Before long, they had set up a makeshift triage center in the lobby of the ER and began to treat the incoming — sewing up victims’ wounds and sending those with more-serious injuries through to be admitted. “We were prepared for waves of victims,” Feins told TIME, still wearing his scrubs outside his apartment near the hospital. “In the end, we worked on six people. Four had small lacerations, and we sewed them up.” Two other patients who had been in close proximity to the explosions complained of abdominal pain — a warning sign to Feins, who had been trained during his residency that explosive shock waves can cause internal trauma even if no shrapnel is present.
Phi Beta Iota: We count exactly four apparently wounded in these photos. FOUR.
“In the end, we only saw a few minor injuries,” Feins says, “But I have a feeling that some patients were taken straight from the ambulances to the operating theater. I was told we had four, very busy operating theaters today.”
Tell others please — Rolling Stone, Mother Jones, The Nation — now is the time for the public to come together.
Update 1.4 There is a very good chance no one was actually injured and this was a “no real blood” false flag. Tell others. The second post below is the new master post with links to all other posts.
Update 1.3 to add focus on collapse of corrupt media, bloggers rule plus prediction: USA will lose freedom of speech and freedom of assembly next, town by town. Oathkeepers and bloggers are all that stand between American the Beautiful and practical tyranny.
In the compelling video below, direct manipuatlion of NBC footage is shown, and one of the alleged wounded is identified as a known double amputee being used as an actor to fake a new double amputation.
Phi Beta Iota: It is now known that bomb-sniffing dogs were all over the event and should have, would have, “alerted” on a couple of homemade bombs. The government stories being replayed by the media are simply not credible. There has been no grid plot, no showing of where every victim was, nor have the actual victims, their limbs, and the scrap metal produced. It is now highly likely that this was a staged event in two phases: explosions, prepared staged wounded, perhaps a few innocent by-standers also killed or wounded; and then a second stage, at an Israeli-controlled hospital, of fabricating the alleged treatment of actors as if it were real. All signs point to this being a totally controlled, totally manufactured event. The extraordinary number of amputees claimed, in contrast to the very limited number of those killed and wounded (none amputated) by past pressure cooker bombs, appears to result directly from one bright idea (use real amputees to fake new amputees) carried to excess. The below YouTube has not been validated — it merely provides addition grounds for public concern about the lack of a coherent credible narrative for the Boston event. As of today we have not found photographs of more than 10 alleged victims, and there are no photographs of victims at the hospital or interviews with victims after the fact.
False flags are an American tradition. They go way back. The Boston bombings appear the latest. More on that below.
Notable earlier false flags or incidents approximating them include:
In 1845, America lawlessly annexed Texas. It was Mexican territory. President James Polk deployed US troops. A future president led them. General Zachary Taylor paraded them along the disputed border.
In May 1846, Polk told cabinet officials that if Mexican forces retaliated, he'd ask Congress to declare war. He wanted it whether or not Mexico attacked. After an incident occurred, Polk told Congress:
“Mexico has passed the boundary of the US and shed American blood on American soil.” The Mexican War followed.
The author of this article makes a good case for the claim that at least one of the bombs in the Boston marathon bombing was a tiny micro-nuke.
When reading the start of this article, keep in mind what appears to be an error in the placement of the picture links or confusion in the text. The two photo link mentioned at beginning of article are in reverse order, that is, the wording does not make sense unless the 2nd linked picture – of remains of the alleged backpack bomb – is what is referred to when the text states “How Does This”, which on the page is immediately followed by a link to picture of a fireball explosion, and followed by the text “produce this” with a link to remains of a small bomb device. The fireball could not produce the device, it's the other way around.
In any case, how could the remains, say batteries, as noted below, of the alleged bomb, whose remnants are shown in the picture, not have disintegrated with such a huge blast, as seen in the image?
The article skeptically points this out:
“Plastic doesn’t melt and man I’m getting me some of those batteries – because if they can come out of something like the shown blast – those are some MIRACULOUS batteries.”
