Here is an example of human lives and costs of those “judges” who have no more authority to judge a ham sandwich than their fellow man.
The banks and their ilk are engaged in domestic terrorism against the American people.
This is enabled by an out of control corrupt judicial system — with Maryland and its constant overturning of homeowner motions to show cause (show the deed) constantly overturned by judges bought and paid for by the banks.
“The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition.”
Judge Edith Jones, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Source
“This crisis of confidence in the judiciary is real and growing, Left unaddressed, the perception that justice is for sale will undermine the rule of law that the courts are supposed to uphold.”
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor (Retired). Source
I regularly participate in Huffington Post forums, and they have a very sophisticated system of moderation. There are certain words and phrases it won't let through. And I discovered a new one today: false flag.
When my first post was deleted (under the “notifications” tab, which is where moderation seems to be the strictest) I looked at it, because it was a short sentence.
It was clear that the offensive term could only be “false flag,” so I retyped only those two words, and sure enough, they were instantly deleted.
That only happens under the notifications tab. And when it happens, the very instant you hit the reply button it says, “This comment removed.” So apparently I can't used the term “false flag” anymore, at least when I'm under the notifications tab.
The recently-introduced Strengthening and Enhancing Cybersecurity by Using Research, Education, Information, and Technology Act (SECURE IT), HR 1468, includes a “technical amendment” that actually would be one of the most far-reaching substantive changes to the Freedom of Information Act’s (FOIA) exemptions since 1986.
Similar to a dangerous provision that was included in the version of the bill introduced in the Senate during the last Congress, Section 107 of SECURE IT creates a new exemption to the FOIA that gives the government the authority to withhold information shared with or to the cybersecurity centers created by the bill. The bill also includes troubling language that defines any information shared with the cybersecurity centers as “voluntarily shared information” that is exempt under the FOIA and preempts any State, tribal, or local law requiring disclosure of information or records, and — in case anyone was still confused about the bill's position on public disclosure — creates a new FOIA b(3) exemption for the information.
While the anti-right-to-know language in SECURE IT is particularly bad, the provision is notably similar to cybersecurity bills like CISPA that attempt to encourage companies to share information with the federal government by giving them broad assurances that nothing they share will ever be released to the public. This approach is bad public policy: it ignores that most of the truly sensitive information companies are likely to share is already exempt under the FOIA and does not include a mechanism to weigh the public interest in disclosure of the information. Some of the information that may be shared under the bill — and therefore exempt from disclosure — could be critical for the public to ensure its safety
If the federal government really needs expanded authority to withhold information under the FOIA in order to persuade companies to share cybersecurity information, the issue should be addressed by Committee's that have expertise on public access issues: the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and Senate Judiciary. Any amendment to the FOIA, especially an amendment of this scope, should begin with careful consideration and public hearings by those Committees. It should not be a dangerously broad provision tucked into a large bill and disguised as a “technical amendment.”
Update: The authorities now claim the Boston bombing suspects are Chechnyan Muslims. How odd! The US and Israel are allies of the Chechnyan Muslims in their fight against Russia. In fact, the US and Israel create and fund Chechyan “al-Qaeda” cells to conduct terror attacks against Russia.
So maybe these suspects are the usual al-CIA-duh patsies. And maybe Israeli “terror experts”were flown to the US to oversee the framing of the Muslim patsies.
Seeing pictures and news footage of Boston is rather weird (see last link below) – gives a strong feeling of what martial law may be looking like in the US. I've wondered if this is in part a kind of dry run and “practice” or training for the cops for something much bigger in the future.
Here's some remarkable stories I've collected, especially first one:
“Could it be happening again? Could a Saudi terror cell be behind another major U.S. attack? And could the Saudi government be trying to sink the investigation? After 9/11, the Saudi ambassador demanded the evacuation of dozens of Saudi nationals, including bin Laden kin, before the FBI could properly question them. He got his wish, even though 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis and others had ties to the plot.
Eerily similar high-level intervention is taking place in the Boston bombings case.”
Early this morning, IB Times and Russia Today had ‘confirmed’ with Boston Police that the Boston Marathon suspect still evading police was indeed Sunil Tripathi. Now, in a 180 move, the suspect has changed to Dzhokar A. Tsarnaev based on a new AP report. It seems the media cannot stick with a suspect, pinning the Russian native and follower of Islam as the new ‘confirmed suspect’ hours after claiming that Boston Police had detailed the missing Sunil Tripathi as the suspect to CBS news. It was originally reported early this morning by the International Business Times: “Boston police on Friday revealed the names of two suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing, one of whom is an Indian origin person, Sunil Tripathi, reported CBS-affiliated television station WFSB.”
What appear to be private contractors, wearing unmarked, matching uniforms and operating an unmarked SUV affixed with communication equipment near the finish line of the Boston Marathon shortly after the bomb blasts – can be seen beforehand, standing and waiting just meters away from where the first bomb was detonated. The contractor-types had moved away from the bomb's location before it detonated, and could be seen just across the street using communication equipment and waiting for similar dressed and equipped individuals to show up after the blasts.
. . . . . . . . ..
The checkered, frightening history (see: FBI's History of Handing “Terror Suspects” Live Explosives) of the FBI's involvement in fomenting false terror attacks, and even presiding over attacks that succeeded in maiming and killing innocent people, should call into question their presence or involvement at any public event, especially when seen associating with unidentified, semi-clandestine organizations that appear to be private contractors.
‘Investigative journalism has never been this effective!' Publico The Kissinger Cables are part of today's launch of the WikiLeaks Public Library of US Diplomacy (PlusD), which holds the world's largest searchable collection of United States confidential, or formerly confidential, diplomatic communications. As of its launch on April 8, 2013 it holds 2 million records comprising approximately 1 billion words. WikiLeaks' publisher Julian Assange stated: “The collection covers US involvements in, and diplomatic or intelligence reporting on, every country on Earth. It is the single most significant body of geopolitical material ever published.”
