Test Accompanyment:
Legal Proof The Russians Really Did Not Hack Or Disrupt The U.S. Elections?
Continue reading “William Binney: The Russians Did Not Hack the DNC or Anything Else!”
9/11 Twin Towers Were Not Hit By Nor Destroyed By Two Airliners
19 July 2018
Mr. President,
The 9/11 Commission refused to take evidence from Pilots for 9/11 Truth, of which I am a member, with over 19,000 hours flight time, much of that flying covert missions for the CIA, and including 17 world speed records in a Lear Jet Model 24.
No Boeing 767 airlines hit either of the Twin Towers, as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors. All of the “evidence” to that effect, including video depictions, has been fabricated and can be forensically challenged.
It is now known that Rudy Gulliani and the leadership of NYC as well as the owners of WTC knew years before 9/11 that the buildings must be brought down before 2007 because the interior steel and exterior aluminum were both compromised and the buildings would be at risk of collapsing — the cost to dismantle them was estimated to be $2B, inclusive of asbestos remediation. Hence the choice was clear: spend $2B to take care of the problem; or fake a terrorist incident and in collaboration with a complicit insurance company, take $7B in a false claim. The FBI — or Mossad officers pretending to be FBI — appears to have played a major role in the intimidation of all the architects, engineers, and photographers who spent years investigating the vulnerability of the buildings to uncontrolled collapse. None of this was investigated by the 9/11 Commission.
9/11 Twin Towers Collapse and Vaporization Cannot Be Explained by Nano-Thermite Alone
18 July 2018
Dear Mr. President,
Nano-thermite (a finely-granulated version of thermite, an incendiary long used to weld railroad tracks and to disable artillery using thermite grenades) has been oversold by those who claim that it holds the key to understanding how the Twin Towers were taken down. This thesis, promulgated by the lame stream media as the predominant if not exclusive “9/11 truth movement” view, is very easy to disprove, thus further confirming that what you call the “fake news” media is totally complicit in maintaining an official narrative that is false.

Alert Reader says:
This was the technology being released and in current use in 1992 timeframe. What is now used is incredibly advanced and best described as remote induction (soft-style) no voices heard but attitudes shaped in mass population very slowly and subtly except for controlled experiments like the DNC demonstrations of college students who leaders are paid and the followers are targeted with mass (soft) remote induction. Remote soft induction is now the norm, but voice to skull is periodically tested and deployed to see how effective it capabilities can be in selected unstable or mentally ill targets.
Phone calls can be totally or partially simulated in the alleged speaker's true voice or single words changed to sound exactly the same as the speaker, all done by high speed quantum based A.I. logarithms. There is a lot more to all this now, depends on how much you want to know. This jives with the Comm 12 Briefing Report and the Finders docs referred to in the US News and World Report (USN controlled).
Two documents below the fold.
Monsanto may soon face “FLOOD” of lawsuits from cancer victims of Roundup herbicide
Monsanto, the maker of the world’s most popular weed killer Roundup, could soon be facing an unrelenting flood of lawsuits from people who got cancer from their product.
On Tuesday, a federal judge decided to allow three expert witnesses to give their testimony pertaining to Roundup’s carcinogenicity. U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria ruled that the three experts could testify, and he even went so far as to say that their opinions were not “junk science.” The judge will be residing over more than 400 of the lawsuits against Monsanto.
Continue reading “Mike Adams: Monsanto Facing 400 Lawsuits Over Cancer ++”