Category: Corruption

The author of this article makes a good case for the claim that at least one of the bombs in the Boston marathon bombing was a tiny micro-nuke.

When reading the start of this article, keep in mind what appears to be an error in the placement of the picture links or confusion in the text. The two photo link mentioned at beginning of article are in reverse order, that is, the wording does not make sense unless the 2nd linked picture – of remains of the alleged backpack bomb – is what is referred to when the text states “How Does This”, which on the page is immediately followed by a link to picture of a fireball explosion, and followed by the text “produce this” with a link to remains of a small bomb device. The fireball could not produce the device, it's the other way around.

In any case, how could the remains, say batteries, as noted below, of the alleged bomb, whose remnants are shown in the picture, not have disintegrated with such a huge blast, as seen in the image?

The article skeptically points this out:

“Plastic doesn’t melt and man I’m getting me some of those batteries – because if they can come out of something like the shown blast – those are some MIRACULOUS batteries.”

The blast pattern of each explosion is very different:

“Recent evidence – glass outside building – shows fireball from building used as a ‘vent’. The two bottom windows are being blown out. The window fireball to the left showed the least resistance to the explosion. The window to the right of it is slightly late in showing up – so had a ‘more resistance to flow – further away from the force. Note the weak force of the fireball – glass barely made it a few feet from the window. No sign of the first explosions impact on people and objects. No massive gusts of wind as in first explosion (one commenter described it as if ‘the building exhaled’). Two entirely different types of ‘explosions’.   Source.

The text then concludes one of the explosions is of a very powerful but small nuclear device:

“Compare the blast waves of the two explosions – or more appropriately the lack of a blast impact in the second explosion – Seen also in this video – but does not show the first blast and being pumped as 2 similar explosions http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkT3rmZSZ-w . The second fireball explosion appears to be more of an incendiary device (gasoline, jet fuel – kerosene) exploded by a small charge – the kind of thing seen in movies and drills – Requires HUGE backpack, i.e., not easily transportable – just a 55 gallon drum is several hundred pounds and is kind of hard to not notice. The first explosion is of much higher caliber, duration and effects. Current Theory – R/O Testing of the Smallest Pure Fusion Bomb.”

Continue reading “Owl: Micro-Nuke in Boston, Someone Planting False Evidence? Staged Fireball, Most Injuries Staged? + Meta-RECAP”