Army says no to more tanks, but Congress insists
By | Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — Built to dominate the enemy in combat, the Army‘s hulking Abrams tank is proving equally hard to beat in a budget battle.
Lawmakers from both parties have devoted nearly half a billion dollars in taxpayer money over the past two years to build improved versions of the 70-ton Abrams.
But senior Army officials have said repeatedly, “No thanks.”
It's the inverse of the federal budget world these days, in which automatic spending cuts are leaving sought-after pet programs struggling or unpaid altogether. Republicans and Democrats for years have fought so bitterly that lawmaking in Washington ground to a near-halt.
Yet in the case of the Abrams tank, there's a bipartisan push to spend an extra $436 million on a weapon the experts explicitly say is not needed.
“If we had our choice, we would use that money in a different way,” Gen. Ray Odierno, the Army's chief of staff, told The Associated Press this past week.
Why are the tank dollars still flowing? Politics.
Future of Social via Fastcompany
1. It’s about changing the system, stupid.
2. Change is accelerating.
3. To solve our problems we need more problem solvers.
4. It starts with young people.
5. Scale through collaboration.
6. Technology is driving creative disruption.
7. Power is moving from the few to the many.
8. The silos are breaking down.
9. Here comes the social Intrapreneur.
10. When You pass the torch light many fires.
Yes there is a difference between “social entrepreneurship” and “Social Media Marketing” but they are complimentary tactics and philosophies.