2013 BGen James Cox, CA (Ret) On the Record on Open Source Information versus Open Source Intelligence versus Secret Intelligence

Advanced Cyber/IO, Knowledge
BGen James Cox, CA (Ret)
BGen James Cox, CA (Ret)
(Then) Deputy N-2, NATO

Phi Beta Iota:  BGen James Cox, CA, as Deputy N-2, was General William Clark, USA / SACEUR ‘s action flag for Open Source Intelligence (OSINT).  He arranged for Robert Steele to brief all flag officers and colonels in charge of military intelligence across all NATO and Partnership for Peace (Eastern European) countries, and he sponsored the triad of NATO OSINT documents that remain a standard in the field, albeit long over-due for being replaced with a new “rainbow series” that itemizes sources and methods within each of the eight tribes:  Academic/Gold, Civil Society/Brown, Commerce/Gray, Government/Red, Law Enforcement/NYPD Blue, Media/Orange, Military/Olive Green, and Non-Governmental/Non-Profit/UN Blue.  Our efforts to inform the Secretary General of the United Nations have failed so far.

On the Record:

I can say that even during what was done and the establishment of an ‘OSINT' cell in the SHAPE Int  staff, I never thought that anyone had it fully ‘right.' By that I mean, when the OSINT cell was  raised in SHAPE, all they did was collect open source information, mainly from print media like Jane's, the Economist Intelligence Unit and Stratfor, and feed it to the small analytical staff. There was no analyizing the open source information in its own right and producing ‘real' OSINT  from it.

The process, to my mind, simply stopped at “OSINFO” and never got to “OSINT.”

Even today, I think this is still a problem in most ‘modern' intelligence staffs. People think that simply collecting open source info – although now from a  wider range of sources – is OSINT, when I say it is not. It's like collecting satellite pictures and calling them IMINT … the job isn't done until they are analyzed and an assessment made.

BGen James Cox, CA (Then) UNOSOM II Chief of Staff in Mogadishu
BGen James Cox, CA
(Then) UNOSOM II Chief of Staff in Mogadishu

If I was king of the world, I would build an OSINT organization to rival existing national SIGINT organizations (CSEC in Canada, NSA in US) and HUMINT organizations (CSIS in Canada, CIA in US). This OSINT organization would be in a number of big buildings around the country, tapped into all the sources you have long written about (media, experts, academia … all tribes) AND they would produce magnificent ‘single source' OSINT products that could be added to SIGINT, HUMINT, IMINT etc. products at the national level.

Given the power and range of today's global communications, I suspect OSINT products would be more complete and powerful than any other single source product.

Phi Beta Iota:  And 96% of the time, any other all-source product, at a fraction of the cost in a fraction of time.

See Also:

Graphic: Tony Zinni on 4% “At Best”

Graphic: UN 6 OSINT Relevance to UN Ten High-Level Threats

2008 Open Source Intelligence (Strategic) 2.0

2011 Open Source Agency: Executive Access Point

Dolphin: Why Obama Picked Hagel — and the Rogue Elements in the Military (Including JCS)

Corruption, Ethics, Military
YARC YARC
YARC YARC

Wow.  Read this at two levels — first off, an intelligent awareness that the Pentagon is out of touch with reality.  But at a second level, “rogue elements” is why Admirals and Generals have been relieved, for planning false flag attacks, and why Obama has the FBI all over flag emails in the months leading up to the election.  With all the stuff coming out about the “dual” chain of Command that Dick Cheney still influences with the Bushes in the background, and the rogue CIA, this is really fascinating.

Rogue Elements within US Military: Defense Nominee Hagel had warned Obama

Steve Watson

GlobalResearch, 3 February 2013

According to an account that Hagel later gave, and is reported here for the first time, he told Obama: “We are at a time where there is a new world order.

“We don’t control it. You must question everything, every assumption, everything they” — the military and diplomats — “tell you. Any assumption 10 years old is out of date. You need to question our role. You need to question the military. You need to question what are we using the military for.”

The Post states that Hagel warned Obama about becoming “bogged down” in the ongoing war in Afghanistan, saying it would define Obama’s first term. Hagel reportedly later privately questioned the wisdom of sending additional troops to join the conflict.

At the time, Obama had announced a proposed deployment of over 50,000 troops to Afghanistan, based on recommendations from the Pentagon.

