Reflections on Inspectors General

All Reflections & Story Boards
0Shares
Robert David STEELE Vivas

Short URL:  http://tinyurl.com/Steele-IG

Executive Reading (Printable 10-Pages):
2013 Steele Reflections on Inspectors-General 1.7

Updated 6 October 2012 Version 1.7

When I was selected for an interview to be the Defense Intelligence Senior Leader (DISL) for Human Intelligence (HUMINT) at the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), it was General Ron Burgess, USA  and Ms. Tish Long that decided whether to accept panel recommendations or not.  [Today DIA is under new management — one can only hope that General Mike Flynn, USA, has it in him to clean house, restructure, and start being effective at providing decision support to policy, acquisition, and operations, leveraging what he can control: use MASINT as the bill-payer, and execute full-spectrum HUMINT in M4IS2 mode, while flushing the DI.  I continue to believe an Open Source Agency is needed, but NOT under intelligence auspices.]

I learn from every experience, and was inspired by Peter W. in particular, then Chief of Staff for DIA/DH, to the point that after my interview I went home, sat down, and wrote the following in one sitting (polishing it considerably over the weeks to follow).  I am including the pre-publication approval letters below because I understand there are still köyün delisi out there who think that just because I have been under non-official status these past 20 years, I have somehow forgotten my obligations.

Click on Image to Enlarge

Human Intelligence: All Humans, All Minds, All the Time (Strategic Studies Institute, 3 June 2010)

HUMINT DoD OK with two changes

HUMINT CIA OK

The single most important graphic in the above work is shown here to the side.

Today I want to focus on one of the fifteen HUMINT slices, the Inspector-General (IG).  Although some progress has been made in developing Inspectors General for every agency and department, and in creating networks of Inspectors General both across the federal government and internationally, I do not believe the fundamentals of the Inspectors General have evolved properly, and therefore consider most Inspectors General to be doing the wrong things righter (reactive micro audits) instead of the right things (proactive holistic meta-training and education — integrative program formation).

Click on Image to Enlarge

Executive Summary:

The role and responsibility of the Inspector General (IG) should be reframed, to encourage the critique of programs from an additional perspective.  For IGs in national security, in national competitiveness, and in national intelligence (including education and research) that perspective should hold up as a standard that the IG communicates well to policy makers, acquisition managers, and operational commanders; at the same time that the information provided is relevant to whole-of-government action, serving whole-of-nation interests, with inter-agency and inter-agency transparency allowing for error detection and correction.   Such a perspective is assumed to be the responsibility of those higher in a hierarchy, but that is a mistake.  It is a perspective that can be applied at all levels, and in fact can only be effective if it is applied at all levels.  IGs might be better at applying this perspective exactly because they are in the middle – able to connect operational knowledge with national interest.  Just as the General Accountability Office (GAO) changed from Accounting to Accountability, so also must Inspectors General now follow suit: my vision empowers IGs and those they support by enabling a holistic and integrity forcing function to operate across all boundaries….in addition to inspecting they are sensing, engaging, empowering, educating, and above all, ensuring that the public interest is addressed in a coherent holistic honest manner at every level (strategic, operational, tactical, and technical).  Beyond an order of magnitude increase in the IG's value within their individual relative domains, there is an opportunity at the grand strategic level.  The ultimate task of a 21st Century IG, in my personal view, is to work as a body whole across all boundaries, to assure the public that its government will always seek righteous ends, administer cost-effective ways, and live within our means, the public means.  St.

Click on Image to Enlarge

Table of Contents

  1. Historical Gravitas of the Inspector General
  2. Inspector Generals Today (Focus on the USA)
  3. Dr. Russell Ackoff’s Wisdom — Bright Light for Inspectors General
  4. Intelligence is Irelevant
  5. Communications is Broken Beyond Repair
  6. Irrelevant Noise
  7. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Does Not Manage
  8. Inspectors General as the Seed Crystal for Elevating Intelligence with Integrity
  9. What Is the Big Picture?
  10. Appreciating Waste in the USA Today – 50% of Every Tax Dollar
  11. What is Our Starting Point?  Intelligence with Integrity, Championed by Inspectors General
  12. “Strategic Decrepitude” — Hell's Front Door
  13. What Is To Be Done?

Continue reading “Reflections on Inspectors General”

DefDog: SecDef “Normal” is Two-Star Generals Approving Individual Patrols

Corruption, Idiocy, Ineptitude, Military
0Shares
DefDog

Amazing….just amazing.  Reality out-does bad fiction.

Whatever Pentagon Says, U.S. Patrols With Afghans Aren’t ‘Normal’ Yet

By Spencer AckermanEmail Author

WIRED, September 27, 2012

EXTRACT:

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told reporters on Thursday that “temporary adjustments” to low-level joint U.S.-Afghan patrols, enacted in the wake of widespread protests over an anti-Islam video, had mostly come to an end. “I can now report to you that most [U.S. and allied] units have now returned to their normal partnered operations at all level,” Panetta said.

