IVN Steele on Electoral Reform Part 5: Debates

Access
Robert David STEELE Vivas
Robert David STEELE Vivas

Steele on Electoral Reform – Part 5: Debates

Independent Voter Network, 16 March 2012

Each state shall sponsor at least one presidential debate for a total of 50 debates, each state determining the questions, format, and participants. Each state shall sponsor at least one cabinet-level debate among designated individuals, e.g. the Attorney General, Secretary of Homeland Defense, etcetera. National debates shall be based on national polls that are open-ended with respect to who voters wish to see and hear participate in such debates. Candidates must participate in all debates to be eligible for free and equal access to public media.

Continue reading “IVN Steele on Electoral Reform Part 5: Debates”

Worth a Look: PogoWasRight.org

Worth A Look
Click on Image to Enlarge

PogoWasRight.org is my attempt to increase awareness of privacy news and issues. The site is not affiliated with any Pogo or Walt Kelly enterprises or web site. If you are looking for the official Pogo web site, it is at PogoPossum.com. Please send them my love.

PogoWasRight.org was born in 2006 because I wanted to expand the privacy news and issues coverage that I had been providing Cotse.net and then for TheMissingAmendment.org.  I chose the name PogoWasRight because I am a fan of the cartoon character and think that his “We have met the enemy and he is us” applies equally well to privacy as it did to the environment.

This site does not accept any advertising or political sponsorship. If I promote or recommend a site, it’s because I believe that they are worth promoting and for no other reason. I am a long-time independent and am an equal opportunity sniper when it comes to political organizations.

When I am not working on this site or its companion sites, www.databreaches.net and phiprivacy.net, I am a licensed mental health professional who is also an active advocate for the disability community. I occasionally discuss those topics on my personal blog, the Chronicles of Dissent. I choose to remain pseudoanonymous on my privacy sites for a variety of reasons.

April 17 Tax Day Protest Events Nation-Wide

07 Other Atrocities, Corruption, Uncategorized

Tax Day Protests and Events 2012
The numbers are staggering: Over $1 trillion spent so far on the invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan since October 2001. The government says the Iraq War is over, but the Pentagon is paying thousands of contractors to continue the occupation. Nearly half of each tax dollar is going to the Pentagon and military contractors.
Get out on (or before) tax day — Tuesday, April 17 is the final day to file this year — to protest the obscene  military budget while millions in the world go hungry. See the action list below, but if there’s not an action in your area, order some flyers (list at the bottom) and head out to a busy corner to leaflet for an hour.
April 17 is also the  Global Day of Action on Military Spending. See other listings and resources on their website.

Search: treverton intelligence tribe policy

Searches

Greg Treverton was a brilliant conceptualizer of the competing influences on policymakers, and also a major voice in the original discussion of tribes in relation to intelligence focused on the intelligence production tribe and the political consumer tribe.

Graphic: Competing Influences on the Policymaker (Treverton)

This was a contributing foundation for Robert Steele's conceptualization–with Alvin Toffler while driving away from a lunch at DIA of the eight tribes of information-sharing and sense-making

Graphic: 1997 Toffler-Steele Building Blocks

The two concepts are distinct because the first focuses on competition and accepts information stovepipes and hoarding as a given, while the second shows the larger benefits to all from sharing information and making sense together.

Graphic: Information Commons & Eight Tribes

See Also:

Greg Treverton at Phi Beta Iota

Graphic: Meeting 21st Century Transnational Challenges – Building a Global Intelligence Paradigm

Graphic: Open Source Agency Clients & Commanders

Graphic: The UN and the Eight Tribes of Intelligence

Reference: Human Intelligence (HUMINT) – All Humans, All Minds, All the Time [Full Text Online for Google Translate]

NATO CIMIC: The Roles of India & Pakistan in Afghanistan’s Development & Natural Resources

NATO Civ-Mil Ctr
Click on Image to Enlarge
Click on Image to Enlarge

PDF (7 Pages):  20120316 NATO CIMIC Role_of_India_Pakistan_in_Afghanistan_Development

March 2012

This report addresses the roles of India and Pakistan on the economic development of Afghanistan based on the material provided in open sources.

The involvements of Pakistan and India in Afghanistan are often related to each other. Given that the research and materials concerning these two countries’ involvement in Afghanistan heavily overlapped, the Civil-Military Fusion Centre (CFC) determined to address these two topics in one consolidated report.  It may be useful to preface the specific discussion of Indian and Pakistani contributions with a discussion of these countries broader strategies towards Afghanistan. For instance, an article noted by South Asia scholar Christine Fair in Foreign Policy indicates India hopes to contribute to peace and stability in Afghanistan and the emergence of an Afghan government which is on friendly terms with India. Similarly, a report from the Jinnah Institute and the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) indicates that Pakistan wishes to have friendly relations with Afghanistan and to ensure that events in Afghanistan do not contribute to instability in Pakistan. Such factors and many others, as demonstrated in the following sections, have led these two countries to make significant contributions to reconstruction, development and natural resource exploitation in Afghanistan.

NATO CIMIC: The Role of China in Afghanistan’s Economic Development & Reconstruction

NATO Civ-Mil Ctr
Wakhan Corridor (AF) Touches China
Wakhan Corridor (AF) Touches China

PDF (8 Pages):  20120316 NATO CIMIC Role_of_China_in_Afghanistan_Economy_Development

March 2012

This report examines the contribution of the People’s Republic of China to reconstruction and development in Afghanistan, with a particular emphasis on mining and natural resource exploitation.

On 05 December 2011, at the Second International Bonn Conference on Afghanistan, China’s Minister of Foreign Affairs declared the following: “The Chinese people cherish friendly sentiments toward the Afghan people and sincerely hope that peace, stability, independence and development will come to Afghanistan at an early date. We will work with the international community and make our due contribution to the achievement of this goal.” Such comments reflect China’s engagement with Afghanistan’s development, which has, since March 2010, taken place in the scope of the China-Afghanistan comprehensive cooperative partnership agreement, according to Eurasia Review. The topic of Chinese involvement in Afghanistan is taken up in this report, which primarily focuses upon China’s contribution to development and natural resource exploitation in Afghanistan. This review of Chinese engagement is divided into the following sections: (i) aid and development financing, (ii) bilateral trade and (ii) investment in natural resources. It builds upon previous CFC work concerning this issue, including a May 2010 report on “Chinese Involvement in Afghan Development”.

Graphic: US Defense Outlays vs All Others

Corruption, Government, Military
Click on Image to Enlarge

Source

Tip of the Hat to Winslow Wheeler

Phi Beta Iota:  Across most if not all US Cabinet budget categories, it has been established by multiple independent audits that roughly 50% of every dollar in federal spending is fraud, waste, or abuse.  This is as true of agriculture-food and energy as it is of defense and homeland “security.”  Federal spending today mixes a complete lack of requirements analytics; industrial-era processes that are grossly ineffective; ideological and criminal misallocation of resources, and zero accountability.

See Also:

Winslow Wheeler, The Military Imbalance: How The U.S. Outspends The World, AOL Defense, 16 March 2012.