Berto Jongman: How to Hide From Surveillance

07 Health, 09 Justice, 11 Society
Berto Jongman
Berto Jongman

‘How to hide from surveillance'

BBC, 27 January 2014

Is Big Brother watching us? Every day, street cameras monitor our movements and phones give our location and other information about us away.

New York artist Adam Harvey is working with surveillance, fashion and privacy, with a view to using fashion to help keep our lives more private.

He demonstrates how make-up can prevent facial recognition systems from seeing us, how clothes can foil a heat sensor looking for body heat and how a smart holder for your phone can prevent it giving away information about you.

Includes Video. Visit original.

Phi Beta Iota: The extremely wealth who are also extremely well informed appear to be investing in clothing including scarves and hats, all with high content of special metals to block harmful electromagnetic radiation.

See Also:

General Search: wifi dangers

Jon Rappoport: Connecticutt, Yale, & Cover-Up of Legalized Toxic Psychiatric Drugs – $14 Billion Buys a Lot of Immunity for Bristol-Myers Squibb; Boehringer-Ingleheim; Rib-X; Purdue; Alexion; Achillion; Pfizer

03 Economy, 06 Family, 07 Health, 11 Society, Commerce, Corruption, Cultural Intelligence, Government
Jon Rappoport
Jon Rappoport

Exposed: Sandy Hook shooter’s biggest threat still lives

Adam Lanza, the purported Sandy Hook School shooter, is the subject of an ongoing investigation in Connecticut. No, it’s not a police probe, it’s about “mental health.”

The investigation is all about Lanza’s medical history, what diagnoses were made, who the doctors were, what psychiatric drugs they prescribed Lanza.

The Governor of Connecticut is ultimately in charge, in order to make recommendations about improving “mental health” in the state and preventing future violent tragedies.

But the inquiry has stalled. And stalled.

Continue reading “Jon Rappoport: Connecticutt, Yale, & Cover-Up of Legalized Toxic Psychiatric Drugs – $14 Billion Buys a Lot of Immunity for Bristol-Myers Squibb; Boehringer-Ingleheim; Rib-X; Purdue; Alexion; Achillion; Pfizer”

Jon Rappoport: Monsanto Dishonesty & Rat Tumors from GMO Food

01 Agriculture, 07 Health, 11 Society, Commerce, Corruption, Earth Intelligence
Jon Rappoport
Jon Rappoport

Truth about the Seralini rat-tumor-GMO study explodes

Remember a researcher named Gilles-Eric Seralini, his 2012 GMO study, and the controversy that swirled around it?

He fed rats GMOs, in the form of Monsanto’s Roundup Ready corn, and they developed tumors. Some died. The study was published in the journal, Food and Chemical Toxicology. Pictures of the rats were published.

A wave of biotech-industry criticism ensued. Pressure built. “Experts” said the study was grossly unscientific, its methods were unprofessional, and Seralini was biased against GMOs from the get-go. Monsanto didn’t like Seralini at all.

The journal which published the Seralini study caved in and retracted it.

Why? Not because Seralini did anything unethical, not because he plagiarized material, not because he was dishonest in any way, but because:

He used rats which (supposedly) had an inherent tendency to develop tumors (the Sprague-Dawley strain), and because he used too few rats (10). That’s it. Those were Seralini’s errors.

Well, guess what? Eight years prior to Seralini, Monsanto also did a rat-tumor-GMO study and published it in the very same journal. Monsanto’s study showed there were no tumor problems in the rats. But here’s the explosive kicker. Monsanto used the same strain of rats that Seralini did and same number of rats (10). And nobody complained about it.

Michael Hansen, senior scientist at Consumer’s Union, explains in an interview with Steve Curwood at loe.org:

Continue reading “Jon Rappoport: Monsanto Dishonesty & Rat Tumors from GMO Food”

M. Johanna Smith: Science of Water Being Undermined by USG and EPA — Poisoned Water is Government Policy

07 Health, 07 Other Atrocities, 12 Water

At the August 2012 Gordon Research Center Conference on DBPs of Chloraminated Drinking Water Systems multiple researchers presented material regarding the ulra carcinogenic DBPs of chloraminated water. In an extraordinary and draconian measure, EPA had one of their own researchers taken into federal remand.

Susan Richardson (1990's)
Susan Richardson (1990's)

Dr. Susan Richardson At the time the then EPA Risk Management Lab researcher (Athens GA)  was handcuffed and frogmarched out of the conference because a private email of hers had been leaked in part without her permission to a Tulsa newspaper. It was not lost on the rest of the conference what would happen to them if they publicly discussed the conference findings regarding chloramines. Over a year and a half later and upwards of 130 million people are uninformed of the serious health risks to them, their families, animals and wildlife nationwide.

Judy LaKind
Judy LaKind

Dr. Judy LaKind presented  material at the conference citing if a child swims once in a chloraminated public pool he/she will sustain lung damage.(“Pool Induced Asthma“). Think of infants swimming in a chloraminated pool – they must be at greater risk,  perhaps to  even  respiratory failure, and yet no one is discussing this publicly.

