Richard Wright: Army Computing SNAFU

Corruption, IO Impotency, Military
Richard Wright

Somebody Should Go to Jail

The Distributed Common Ground System (DCGS) is a direct descendant of the failed U.S. Army Future Combat System Program (FCS) which was cancelled in 2009 after a cost of some $18 billion dollars. The goals of the FCS Program were always somewhat ambiguous, but included the concept of “Network Centric Warfare”; the principal military advocate of which was the late Admiral Arthur Cebrowski (U.S. Navy).  Since his death his total vision of Network Centric Warfare (NCW) has found no strong advocate, but one component of NCW has been adopted by both the U.S. Navy and the Air Force namely an information focused command and control system under the acronym of C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers (C4) Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance (ISR)).

(See Network-Centric Warfare  by Norman Friedman (Naval Institute Press 2009))

Since each of the U.S. Military Services operate in a vacuum, to my knowledge the U.S. Army never approached either the Navy or the Air Force to share their experiences with NCW before or after launching the FCS Program. The DCGS is of course the information management component of a C4ISR decision making system. From the sound of it the U.S. Army spent over $2 billion dollars on an information system that not only did not benefit from Navy or Air Force experiences with similar systems, but whose designer had no understanding the basic analytic needs of troops who were going to use the system. Indeed the various program managers apparently did not talk to each other let alone the analysts in the field that were going to use it. This is all the more inexcusable because ten years ago the necessary applications to retrieve multi-source data, organize it, and display it using GIS was already in use.  (I and many other analysts routinely used this combination for analysis and production.) To design a system today which cannot do this with ease is criminally incompetent.  This is what happens when the Military Services, in this case, the U.S. Army are devoid of institutional memory and operate in nearly complete isolation. This is an area where the near somnolent Joint Chiefs ought to act, but are clearly too wrapped up in enhancing their own parochial interests.

Phi Beta Iota:  The above remarks were inspired by DefDog: US Army Blows Intelligence Computing (Again)….  All signs point toward the complete collapse of the US Government, including the Department of Defense (DoD), as a legitimate capable entity in both international and domestic state and local eyes.  More and more we are seeing hybrid constellations that have come to the realization that they cannot trust the US Government, they cannot rely on the US Government for valid actionable information or intelligence (decision-support), and they need not fear the US Government as long as they are “not an expensive enough problem.”  We now look to selected Governors, chambers of commerce, universities, professional associations, and perhaps a few enlightened national governments to begin shaping the new world network.  Through its own arrogance and ignorance, the US Government has cut itself off from reality and is unable to adapt to the new paradigm where sharing rather than secrecy, integrity rather than ideology, and intelligence rather than force, are the new rules of the game.

DefDog: US Army Blows Intelligence Computing (Again)…

Commerce, Commercial Intelligence, Corruption, IO Impotency, Military
DefDog Recommends....

I suppose a lack of integrity makes it impossible to learn….

US Army's $2.7bn Intel-sharing computer still not up-to-speed at work

Afghanistan Sun

Saturday 9th July, 2011 (ANI)

The Distributed Common Ground System, the US Army's 2.7 billion dollars computing system that was designed to share intelligence with troops fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, has proved to be a bit of a dud because ‘it doesn't work' properly, analysts have said.

. . . .

However, analysts believe that the DCGS-A was unable to perform simple analytical tasks in the past, and complained that its search tool made finding the information difficult. They also said that the software that is used to map the information was not compatible with the search software.

. . . . .

They also detailed problems with the hardware, insisting that the system is vulnerable because it is prone to crashes and faces dangers of going off-line frequently.

Read full article….

Phi Beta Iota:  This is the norm for all acquisition now.  Apart from needing integrity in all matters, the information paradigm must change, as so many outlined from 1988 onwards.