The shift was intended, as Panetta said, to “protect our forces” — not just from anger at the video, but from a broader problem. Afghan forces have killed at least 52 of their American mentors this year. The NATO military command in Afghanistan isn’t totally sure why, and blames a mix of specific Afghan grievances and Taliban infiltration. So last week, the command decreed that the two-star generals at regional headquarters have to approve all joint U.S.-Afghan operations below the battalion level — which accounts for most of them.

Read full article.

 

Yoda: Social Science and Biology Share Contagion Meme

Economics/True Cost, Knowledge, P2P / Panarchy
0Shares
Got Crowd? BE the Force!

A NEW KIND OF SOCIAL SCIENCE FOR THE 21st CENTURY

A Conversation with Nicholas A. Christakis

EDGE, [8.21.12]

These three things—a biological hurricane, computational social science, and the rediscovery of experimentation—are going to change the social sciences in the 21st century. With that change will come, in my judgment, a variety of discoveries and opportunities that offer tremendous prospect for improving the human condition.

NICHOLAS A. CHRISTAKIS is a Physician and Social Scientist, Harvard University; Coauthor (with James Fowler) of Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives.

Phi Beta Iota:  The social sciences are the moral and intellectual runts of the academic litter, with public administration being the bottom feeders unable to even define a discipline or establish laudable norms.  Computers are stupid — governments and corporations have very deliberately avoided the necessary investments in true cost economics, whole systems analytic models, and multinational, multiagency, multidisciplinary, multidomain information-sharing and sense-making (M4IS2).  This is a very positive development, but it is highly unlikely that major progress will be made in the absence of an Open Source Agency (OSA) guiding a global “Open Source Everything” renaissance of thinking–of intelligence with integrity.

See Also:

Peer to Peer (P2P) at Phi Beta Iota

Social and Biological Networks

Worth a Look: Book Review Lists (Positive)

Berto Jongman: SARS-Like Virus Moves to Europe

02 Infectious Disease
0Shares
Berto Jongman

Five in Denmark contract SARS-linked virus

Five people have been isolated in a hospital in Denmark with symptoms of a new viral respiratory illness from the same family as the deadly SARS virus.

EXTRACTS:

Petersen said those admitted were a family of four where the father had been to Saudi Arabia, and an unrelated person who had been to Qatar. Two of those with symptoms were under the age of five.

. . . . . . . .

SARS swept out of China in 2003, killing more than 800 people worldwide.

Read full article.

Berto Jongman: Blue Book USAF Col (Ret) on UFO’s

Extraterrestial Intelligence
0Shares
Berto Jongman

UFOs Are Real, Should Be Studied, Says Ex-Project Blue Book Director Col. Robert Friend

Retired Col. Robert Friend, a former director of the Air Force's nearly 20-year UFO study, Project Blue Book, says that science should continue looking into the mystery of flying saucers.

Friend, assigned in 1958 to direct Blue Book, was charged with trying to determine if UFOs were a threat to national security and whether they could be of scientific interest.

“When I first took over the program, I wrote two staff studies, and in both instances, I recommended that [UFOs] be put into another agency which would give them full scientific investigations and analyses,” Friend told The Huffington Post over the weekend at a special lecture titled “Military UFOs: Secrets Revealed.”

The event, held at the Smithsonian-affiliated National Atomic Testing Museum in Las Vegas, featured Friend, seen below, three other retired military colonels and a former United Kingdom Ministry of Defense UFO investigator.

Read full article with embedded videos.

Continue reading “Berto Jongman: Blue Book USAF Col (Ret) on UFO's”

DefDog: IAEA Veteran’s Letter “No Iran Bomb” Being Ignored

05 Iran, 08 Proliferation, 08 Wild Cards, Corruption, Government, IO Deeds of War, Knowledge, Peace Intelligence, Politics
0Shares
DefDog

I know nothing about the science, but this seems credible–certainly worth considering.

World Renown Nuke Expert Nails Bibi to the Wall on Iran Bomb Threat

Jim W. Dean

EXTRACT (Letter Only, Editorial Hyperbole Detracts)

Dear Prime Minister Netanyahu:

Iran may be in your red zone, but can not score.

Sure, Iran could divert a few tons of 3.5% or a ton of 20% enriched uranium hexaflouride gas for enrichment to 90+%. But what then?

No one has ever made a nuclear weapon from gas. It must be converted to metal and fabricated into components which are then assembled with high explosives.

Iran lacks experience with and facilities for these processes which are very dangerous because of potential for a criticality accident or nuclear explosion. Iran would not jeopardize its important, fully safeguarded nuclear programs by an attempt to have a deliverable, one kiloton yield nuclear weapon ten to fifteen years later.

Continue reading “DefDog: IAEA Veteran's Letter “No Iran Bomb” Being Ignored”