Click on Image to Enlarge
The blast pattern of each explosion is very different:
“Recent evidence – glass outside building – shows fireball from building used as a ‘vent’. The two bottom windows are being blown out. The window fireball to the left showed the least resistance to the explosion. The window to the right of it is slightly late in showing up – so had a ‘more resistance to flow – further away from the force. Note the weak force of the fireball – glass barely made it a few feet from the window. No sign of the first explosions impact on people and objects. No massive gusts of wind as in first explosion (one commenter described it as if ‘the building exhaled’). Two entirely different types of ‘explosions’. Source.
The text then concludes one of the explosions is of a very powerful but small nuclear device:
“Compare the blast waves of the two explosions – or more appropriately the lack of a blast impact in the second explosion – Seen also in this video – but does not show the first blast and being pumped as 2 similar explosions http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkT3rmZSZ-w . The second fireball explosion appears to be more of an incendiary device (gasoline, jet fuel – kerosene) exploded by a small charge – the kind of thing seen in movies and drills – Requires HUGE backpack, i.e., not easily transportable – just a 55 gallon drum is several hundred pounds and is kind of hard to not notice. The first explosion is of much higher caliber, duration and effects. Current Theory – R/O Testing of the Smallest Pure Fusion Bomb.”
It always amazes me (and many others I expect) that no-one asks the right questions in these affairs. I was asked by RT to give my “expert analysis” of the health risk from the fumes produced by the explosion. Although my research and expertise is currently in the area of radiation risk, I was trained as a physical chemist, worked in pharmacology and do know something of the subject of the health effects of chemical exposures. I'll say something about that later. But whilst I waited for my slot on the RT news, I found certain critical facts entirely missing.
. . . . . . . . .
If a tank of anhydrous ammonia exploded it would only release the pressure of the contained ammonia. There is not much energy in that. But one firefighter at the Texas site likened the explosion to that of an atom bomb, with hundreds of homes flattened. A brief trawl of the internet will show that this was an Ammonium Nitrate explosion. Any expert should know this. It is basic stuff. To labor the point: the severity of the explosion and its devastating effect was not due to the failure of a tank of liquid ammonia. It was due to the detonation of the product,
Click on Image to Enlarge
. . . . . . .
I believe the answer is that for ammonium nitrate to explode, it has to be detonated with a detonator or with some major explosion. And this raises the question, in the week of the Boston bombings, of some individual having placed such a detonator into the store of ammonium nitrate. And the establishment absolutely do not want to start that particular hare running.
. . . . . . . . .
Anyway, my question stands: why did we not hear about the explosive properties of ammonium nitrate? Why were we steered away to something that could not have been the cause? I will return to the issue of science and truth in the media in later articles where I will address the whole area of how Science is used to justify Policy rather than to influence it.
The Unspoken Crisis of Worldwide Nuclear Radiation
Michel Chossudovsky (Editor)
I-Book No. 3, January 25 2012
Global Research’s Online Interactive I-Book Reader brings together, in the form of chapters, a collection of Global Research feature articles and videos, including debate and analysis, on a broad theme or subject matter.
In this Interactive Online I-Book we bring to the attention of our readers an important collection of articles, reports and video material on the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe and its impacts (scroll down for the Table of Contents).
GlassKeys at 6:02 AM April 20, 2013 Perhaps this is a giant blinking neon sign that says “we longer trust corporate news”.You have all done such a bang up job: A) Exposing the lies that led us to the Gulf War B) Holding government officials' feet to the fire when torture becomes official policy. C) Ignoring the “Occupy” movement for months until it was impossible to do so, then failing to report why no bankers go to jail for defrauding the public. D) Totally failing to hold President Obama accountible for extending the Patriot Act, not closing Guantanamo, using signing statements when he promised not to. IE all campain promises he has broken . E) Ignoring massive abuses of civil liberties and wastes of money by the TSA and the DHS. F) Ignoring the politicians that back increasing H1B visas, whilst millions are still unemployed.I could go on, but you have to cover important news like Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga's new meat dress.
Noticed today as comment on Boston bombings: Social media spirals out of control