See Also:

Continue reading “DefDog: US Army Blows Intelligence Computing (Again)…”

Geo-Engineering: Be Very Afraid — Atrocities Advance

07 Other Atrocities, Commercial Intelligence, Communities of Practice, Corruption, Earth Intelligence, IO Impotency, Key Players, Policies, Politics of Science & Science of Politics, Power Behind-the-Scenes/Special Interests, Real Time, Secrecy & Politics of Secrecy
John Vidal

Geo-engineering: green versus greed in the race to cool the planet

Critics fear that manipulating weather patterns could have a calamitous effect on poorer countries

The Observer,

Phi Beta Iota:  This really excellent article is highly recommended along with a look at the only book in English out just now, Geo-Engineering Climate Change: Environmental Necessity or Pandora's Box?The fragmentation of knowledge, the corruption of governments and industry, and the abuse of secrecy to conceal the real dimensions of earthquake and tsunami creating technologies–High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program or HAARP being one set–all suggest that precautionary science has been set aside, and catastrophic initiatives are being undertaken on a foundation of very inadequate understanding.  This is the kind of global challenge and response that should be within the purview of a Multinational, Multiagency, Multidisciplinary, Multidomain Information-Sharing and Sense-Making (M4IS2) Centre that can be relied upon to produce “The Virgin Truth.”

 

Safety Copy Below the Line

Continue reading “Geo-Engineering: Be Very Afraid — Atrocities Advance”

Michael Schrage: Google’s Massive Failure

Commerce, Commercial Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence, IO Impotency
Michael Schrage

What Google's Quiet Failure Says About Its Innovation Health

11:39 AM Friday July 8, 2011

EXTRACT

Rarely do the post-industrial stars align so well for an entrepreneurial enterprise hellbent on market revolution. Between the ongoing digitalization, consumerization, and personalization of health care delivery, Google was supremely well-positioned to have as big an innovative impact on medical informatics as it's had on mass media. Admittedly, Google Health's original conception and execution as a ‘personal health records' portal wasn't particularly sexy or exciting. But then, that's what many naysayers had said about search and maps. Google had the skills and resources to iterate its way greater impact. Everyone understood that organizing the world's health care information was a worthy business ambition squarely in Google's innovation sweet spot.

The market reality proved sour. Nothing much happened. Barely three years after the service launched, Google announced its demise. Health officially dies in January; all whimper, no bang. By virtually every metric that matters, it's been a stunning disappointment. The service may not have lost Google much money but, relative to opportunities and expectations, Google Health transformed nothing. No paradigms were nicked or even nudged. Genuinely talented people with top management support and technological brilliance don't even have the satisfaction of a successful failure. (Google Wave, for example, may have been a market failure but even its critics acknowledged its innovation chops.) One of the world's most innovative companies didn't just fail to innovate as a business, it dramatically underachieved even as a technical innovator in one of the world's biggest, most dynamic, and most important industries. What happened?

Read full article….

Phi Beta Iota:  Hugely important observations applicable to Microsoft, IBM, Oracle, etcetera.  They are all in the Industrial Era pattern of fringe innovation and doing the wrong things righter, confusing money with insight.  Stephen E. Arnold has been saying similar things in more depth (see his Google Trilogy) for years.  No large organization with deep human and capital resources appears ready to create the World Brain & Global Game.

See Also:

Stephen E. Arnold : The Landscape of Enterprise Search

DefDog: Petraeus at CIA Strike Two

Corruption, Cultural Intelligence, Government, IO Impotency
DefDog Recommends....

Strike One was posted by Marcus Aurelius, on Petraeus and torture as an option.  Here is Strike Two.

East-Asia-Intel.com, July 6, 2011

CIA Director-designate Gen. David Petraeus told Congress last week that he is going to focus heavily on cyber threats to U.S. security, a focus that will likely mean greater intelligence-gathering efforts against China, among the most aggressive at conducting cyber attacks.

