Koko: De-Extinction of Extinct Species

Academia, Ethics
Koko
Koko

Diversity good.

What's De-extinction and Should Scientists be Dabbling in it?

De-extinction – reviving once extinct animals using technologies like cloning and genome sequencing – is sending scientist to either corners of the debate. Some are vehemently against it, saying its natural process, while others say we have an “obligation” to do it.

Stuart Pimm of Duke University argued in an opinion piece in National Geographic that these efforts would be a “colossal waste” if scientists don't know where to put revived species that had been driven off the planet because their habitats became unsafe.

“A resurrected Pyrenean ibex will need a safe home,” Pimm wrote. “Those of us who attempt to reintroduce zoo-bred species that have gone extinct in the wild have one question at the top of our list: Where do we put them? Hunters ate this wild goat to extinction. Reintroduce a resurrected ibex to the area where it belongs and it will become the most expensive cabrito ever eaten.”

de-extinctionMeanwhile Michael Archer, a paleontologist at the University of New South Wales who has championed de-extinction for years, stands firmly against this. “If we're talking about species we drove extinct, then I think we have an obligation to try to do this.” Some people say that scientists will be playing God if they go ahead with de-extinction. “I think we played God when we exterminated these animals.”

A public forum was held today at the National Geographic's Washington headquarters for the TEDxDeExtinction conference where speakers came to share their views on the matter.

De-extinction has been in the works for more than a decade, ever since Dolly the Sheep demonstrated in 1996 that mammals could be cloned from cells in a lab dish. Spanish and French scientists worked for years on an effort to bring the Pyrenean ibex back from extinction, according to the National Geographic, by cloning cells that had been preserved from the last known animal of the species. However, this did not succeed as she gave birth to a deformed kid who died 10 minutes after birth.

Read full article.

Dana Theus: Yahoo, Change, and Cultural Design

Cultural Intelligence
If you somehow missed it, a media frenzy erupted after Yahoo announced that it will bring telecommuters home to the office.

Much of the noise came from the working-mom contingent upset at Marissa Mayer, a new mother and CEO in charge of bringing Yahoo back to life. However, for leaders to learn the true lessons of this brouhaha, we have to look beneath the headlines.

While I don’t hold Mayer accountable for representing the interests of all working moms, it’s fair to hold her accountable for shaping Yahoo’s corporate culture, which is what the move is intended to do. Yahoo’s policy memo made an attempt to explain that ending telecommuting is balanced by other policies designed to give employees perks and streamline the organization.

However, the memo’s greatest irony — which explains perhaps better than any other reason this move might have been necessary — are the words blazing across the top of the leaked memo: “DO NOT FORWARD.”

Maybe the leak was the result of one or two disgruntled employees — The New York Times reported that the memo was aimed at 200 employees — but it still speaks to a culture in need of tightening up.

Yahoo has been tight-lipped about the memo, saying only that the policy isn’t an industry referendum on work-at-home policies. However, sifting through the media-explosion fallout, it’s clear that this is one of many moves by Mayer to bring a more focused corporate culture to Yahoo. That said, it seems pretty ham-fisted. Looking at the memo from the point of view of corporate-culture design, here are some insights that other companies might want to emulate — or not.

Three things Yahoo is doing right

Continue reading “Dana Theus: Yahoo, Change, and Cultural Design”

Call for Papers: Future of Multilateralism in Governance and Regulation of Communications

Advanced Cyber/IO

Opportunity to showcase your research on the Future of Multilateralism in the Governance and Regulation of Communications

Special issue call for papers from Info

Special call for papers on Multilaterism in the governance and regulation of communications

More about the special issue

The editor of info invites you to submit a paper to a forthcoming special issue on the topic of the future of multilateralism in the governance and regulation of communications. This special issue proposes a scholarly exploration of the topic.

Schedule and deadlines

Submission deadline: 16 June 2013
Tentative publication date: February 2014

More about the speical issue

The failure at the WCIT meeting in Dubai to reach consensus over updating the International Telecommunication regulations reveals more starkly than ever the growing fault lines in the international governance and regulation of communications. This special issue proposes a scholarly exploration of the topic.

  • Papers are therefore invited on the specific issues raised by WCIT but also on the wider theme of multilateral governance and regulation
  • This could include, for instance, articles on subjects such as the impact of trade negotiations and agreements (regional as well as global/WTO); the impact of the EU jurisdiction (not only within the EU itself, but also in the EEA countries and in countries at various stages of the accession)
  • Or it could encompass a variety of aspects with regard to the ITU (eg the continuing impact of ITU processes and institutions on management of the radio spectrum and satellite orbital characteristics).

Contact the editor Dr Colin Blackman for more information to discuss your proposed paper and abstract.

Click here to see the journal's submission guidelines and notes for authors

Paul Craig Roberts: When Truth is Suppressed Countries Die

03 Economy, 11 Society, Commerce, Corruption, Government
Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Craig Roberts

Over a decade during which the US economy was decimated by jobs offshoring, economists and other PR shills for offshoring corporations said that the US did not need the millions of lost manufacturing jobs and should be glad that the “dirty fingernail” jobs were gone.