In response, Hagel is said to have noted “The president has not had commander-in-chief control of the Pentagon since Bush senior was president.”

Read full article.

Why Obama picked Hagel

Bob Woodward

Washington Post, January 27

In the first months of the Obama presidency in 2009, Chuck Hagel, who had just finished two terms as a U.S. senator, went to the White House to visit with the friend he had made during the four years they overlapped in the Senate.

So, President Obama asked, what do you think about foreign policy and defense issues?

Continue reading “Dolphin: Why Obama Picked Hagel — and the Rogue Elements in the Military (Including JCS)”

Worth a Look: Paul C. Hoffman and EarthSeals

Worth A Look
paul.jpg
Paul C. Hoffman

Welcome to Paul Hoffman's home page!

If you're here to order some earth stickers, EarthSeals, “stickers of the
whole earth from space, distributed by donation”, then click < EarthSeals >
to get some.

Click on Image to Enlarge
Click on Image to Enlarge

If you'd like more info about me, (who is this wild, intense, brilliant guy
with “big plans for this planet” and nine different business cards/income
streams??), then < About Paul > is more about me, my life story, (written
by me or about me), more pictures and contact information.

EarthSeals

DefDog: Full Transcript of Hagel Hearing

Corruption, Ethics, Government, Military
DefDog
DefDog

Very sad — reading remarks prepared by White House weenies, a good man in a strait-jacket.

Full transcript of Chuck Hagel hearing before Senate Armed Services Committee

MondoWeiss, February 2, 2013

I believe we can call the Senate Armed Services Committee's confirmation hearing of Chuck Hagel on Thursday historic: for the savage questioning by Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham and John McCain that many have compared to McCarthyite attacks, and for the exposure of the Israel lobby's influence in the discourse for all to see. Robert Naiman at Just Foreign Policy published this transcript of the hearing. I am sure that readers can make good use of it.

Read full transcript.

Continue reading “DefDog: Full Transcript of Hagel Hearing”

Yoda: Volunteerism in Russia

Civil Society, Cultural Intelligence, Government
Got Crowd? BE the Force!
Got Crowd? BE the Force!

Government bad, , volunteers good?

In Russia, volunteers step up

By and , Published: February 2

ITOMLYA, Russia – A country doctor, a tiny, dilapidated village hospital, an indifferent health bureaucracy — and now, coming to the rescue, volunteers from distant Moscow, bringing furniture, equipment, money and, maybe most important, good cheer.In the background, though, is the parliament — weighing a law to bring any volunteer activity under the purview of the state, on the theory that people who organize themselves to do good work are a threat to the state’s power.

Read full article.

Continue reading “Yoda: Volunteerism in Russia”

DefDog: Shields and Brooks Condemn Senators — and Hagel — for a New Low in Hearings — PLUS 3 Big Ideas White House & Hagel’s People Don’t “Get”…

Government, Ineptitude, Military
DefDog
DefDog

Senators irresponsible, Hagel unprepared and lacking any upfront vision to shape the encounter.

Shields and Brooks on Hagel's Rough Hearing, Movement on Immigration

EXTRACT

JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, speaking of secretary of defense, Chuck Hagel, who, David, the president wants to be the secretary of defense, hearing yesterday, confirmation hearing before the Senate, pretty rough going.

What did you take away from that?

DAVID BROOKS: Yes, I thought it was terrible. I thought he did a very poor job.

And we have interviewed him. We have — Mark and I have said nice things about him. I certainly have enjoyed the interviews I have had with him, but he really did a bad job. He projected weakness, which is not something you want in a secretary of defense. He could not even respond to freshman senators with any force or vigor.

He projected a guy who hadn't prepared. Some of these questions were obvious questions, about the surge, about some of the things he had said on Al-Jazeera. You have got to have an answer. It's like somebody who walks into a big moment of their life without having done their homework.

And so I still think he will be confirmed on more or less party-line votes. But if it was up to sort of a looking for a boost of — a sign of competence, this wasn't it.

JUDY WOODRUFF: How did you see it?

Continue reading “DefDog: Shields and Brooks Condemn Senators — and Hagel — for a New Low in Hearings — PLUS 3 Big Ideas White House & Hagel's People Don't “Get”…”

noble gold