I'm often stunned by the lack of questions that adults are prepared to ask.
When you see kids go on a field trip, the questions pour out of them. Never ending, interesting, deep… even risky.
And then the resistance kicks in and we apparently lose the ability.
Is the weather the only thing you can think to ask about? A great question is one you can ask yourself, one that disturbs your status quo and scares you a little bit.
The A part is easy. We're good at answers. Q, not so much.
Here is another example of the potential of the Occupy movement.
A major focus of Occupy is the need to radically reduce the toxic impact of corporations in our society and on our shared environment. Although corporations have a very valuable role to play, the form and actions of large multinationals and speculative financial institutions, in particular, have become increasingly toxic, and this needs urgent correction.
There are limits to what nations individually can do about this, given the way things are set up at the moment. However, there is great promise in both global action and community level action.
For global action, I find the Simultaneous Policy fascinating: http://www.simpol.org. This is a global network of activists working to design and promote economic and environmental policies that can then be pushed into law all over the world simultaneously. To the extent they are successful, business interests will have a harder time finding places to operate where they can profit at the expense of human and natural communities.
At the other end of the scale of activism – the local community – we find the Community Bill of Rights described below. It “can be used by Occupy cities to begin using lawmaking activities in cities and towns to build a new legal structure of rights that empowers community majorities over corporate minorities, rather than the other way around.”
As we gather energy to rework our economic and political systems so they are truly responsive to the needs of Life, the Simultaneous Policy and the Community Bill of Rights are two potentially very powerful tools we can use together to make a difference.
There is strong undercurrent of “get out of the banks now.” Here are a couple of messages floating around, together with the observation to Occupy seems intent on creating an Occupy credit union and global lending network.
Woody Guthrie wrote many songs that expressed many different ideas and perspectives. But I think this one is my favorite. And it expresses my philosophy better than I could ever express it myself. I don't know where he got these narratives from. I think some of them may have been divinely inspired.
His song “Ship In The Sky” perfectly expresses so many things that I almost don't know where to start. But lets start from complexity theory. The song expresses the fact that none of us can survive without everyone else. And I think it also expresses the idea that children are more than merely unperfected adults. Often they are born with more wisdom than we can ever hope to attain or explain. Perhaps this is what Jesus meant when he said, in Matthew 18:3, “Truly I say to you, Except you become as little children, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven.”
I think Woody Guthrie's song expresses all these complexities. How did he know that? I don't know! I suspect it was because he had extraordinary wisdom.
It's my personal belief that there are, in fact, saints. I also believe that most saints are imperfect. I even believe they are sometimes *profoundly* imperfect. If there's any difference between saints and the rest of humanity, I think it's primarily due to the depths of their insights and their ability to express them in ways that the rest of us can grasp. If that's the criteria, then Woody Guthrie gets my vote for consideration as a saint.
But if saints tend to go unrecognized, maybe that's the way of the universe. Or as John Lennon once put it (and I paraphrase): every now and then a man comes along with a profound message, but people tend to worship the person and completely forget the message.
So maybe that's why saints are so obcure. If they were flamboyant, they would be worshiped and their messages would be lost. And since humility is the only authentic response to the fact of God in the face of God, maybe true saints have to get down in the mud and lose their pride, but without losing their sense of dignity and compassion. Who knows where they come from or why they're here? Who knows where they go when they leave? But they touch our lives in profound ways. Maybe we should just appreciate that and try not to over analyze it.
The song “Let's Work Together,” is a very wise song. But I think this song contains even more wisdom. Profoundly so.
The loose-knit hacking movement “Anonymous” claimed Sunday through Twitter that it had stolen thousands of credit card numbers and other personal information belonging to the company’s clients. Anonymous members posted links to some of the information Sunday and more on Monday.
Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates has called out lawmakers for their inability to compromise and develop bipartisan strategies and policies to “address our very real and serious problems.”
During a speech in which he called Washington a town of “oversized egos and undersized backbones,” Gates said “zero-sum politics and ideological siege warfare are the new order of the day.”
In the winter of 2002, a close friend, a liberal staffer on capital hill, asked me if I thought the crazy fulminations of the neocons and the tough-guy rantings of an insecure President [1] could result in a war with Iraq? My answer was something like ‘read the Barbara Tuchman’s The Guns of August and you will get a good idea of how these pressures can take on a life of their own and create a self-fulfilling prophecy.'
President Obama — perhaps inadvertently — is playing the same game with regard to Iran by trying to neutralize his political opposition at home with a dangerous mutation of Bill Clinton's cynical triangulationstrategy. In this case, the goal of the triangulation strategy is to pull the rug out from under the Republican warmongers like Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich. If he can co-opt the domestic political pressures for war against Iran, Mr. Obama may well think he can better position himself for the upcoming presidential election. But in so doing, he would be running a real risk of starting yet another ill-conceived war, whether he wants to or not. (Patrick Seale explains one way the march to war could spin out of Obama's control at this link.) To make matters worse, Mr. Obama is a man who has demonstrated that he talks a good line but fails to deliver on his promises when under pressure — just ask the Arabs about his Cairo speech or progressives who believed his promises about health care reform and “change your can believe in.” Whether or not triangulating questions of war and peace is a question of Obama's free will is quite beside the point: a malleable man is playing with the most dangerous kind of fire.
My last post, Beating the War Drums in Versailles on the Potomac, described the buildup of domestic political pressures to launch an attack on Iran in the name of prempting Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons, notwithstanding the fact that there is no solid intelligence proving the Iranians have embarked on a program to acquire those weapons. This aim of this post is to alert interested readers to another analysis in the same vein, but analyzed from a different angle. In The Winners and Losers of US policy on Iran, an op-ed that appeared in Al Jazeera (English) on 23 December, Jasmine Ramsey provides a useful insight in to the warmongering pressures on a president prone to appeasing his opposition for domestic political reasons.
The new year is shaping up to be a very dangerous one, because appeasing an external aggressor, like Adolf Hitler, is not the only kind of appeasement strategy that leads to war.
———–
[1] Any president who feels it is necessary to brag about being “The Decider” is insecure by self-definition.
The same week Obama declared an end to the Iraq War, Congress brought the US closer to confrontation with Iran
Jasmine Ramsey, Al Jazeera, 23 Dec 2011
In the same week that President Obama declared an end to the Iraq War, Congress brought Americans closer to confrontation with Iran. The whimper with which America's presence in Iraq ended was also drowned out by Republican presidential hopefuls beating war drums. This is America nearly four years into Obama's leadership. The President may have begun his term by trying to pursue a different path with Iran, but his acquiescence to domestic lobbying has made the results of his policies indistinguishable from his predecessor. Ironically, his attempts to appease pro-Israel advocates have only invited more onerous demands while leaving would-be supporters disillusioned.