America, we were told, was moving upscale. Our new role in the world economy was to innovate and develop the new products that the dirty fingernail economies would produce. The money was in the innovation, they said, not in the simple task of production.

As I consistently warned, the “high-wage service economy based on imagination and ingenuity” that Harvard professor and offshoring advocate Michael Porter promised us as our reward for giving up dirty fingernail jobs was a figment of Porter’s imagination.

Over the decade I repeated myself many times: “Innovation takes place where things are made. Innovation will move abroad with the manufacturing.”

This is not what corporations or their shills such as Porter wanted to hear. Corporations were boosting their profits by getting rid of their American employees and replacing them with lowly paid foreigners. Porter’s job was to reassure the sheeple so that no outcry would materialize against the greed that was hollowing out the US economy.

Now comes a study conducted by 20 MIT professors and their graduate students that concludes on the basis of the facts that “the loss of companies that can make things will end up in the loss of research than can invent them.”

Read full article.

John Maguire: Alternative Currencies Centered on Hours

03 Economy, 11 Society, YouTube

maguireWayne Walton explains a new complementary currency that is popping up around the US. Mountain Hours, Mile High Hours, and Island Hours are just a few examples of this voluntary co-operative currency, which allows for more transactions than were previously available connecting more unmet needs with unused resources.

Completely sustainable, shifts power of the monetary system from banks to people.  Voting is ineffective.  Opt out of the monetary system, create your own benevolent local monetary system.

YouTube (17:59).

Owl: Oregon Company Selling Drone Defense Technology to Public

09 Justice, Civil Society, Military
Who?  Who?
Who? Who?

John Robb has referred to drones as the automation of repression and control over a populace, and such technology requiring far fewer players and much less money to implement and manage than regular police and armed forces. UAVs  must be very appealing for the psychopathic policy elites of the 1%, but they forget that any repressive initiative is going to stimulate a counter-initiative, and, in this new story, we note a new counter-initiative to drones directed on behalf of, in this case, ordinary people, the intended targets of the psychopathic control freak elite:

Oregon Company to Sell Drone Defense Technology to Public

The company says it won't knock drones down, but will stop them from ‘completing their mission'

US News, March 15, 2013

Do you want to keep drones out of your backyard?

An Oregon company says that it has developed and will soon start selling technology that disables unmanned aircraft.

The company, called Domestic Drone Countermeasures, was founded in late February because some of its engineers see unmanned aerial vehicles—which are already being flown by law enforcement in some areas and could see wider commercial integration into American airspace by 2015—as unwanted eyes in the sky.

“I was personally concerned and I think there's a lot of other people worried about this,” says Timothy Faucett, a lead engineer on the project. “We've already had many inquiries, a lot of people saying ‘Hey, I don't want these drones looking at me.'”

Domestic Drones Countermeasures was formed as a spin-off company from Aplus Mobile, which sells rugged computer processors to defense contractors—though the company won't discuss its specific technology because it is still applying for several patents. Faucett says that work has helped inform its anti-drone technology.

The company will sell land-based boxes that are “non-offensive, non-combative and not destructive.” According to the company, “drones will not fall from the sky, but they will be unable to complete their missions.”

Though Faucett wouldn't discuss specifics, he says the boxes do not interfere with a drone's navigation system and that it doesn't involve “jamming of any kind.” He says their technology is “an adaptation of something that could be used for military application” with the “combat element replaced with a nondestructive element.”

Read full article.

 See Also:

Dolphin: Their Drones, Our Drones, and EMP Rays

 

Gordon Duff: Concerns Over Proliferation of Intrusive Drones

09 Justice, Military
Gordon Duff
Gordon Duff

Drone Nightmare, the Unseen Threat

Today the Middle East and much of Africa are subject to attacks by American drones. As horrific as the drone threat may be seen today or even feared for tomorrow, the truth if far worse than ever imagined.

Drones of unimagined capability are being readied for deployment with even more frightening technical advances on the drawing boards. The drones we are seeing today, even the advanced RQ 170 Lockheed Sentinel captured by Iran in 2011, are child’s play.

EXTRACT:

BEYOND TOP SECRET TECHNOLOGY

Hyperspectral sensors look at objects using a vast portion of the electromagnetic spectrum

During the late 1990s,  was developed using cameras that no longer required light sources or extensive cooling required by infrared imagery.

Originally tasked with detecting oil and minerals or for oceanographic research, unforeseen advances in technology have surpassed “hyperspectral” into the “hyperspatial” range.

A drone with an “after-next generation” HS/HS system can detect your breath, give you a blood alcohol count, tell you what your last meal was and count the change in your pocket.

From a commercial brochure for units being offered for use on police helicopters:

Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing can be used in a wide variety of applications related to the detection and identification of threats for the military forces.

The Hyper-Cam High Performance Surveillance Network is well suited to protect civil and military against Chemical Warfare Agents (CWAs) and Toxic Industrial Chemicals (TICs) releases.

Read full article.

Continue reading “Gordon Duff: Concerns Over Proliferation of Intrusive Drones”

noble gold