Hexavalent chromium affects over 189 utilities nationwide. It remains a serious issue which no one is discussing. Chloramines still leaches lead and no one is discussing this. In the near future a study will be released showing that 49 million Americans are at risk from radiation in their water due to leaks from nuclear power plants . Additionally many Americans have naturally generated radiation in their drinking water,  via mining and petroleum operations. Add to this fracking issues and you pretty much have the picture. Almost forgot the hundreds of refined chemicals that there are no test for their presence in water..That rounds it out. [Phi Beta Iota: to this we would add the drugs that are flushed into the sewage system and not filtered out completely when the water is “purified.”]

The American public blindly trusts the utilities. Flouride is a known poison and a toxic waste and yet it is continually added to our drinking water. It actually works to increase bioaccumulation of toxic heavy metals. Think what the combination of flouride and chloramines does: delivering toxic heavy metals and increasing  bioaccumulation of toxic heavy metals, and for good measure delivering the ultra carcinogenic iodic DBPs and/or NDMAs.

Here is  the kicker. Flouride makes people more docile. Who knows what is really in  water anyway. Everyone wonders why Americans are so  inactive.–could it be they are being sedated with flouride, or lithium? — who knows? You must be very careful how you write about water issues. The water  industry is extremely litigious.

We need to have  oversight truly advocating for public health in  drinking water issues and/or convert to  a transparent innovative water treatment technology. The same day Susan Richardson was taken into federal remand my business partner was as well. Do you think it is a coincidence that the man who invented the solution to the chloramines debacle was taken into federal remand the same day as Dr. Richardson?

Clearly we do have the paradigm shift. It may be we have to take the technology outside the USA. However my heart breaks for my fellow Americans who will wind up as my daughter did at MD Anderson or the Mayo Cliinic because this technology is suppressed.

At the moment our government is in shambles that few understand. Perhaps read this material and think it over. There has to be a strategy better than starting a water panic. However I am on the verge of that because I feel people have a fundamental right to information so important to their survival. I had the feeling you might help me think of someting ingenious. The solution to negativity is always creativity.

Kind regards,

Johanna Smith

The paradigm shift in water treatment is as follows:

Stephen E. Arnold: Been Raped? There’s a List for Sale with Your Name On It…

07 Health, 07 Other Atrocities, 11 Society, IO Impotency
Stephen E. Arnold
Stephen E. Arnold

Data Broker Offered Sensitive Lists for Sale

Now this is downright creepy. The Wall Street Journal’s tech site Digits notifies us that “Data Broker Removes Rape-Victims List After Journal Inquiry.” As the headline states, the list has now been removed, but yikes! Medbase200 offered this tragic roster for sale, along with ones listing victims of domestic violence, HIV/AIDS patients, and “peer pressure sufferers”, until an inquiry from the Wall Street Journal prompted them to remove them all. This looks like a very large hole in our HIPPA protections.

Writer Elizabeth Dwoskin reports:

Continue reading “Stephen E. Arnold: Been Raped? There's a List for Sale with Your Name On It…”

Owl: “Smart Grid” is NSA on Steroids, Expensive, Instrusive, & A Major Health Hazard

05 Energy, 07 Health, Commerce, Corruption, Government, Idiocy
Who?  Who?
Who? Who?

Worse than NSA, plus Hazardous to Health & Home (Causes House Fires)

This is one of the 2-3 most important and perhaps alarming articles (and well documented) I've referred to on this site in the last twelve months. An absolute must-read for anyone living in the US and all other western countries and owns a house or lives in a dwelling with smart meters. The dangers this technology poses to freedom and health cannot be overstated.

Excerpts:

Continue reading “Owl: “Smart Grid” is NSA on Steroids, Expensive, Instrusive, & A Major Health Hazard”

Andy Piascik: “OBAMACARE” and the Bogus Health Care Debate

07 Health

“OBAMACARE” AND THE BOGUS HEALTH CARE DEBATE

The biggest secret of politics in the United States is that a majority of the population is to the left of both major parties. This can be amply demonstrated by comparing public opinion on a host of issues to the policies pushed by corporate and political elites. Whether it’s US aggression overseas, raising taxes on corporations and the Super Rich, expanding social services or any number of other issues, there is a vast disconnect between the people and those who purport to represent them.

This perhaps more than anything explains the widespread lack of public interest in voting. Rather than a result of apathy or ignorance, as many elite pundits arrogantly assert, public withdrawal from the electoral process is actually an informed choice. Since  people often rightly view voting as a lose-lose proposition, voter turn-out in the United States is significantly lower than anywhere else in the industrialized world, plus millions who do vote do so with little enthusiasm.

Continue reading “Andy Piascik: “OBAMACARE” and the Bogus Health Care Debate”

noble gold