“As one of the CIA's enduring missions, I will focus on CIA's efforts to collect intelligence on foreign cyber threats,” Petraeus said in written answers to questions to the Senate Intelligence Committee. He said he plans to make cyber security a top priority at CIA, which has been reoriented in recent years as a human-intelligence gathering spy service.

Phi Beta Iota:  There are three parts to achieving cyber-security.  Part I is to build robust open source systems that have no bugs.  The US Government refuses to be responsible about Part I.  Part II is to build robust cyber-detection and response capabilities.  This is not possible without Part I, but the US Government is spending $12 billion a year on this with Cyber-Command.  Part III, which Petraeus is now alleging he will take on, is to achieve human penetration as well as close-in technical penetration of foreign-based cyber-war farms.  CIA has never been competent in this area, and the chances of its being able to achieve anything, especially against China (while ignoring Israel, Japan, France, and Germany), is laughable.  Petraeus is a smart man with no clue.  His CIA courtiers will lie to him, he will pass on those lies to Congress, and the lunacy will continue.  All of this is bad for business–real business concerned with real production.

See Also:

2010: OPINION–America’s Cyber Scam

2011 Cyber-Command or IO 21 + IO Roots

2010: Human Intelligence (HUMINT) Trilogy Updated

Journal: Israel, False-Flags, Dual-Citizens, & Smiles

Review: Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy–The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul

Review: Friendly Spies–How America’s Allies Are Using Economic Espionage to Steal Our Secrets

Operation Mockingbird–Covert Action Against Americans

07 Other Atrocities, 11 Society, Corruption, Cultural Intelligence, Government, IO Deeds of War, IO Impotency
Who, Me?

Operation Mockingbird was a secret Central Intelligence Agency campaign to influence domestic and foreign media beginning in the 1950s.

The activities, extent and even the existence of the CIA project remain in dispute: the operation was first called Mockingbird in Deborah Davis' 1979 book, Katharine the Great: Katharine Graham and her Washington Post Empire. Davis' book, detailing how the media had been recruited and infiltrated by the CIA for propaganda purposes, was controversial and not always accurate.

More evidence of Mockingbird's existence emerged in the 2007 memoir American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate and Beyond, by convicted Watergate “plumber” E. Howard Hunt and The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America by Hugh Wilford (2008).

Learn More:

Informal Summary

Duck Duck Go

PrisonPlanet Summary

 

Chuck Spinney: An Aghan’s Angst Over Corruption

04 Inter-State Conflict, 05 Civil War, 07 Other Atrocities, 08 Wild Cards, 10 Security, 11 Society, Corruption, Cultural Intelligence, Government, IO Impotency, Military, Officers Call
Chuck Spinney

I received this email from an Afghan (Pashtun) friend, who now lives in Europe and has a doctors degree from Oxford

Chuck

I’m sending you this email for two reasons:

1. The account of what has happened is fairly accurate.

2. Because the author's type of belief beggars the imagination: Namely, that a “democracy” can be imposed over-night on a social system that evolved over 2000 years with its own highly developed, deeply ingrained social dynamics, by a bunch of self-interested crooks.

I love his prescription: “The crisis created by Karzai's Court underscores the necessity for a genuine Afghan led dialogue on democratic reform. Options must be explored to strengthen the independence and resilience of Afghanistan's democratic institutions.”

If this could not be done during the past ten years, with this bunch in power, what hope is there that it’ll be ever accomplished with Karzai & Co. still at the helm ?

On the other hand, it’s understandable that he peddles this type of nonsense, because otherwise he’d be out of a job.

Karzais Court

By Jed Ober, Foreign Policy.com, July 7, 2011

In January of this year, Afghan President Hamid Karzai yielded to domestic and international pressure and endorsed the seating of the new Afghan parliament against the recommendation of a Special Court he created to evaluate election fraud claims. Few would have predicted then that six months later Karzai's Court would bring the country to the brink of complete political collapse.

Read full article….

noble gold