Bruce Schneier is wrong.  This is not something that can be micro-managed.  The UN is largely worthless, and so are most international organizatiions (with several being totally toxic).  The only solution to cyber-security is going with Open Source Everything.

THE OPEN SOURCE EVERYTHING MANIFESTO – Transparency, Truth, & Trust . . . the meme, the mind-set, and the method

Winslow Wheeler: Common Defense Quarterly Article on Drones

Corruption, Government, Idiocy, IO Deeds of War, IO Impotency, Military
Winslow Wheeler

The Summer 2012 issue of Common Defense Quarterly is running my article, “MQ-9 Reaper: Not the ‘Revolution in Warfare' You've Been Told.”  To sum it up, I conclude “The proclamation of drones, such as Reaper, to be the future of warfare, a revolutionary transformation, is an empty, data free proclamation. The MQ-9 neither saves money nor improves performance compared to analogous, even primitive, aircraft. Such equipment only has a future in a defense system that prefers to degrade combat performance while increasing cost.”

To see the article and its data and arguments, find the complete magazine at http://www.commondefensequarterly/CDQ13/CDQ13.pdf.  The article starts on page 27.

If you want to review still more data, references, and of my analysis, find a five part series I wrote for Time's Battleland blog at http://battleland.blogs.time.com/2012/03/02/5-revolutionary-or-routine/.

Marcus Aurelius: The Battle For The Military’s Future

Corruption, Government, IO Impotency, Military
Marcus Aurelius

Note the contradiction between the planned personnel cuts and the comments on the urgency of keeping the volunteer force intact and coherent.

The Battle For The Military's Future

Walter Pincus

The Washington Post, 13 June 2012

“The face of war, the face of how we do business, is changing.”

That’s retired Marine Corps Gen. James Cartwright, former vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, sharing how he sees the military’s future at a National Press Club session for reporters Tuesday. Cartwright, who was known for his forward thinking while on active duty, has apparently decided to share his ideas through a series of public appearances.

One area that he sees changing in the military is what he calls “the platforms” — by which he means tanks, troop carriers, ships, aircraft, heavy guns and even rifles. They are becoming less important in Cartwright’s view than the new electronics, sensors and other gadgetry.

He recalls being with then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates in Georgia reviewing an Army unit ready to deploy to Central Asia with new systems that included iPads and droids for individual soldiers. Cartwright said Gates asked one sergeant during a barracks walkthrough, “What do you think of all this stuff?”

The sergeant replied, “I’d sooner leave this barracks without my rifle as to leave without these things.”

The lesson for Cartwright was that the new electronics, which the military calls information technology (IT), will replace in importance the current platforms — in which the side with the most modern guns, tanks and aircraft often won. Platforms, however, take time to develop.

Read full article.

Continue reading “Marcus Aurelius: The Battle For The Military's Future”

DefDog: Intel Dorks Launch Forward Cyber-Centers

IO Impotency
DefDog

Best quote of the article:

“A bunch of intel dorks wrote this, not understanding how people interact or how things work,” a former intelligence officer said.

U.S. Regional Commanders Get New Cyber Muscle

ZACHARY FRYER-BIGGS

Defense News, 9 June 2012

Just as details of the covert American/Israeli collaboration in the delivery of the famed Stuxnet bug surface, the U.S. Defense Department has created a formal structure for cyber operations that places increased capability in the hands of geographic combatant commanders.

The structure, based on an outline drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff in January, creates new cyber-focused structures within each command that will organize the implementation of intelligence and cyber tools, both defensive and offensive. The transitional structure will be evaluated and potentially improved within the year.

Previously, combatant commanders had limited access to cyber tools, relying on reaching back to U.S. Cyber Command (CYBERCOM). The delay and lack of capability limited cyber operations.

The new structure looks to change that, allowing for tightly integrated cyber effects. In a memorandum marked “For Official Use Only,” dated May 1, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta authorized the plan designed as a “first step” toward standardized cyber operations, according to documents obtained by Defense News.

Under the new structure, joint cyber centers (JCCs) will have chief responsibility for forward cyber operations, and serve as a link between combatant commanders and CYBERCOM cyber support elements (CSEs) that will provide intelligence information and operational know-how.

The May 1 memorandum authorized the implementation of a transitional framework, and directed officials to act with haste.

“It is imperative that we move quickly and put the transitional framework in place as soon as possible,” Panetta wrote.

Read full article.

Marcus Aurelius: NSA Blocks www.publicintelligence.net

Idiocy, IO Impotency, Military
Marcus Aurelius

US Cyber Command (read:  NSA)  has, “for operational reasons,” blocked access to www.publicintelligence.net from DoD computers.  You get a pretty WEBSITE BLOCKED notice.

Block “category” is:  “USCC_WIKILEAKS_BLOCK”
Also contains following blurb:  “This is a DoD enterprise-level protection system intended to reduce risk to DoD users and protect DoD systems from intrusion.  It will block access to high-risk web sites and filter high-risk web content.
As far as I have seen, publicintelligence.net doesn't do any direct collection by cyber means.  I'm fairly sure that they act as an information aggregator and integrator, receiving and posting stuff independently submitted to them by third parties who may or may not have obtained it legally.
Insofar as I have seen, there is little if any of the WIKILEAKS traffic posted on publicintelligence.net.  I don't think I've ever actually seen classified material on that site.
At least this morning, cryptome.org, which is far edgier, was unblocked.
Phi Beta Iota:  This is as silly as the US Air Force telling its people that they will be punished if any of their family members read Wikileaks.  Micro-management–and especially uninformed micro-management, does not scale.
See Also:

NIGHTWATCH: 6 Latin American Countries Reject Rio Pact

01 Brazil, 07 Venezuela, 08 Wild Cards, Corruption, Government, IO Impotency

Organization of American States (OAS): For the record. At the end of the 42d General Assembly of OAS members in Bolivia, the foreign ministers of Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela and Nicaragua announced that their countries had decided to withdraw from the Inter-American of Reciprocal Assistance, better known as the Rio Pact.

In making the announcement, Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Patino said, “Our countries have made the decision to bury what deserves to be buried, to throw into the trash what is no longer useful.”

Article Three states, in pertinent part,”The High Contracting Parties agree that an armed attack by any State against an American State shall be considered as an attack against all the American States and, consequently, each one of the said Contracting Parties undertakes to assist in meeting the attack in the exercise of the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations”

Twenty-two American countries variously have ratified the Treaty since 1947, but Cuba withdrew after the revolution and Mexico withdrew in 2004.

Comment: This is primarily a symbolic snub because the Pact is a relic of the Cold War and no surprise because the US Secretary of State did not attend the meeting.

All four withdrawing states have leftist governments and are the members of Venezuelan President Chavez' initiative known as the Bolivarian Alliance for the People of our Americas (ALBA), which is supposed to be a counterweight to the OAS. They appear determined to assert their distance from the US.

Argentina invoked the Rio Pact when it fought the British in the Falklands, but no American state rallied. The US invoked the Pact after the 9/11 attacks in 2001 to enlist the aid of the other American states in the War on Terror. Only four Central American states agreed to participate actively.

NIGHTWATCH KGS Home

Phi Beta Iota:  The creation of CELAC — the alternative to the OAS that excludes Canada and the US, has not been covered by the mainstream media.   A sustainable revolution is occurring in the South; the US Government will be the last to understand this.

See Also:

DuckDuckGo on CELAC

CELAC at Phi Beta Iota

noble gold