The truth at any cost lowers all other costs — curated by former US spy Robert David Steele.
Posted 31 August 2008 this actually dates back to 2004 coincident with the Democratic Convention. Paul Ray is introduced by Jim Garrison, and presents new information with respect to 87% of the US electorate believing Earth should be treated as a living system.
See Also:
Continue reading “YouTube: Dr. Paul Ray New Political Compass (Green)”
Provocatively entitled “The Fight for Reality” Russian Television (a very effective counterpart to Voice of America) is on the air in a very pro-Gaddafi series that accuses Western media of lying and hyping the situation with blatant mis-information.
In other news, one of Gaddafi's sons is saying that Libya financed the election of the “clown” that is now President and they want their money back.
Panarchy is “a useful way of thinking about cross-scale dynamics in complex adaptive systems.” Source
Panarchy, in modern terms, is both an emerging theory of local to global relations spanning all current disciplines (e.g. economics, political science, sociology), and a public intelligence concept that posits non-violent collective intelligence, with access to all true cost information, as the prevailing form of governance from local to global.
Panarchy is strongly associated with the concepts of agility at the individual respondent and collective intelligence (crowd or swarm) levels, the only means of achieving resilience that is inherently stabilizing.
Panarchy is the logicial end-state for Advanced Cyber/Information Operations, ultimately achieving transparency, truth, and trust by connecting dots to dots, dots to minds, and minds to minds, in a seamless sustainable manner.
Panarchy, to be effective, requires feedback loops with integrity (the absence of corruption, data pathologies, or information asymmetries).
Continue reading “Panarchy-Not Anarchy-Future of Global Governance”
Dr. Stephen Blank, one of America's top experts on Russia and the former satellites of the USSR, likens US Intelligence to a clipping service, a very bad one. He itemizes the recent failures of US Intelligence and observes that anyone in the audience he was addressing in NYC could have written a better threat estimate than that presented by the Director of National Intelligence recently to Congress. Includes video of his full answer to the question about US Intelligence.
Army college expert likens US intelligence to ‘clipping agency’
By Asia Society Mar 18, 2011 5:30PM UTC
asiancorrespondent.com
Continue reading “US Intelligence a Clipping Agency–A Bad One”
Intelligence Analysis: Behavioral and Social Scientific Foundations
National Research Council, 2011
Intelligence Analysis for Tomorrow: Advances from the Behavioral and Social Sciences
National Research Council, 2011
Phi Beta Iota: There is nothing in either of these that Jack Davis, Stephen Andriole, Andy Shepard, and a whole lot of others do not already know. Going through this stuff, one can only observe that it took them three years to get to the obvious, and that neither book addresses the fact that the US Intelligence Community remains focused on collection inputs, lacks integrity across the board, has no strategic analytic model or modern collection management plan that respects open sources in 183 languages, and relies for analytics on young people without substantive knowledge, US citizens with secret clearances two steps removed from reality, and a total ban on actually engaging with the 90-country minimum it takes to achieve M4IS2.
See Also:
