Chuck Spinney: Global Moral Downside of Privatizing US Military Support

03 Economy, 04 Inter-State Conflict, 07 Other Atrocities, 11 Society, Commerce, Corruption, Government, Military
0Shares
Chuck Spinney

In the late 1980s, under the leadership of Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney, the Pentagon began to privatise many of  the military's support services that had traditionally be done soldiers, sailors, and airmen — laundries, dining halls, security guards, cleaning latrines, some supply functions, etc.  It was argued at the time that this would save money and free up troops for combat duties, thus increasing the tooth-to-tail ratio of our military forces.  According to this logic, fact that we were fielding an army that could not feed itself or wash its own laundry was deemed to be a cost-effective contributor to combat power.  Of course, the only real result was to transfer another large part of the defense budget to the defense contractors and open up vast new opportunities for price gouging.

It is an undeniable fact that, despite a massive move to privatization of support functions by the Pentagon, the tooth-to-tail ratio continued to get worse during the 1990s and in the subsequent decade, the daily cost per unit of deployed combat power, be it troops marching in the mud, flying hours, ship steaming hours, or tank miles driven, etc continued to increase at a rate much faster than the overall defense budget increased.<

As a result, two relatively low-tempo, small wars (compared to Korea or Vietnam) — i.e., Iraq and Afghanistan — have now cost more than any war America has fought, save WWII (in inflation adjusted dollars).  Privatization  — the neoliberal panacea for all things according to the adherents of the Chicago School of economics — may have created bloated profits for the MICC, fomented the rise of private armies, like Blackwater, and increased the corruption that naturally takes place among war profiteers, but the result has been a disaster for our nation.<

The below article in Le Monde Diplomatique is a good, albeit disgusting, example of how the privatization of public enterprise works in the real world of America's permanent war economy.

Continue reading “Chuck Spinney: Global Moral Downside of Privatizing US Military Support”

Mini-Me: Pentagon Plan X versus Skywiper/Flame

Advanced Cyber/IO, IO Impotency
0Shares
Who? Mini-Me?

Huh?

Pentagon Plan X

The Pentagon is turning to the private sector, universities and even computer game companies as part of an ambitious effort to develop technologies to improve its cyberwarfare capabilities, launch effective attacks and withstand the likely retaliation.

The previously unreported effort, which its authors have dubbed Plan X, marks a new phase in the nation’s fledgling military operations in cyberspace, which have focused more on protecting the Defense Department’s own computer systems than on disrupting or destroying those of enemies.

Plan X is a project of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, a Pentagon agency that focuses on experimental efforts and has a key role in harnessing computing power to help the military wage war more effectively.

Read full story.

and in related news….

Skywiper/Flame Analytics

See Also:

Owl: Major Cyber-Virus Across Middle East – Probably Israeli

Worm: The First Digital World War

DefDog: Words That Might Get You Labeled a Terrorist

Government, Idiocy
0Shares
DefDog

Interesting reading…

Revealed: Hundreds of words to avoid using online if you don't want the government spying on you (and they include ‘pork', ‘cloud' and ‘Mexico')

Department of Homeland Security forced to release list following freedom of information request

Agency insists it only looks for evidence of genuine threats to the U.S. and not for signs of general dissent

Daniel Miller

Mail  Online, 26 May 2012

The Department of Homeland Security has been forced to release a list of keywords and phrases it uses to monitor social networking sites and online media for signs of terrorist or other threats against the U.S.

The intriguing the list includes obvious choices such as ‘attack', ‘Al Qaeda', ‘terrorism' and ‘dirty bomb' alongside dozens of seemingly innocent words like ‘pork', ‘cloud', ‘team' and ‘Mexico'.

Released under a freedom of information request, the information sheds new light on how government analysts are instructed to patrol the internet searching for domestic and external threats.

The words are included in the department's 2011 ‘Analyst's Desktop Binder‘ used by workers at their National Operations Center which instructs workers to identify ‘media reports that reflect adversely on DHS and response activities'.

Department chiefs were forced to release the manual following a House hearing over documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit which revealed how analysts monitor social networks and media organisations for comments that ‘reflect adversely' on the government.

However they insisted the practice was aimed not at policing the internet for disparaging remarks about the government and signs of general dissent, but to provide awareness of any potential threats.

Mini-Me: Horne and Fetzer on The Two NPIC Zapruder Film Events: Analysis and Implications

07 Other Atrocities, Corruption, Government
0Shares
Who? Mini-Me?

Huh?

The Two NPIC Zapruder Film Events: Analysis and Implications

by Douglas Horne (with Jim Fetzer)

The authenticity of the Zapruder film and of the other home movies purportedly taken of the assassination in Dealey Plaza has been hotly contested since I (Jim Fetzer) first organized and moderated the first Zapruder Film Symposium during the JFK Lancer Conference in 1996.  We have accumulated an enormous quantity of confirming evidence since that time, where those who want to know what actually happened are better off reading the compilation of witness reports from those who were present, which John P. Costella, Ph.D., has compiled, “What happened on Elm Street? The Eyewitnesses Speak”, than they are watching the extant version of the film.  Indeed, John, who earned his Ph.D. in electromagnetism and is an expert on the laws of optics and the physics of moving objects, has a brilliant visual introduction to the study of Zapruder film fakery, “JFK Assassination Film Hoax: A Simple Introduction”.

Some of the most stunning proof of alteration comes from one of the most prominent figures in the extant film, Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent who was assigned to protect Jackie Kennedy.  As the volley of shots that blew JFK’s brains out to the back rear is virtually complete, Hill rushed forward to protect Jackie.  As he has consistently maintained for nearly fifty years now, he climbed up on the limo, where she was reaching across the trunk to pick up a chunk of Jack’s skull and brains, pushed her back down into the seat, lay cross her and JFK’s body, peered into a massive, fist-sized hole in the back of his head, and gave his colleagues a “thumbs d0wn”, all before the limousine had reached the Triple Underpass.  Yet, in the Zapruder film and the complementary photograph shown here–which also has to have been fabricated–we only see him climbing on the back of the limo and reaching out toward Jackie before it zooms toward Parkland Hospital and passes beneath the underpass.  What Clint Hill has been reporting–in written reports as well as during spoken presentations–contradicts the extant version of the film.

Read full article with additional photographs.

See Also:

Continue reading “Mini-Me: Horne and Fetzer on The Two NPIC Zapruder Film Events: Analysis and Implications”

The Open Source Everything Manifesto: Chapter 1 Open Sesame Extract II

Manifesto Extracts
0Shares
Amazon Page

Chapter 1 Open Sesame Extract II

Panarchy is an ideal condition in which every individual would be connected to all relevant information and able to participate in every decision of interest to them, from local to global.  Panarchy thus represents direct democracy within a nonhierarchical, open-source context.  In the ideal state of panarchy, every citizen is fully actualized, deeply steeped in integrity and intelligence, and able to participate creatively in the constant social reproduction of their world.

. . . . . . . .

At its best, panachy provides for near-perfect resilience in the face of great complexity because it reduces the resistance between all human minds and reaction points to near zero.  What this means is every human mind is connected to every other human mind, and to all relevant information; that observations by human immediately reach all other humans (imagine super-Twitter); and that with tools for thinking, the relevant human intelligence can be aggregated and applied to any situation in near-real time.  This is not something corporations or governments can do today.

Open Source Everything and Panarchy are symbiotic–a state of being, a state of mind, a state of the Earth.

Book Page at Amazon   .   Book Page at Barnes & Noble   .   Book Page at McNallyRobinson   .   Book Page at North Atlantic Books (Publisher)   .   Book Page at Powell’s Books   .   Book Page at Random House   .   Book Page at Super Book Depot

Tom Atlee: Dialogue and Deliberation Resource Center

Advanced Cyber/IO, Civil Society, Collective Intelligence
0Shares
Tom Atlee

The Greatest Dialogue and Deliberation Resource Center

Dear friends,

Many of you already know about the National Coalition for Dialogue and Deliberation (NCDD).  But I'll bet most of you have not checked out NCDD's incredible (as in unbelievably gigantic and useful) online Resource Center.  It is my own first stop when I'm looking for a process or resource having anything to do with powerful conversations.  People often ask me for stories about community conversations, and I send them to the NCDD Resource Center.  There are materials there for beginners and experts, practitioners and activists, journalists and artists, mediators, anarchists, business consultants… you name it!  It is as democratic and useful as a library or a sidewalk – everybody is welcome.  It is totally free and always expanding.  Anyone interested in any aspect of making a difference with conversations can get familiar with it – and have fun exploring.  I think it is one of the most amazing “secrets” of the dialogue and deliberation movement.

I'll stop raving about it now to give you a few minutes to check it out.  Below is a writeup to get you started.  Have fun!

Coheartedly,
Tom

========

NCDD's Resource Center –
http://ncdd.org/rc

The National Coalition for Dialogue & Deliberation (NCDD) has been cataloguing resources about and for dialogue and deliberation since 2002.  At http://ncdd.org/rc, you can access more than 2,600 discussion guides, assessment tools, case studies, public engagement programs and organizations, articles, books, videos, and more.

Dialogue and deliberation are innovative processes that bring people together across divides to discuss, decide, and collaborate on today's toughest issues.  NCDD's Resource Center was designed to connect you with the information, guidance, theory, and examples you need to engage people effectively.

You can use the search field, categories and tags, or additional sidebar navigation options to hone in. We especially recommend you use the “I’m Looking For…” sidebar box that lets you cross-search categories and tags. Use the site map at http://ncdd.org/rc/contents to see a full list of all the categories and tags, or just look over the most recently added resources at http://ncdd.org/rc/resources.  Do you know of a great resource on dialogue, deliberation, or public engagement that should be added to NCDD's Resource Center?  Use the form at http://ncdd.org/rc/add to submit your favorites!
Continue reading “Tom Atlee: Dialogue and Deliberation Resource Center”

Patrick Meier: State of the Art in Digital Disease Detection & Mapping

Advanced Cyber/IO, Earth Intelligence, Knowledge
0Shares
Patrick Meier

State of the Art in Digital Disease Detection

Larry Brilliant's TED Talk back in 2006 played an important role in catalyzing my own personal interest in humanitarian technology. Larry spoke about the use of natural language processing and computational linguistics for the early detection and early response to epidemics. So it was with tremendous honor and deep gratitude that I delivered the first keynote presentation at Harvard University's Digital Disease Detection (DDD) conference earlier this year.

Larry Brilliant

The field of digital disease detection has remained way ahead of the curve since 2006 in terms of leveraging natural language processing, computational linguistics and now crowdsourcing for the purposes of early detection of critical events. I thus highly, highly recommend watching the videos of the DDD Ignite Talks and panel presentations, which are all available here. Topics include “Participatory Surveillance,” “Monitoring Rumors,” “Twitter and Disease Detection,” “Search Query Surveillance,” “Open Source Surveillance,” “Mobile Disease Detection,” etc. The presentation on BioCaster is also well worth watching. I blogged about BioCaster here over three years ago and the platform is as impressive as ever.

These public health experts are really operating at the cutting-edge and their insights are proving important to the broader humanitarian technology community. To be sure, the potential added value of cross-fertilization between fields is tremendous. Just take this example of a public health data mining platform (HealthMap) being used by Syrian activists to detect evidence of killings and human rights violations.