Republicans & Democrats Both Screwing the Public

03 Economy, Corruption, Cultural Intelligence, Government, IO Impotency
Chuck Spinney Recommends...
My only complaint about the analytical and moral content of this speech is that Sanders is not tough enough on the Pentagon (really the MICC).
Chuck Spinney
La Ciotat, France
——————–

Published on Thursday, June 2, 2011 by CommonDreams.org

Sen. Sanders Calls Out GOP and Dems on Corporate Tax Rates, Breaks for Wealthiest

Statement and Senate Floor Remarks by Sen. Bernie Sanders

WASHINGTON – Congress and the White House are now focused on how we deal with our huge deficit — a crisis brought about over the last 10 years by two wars, tax breaks for the rich, the Wall Street bailout and a prescription drug program — all unpaid for. The deficit also increased as a result of the declining tax revenues during a current recession, caused by the greed and illegal behavior of Wall Street.

The debate over deficit reduction comes at an unusual moment in American economic history. While the middle class is in rapid decline and poverty is increasing, the wealthiest people in our country and largest corporations are doing phenomenally well. Over the last several decades almost all new income created in this country has gone to the top 1 percent, who now earn more income than the bottom 50 percent. Further, the United States now has the most unequal distribution of wealth of any major country with the top 400 individuals owning more wealth than the bottom 150 million.

Given the reality of record-breaking corporate profits and the growing gap between the very rich and everyone else, it should be a surprise to no one that every recently published poll suggests that the overwhelming majority of the American people want the deficit to be addressed through shared sacrifice. They do not believe that the deficit should be reduced solely on the backs of working families, the elderly, children, the sick and the poor — many of whom are already suffering as a result of the recession. Unfortunately, that is exactly what the Republicans have proposed.

Rest of article….

Phi Beta Iota: The hypocrisy of the Democratic Administration is exceeded only by the hypocrisy of the Republican Party–one bird, two wings, same shit, just different colors.   We await a knight speaking truth.

Bob Gates: Flat Out Liar or Just Feeble? + RECAP

04 Inter-State Conflict, 07 Other Atrocities, 10 Security, 11 Society, Budgets & Funding, Corruption, Government, IO Impotency, Military
Winslow Wheeler

For months I have been reading in the press about Robert Gates “cancelling more than 30 [defense hardware] programs.”  A May 24 Bloomberg article by Viole Gienger (“Gates Says Military Cuts May Protect F-35, Submarines”) came up quick on a Google search.  Other articles credit Gates with “saving more than $300 billion” with these – presumably tough – decisions.

In case you are wondering where this imagery of Secretary of Defense Robert Gates as a tough task master for out of control DOD procurement is coming, you need look no further than Robert Gates.

At a May 24 farewell speech to the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, Gates repeated his own claim, made frequently earlier, that “All told, over the past two years, more than 30 programs were cancelled, capped, or ended that, if pursued to completion, would have cost more than $300 billion.”  (See the speech at http//www.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=1570.)  A bit later he hammered home the point in case any of the press present missed the legacy Gates seeks for himself: “when it comes to our military modernization accounts, the proverbial ‘low hanging fruit' – those weapons and other programs considered most questionable – have not only been plucked, they have been stomped on and crushed.”

Robert Gates did not reduce the number of hardware programs in the Department of Defense; he increased them.  A term he has repeatedly expressed distaste for (“math”) proves him wrong.  DOD keeps periodic records on these sorts of things; DOD's Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) track the number of major hardware programs and their acquisition costs.  (Find them at http://www.acq.osd.mil/ara/am/sar/)

They show the following:

  • In September 2008, just before Barack Obama was elected and selected Robert Gates as his Secretary of Defense, there were 91 Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs).  They were projected to cost $1,648 billion dollars.

  • In April 2009, Gates announced the termination of various defense programs.  The SAR that next came out, in December 2009, showed the number of MDAPs had indeed declined: to 87 programs, costing a little less ($1,616 billion).

  • Nine months later, after Gates took some more whacks at the defense budget – if that's what you want to call them – the SAR that came out in September 2010 showed the number of MDAPs had increased to 94.  Their cost also increased – to $1,679 billion.

  • The most recent SAR, for December 2010, shows another increase, both in programs (to 95) and money (to $1,720 billion).

So, thanks to Secretary Gates “termination” of more than 30 programs “saving” us $300 billion, we now have an increase of four programs costing an additional $72 billion.

I have two questions:

1) Just what legacy should we be giving Mr. Gates?

2) What type of “math” will Leon Panetta use when he is made Secretary of Defense later this year?

See Also:

Continue reading “Bob Gates: Flat Out Liar or Just Feeble? + RECAP”

Bob Gates Spins Exit from Afghanistan

04 Inter-State Conflict, 05 Civil War, 07 Other Atrocities, 08 Wild Cards, 09 Justice, 10 Security, 11 Society, Budgets & Funding, Corruption, Cultural Intelligence, Government, IO Impotency, Military, Misinformation & Propaganda, Officers Call, Peace Intelligence
DefDog Recommends....

There are a number of points that don't ring true…….but before we look at these, one must identify who the “Taliban” Gates is talking about are….there is one Afghan Taliban (Mullah Omar), there is the Haqqani Network, there is the HIG (Hekmatyar), and now the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU)is active in Northern Afghanistan.  This is a loose confederation that will support one another when it is beneficial and bear arms against one another when necessary.  The issues are: (1) abandon ties to Al Qeada……it is known that there is no strong linkage between the two at this point in time.  The Taliban are not looking to exert control over any territory larger than current Afghanistan (and the Pashtun belt of Pakistan).  (2) I am not aware of any pressure being put on by Coalition Forces that will induce the Taliban to the Peace Table.  Statistics do not bear out any of the spin emanating from ISAF about the Taliban being ineffective.  They are somewhat stagnant, however, they are demonstrating the ability to infiltrate into the heart of the Afghan military/government.  They are very active in the areas Karzai has declared as secure enough to allow the nascent Afghan National Army to exercise control. The most interesting part: As wars conclude, Gates noted, it is inevitable that “peace is made between people who have been killing each other.”  The Taliban, he added, is “part of the fabric” of Afghan politics. This suggests that this administration will declare victory and go home, only to aid the electoral process…..

Gates Sees Taliban Engaged In Talks By Year's End

Continue reading “Bob Gates Spins Exit from Afghanistan”

Weak Signals: Glenn Beck Now Netanyahu’s Bitch, Israel Kicks Off “Final” Propaganda Campaign

IO Impotency

Background: One of the most powerful alliances in modern propaganda history was formed between Israeli militant Jews and the extreme right-wing evangelicals.  A joint project to develop the perfect “red calf” is just the tip of the iceberg.

Discussion: There are weak but clear signals that Israel is kicking off a “final” or “scorched earth” propaganda campaign with the common theme of labeling both the Arabs and the Chinese as “Nazis,” (and the Iranian's as “pivotal” creators of 9/11 attack), of cancelling Barack Obama's “contract” to be the lead actor at the White House, of making it clear to the Republican Presidential candidates that the nomination will be channeled via Israel, and–saddest of all–that Glenn Beck is now Netanyahu's bitch.  The sidebar is Iran, it's nuclear program, and the very high probability that the US Pentagon–regardless of what Barack Obama thinks or wants–will engage in an illegal offensive action against Iran, “over-ruling” Obama just as they did with the Bin Laden Show, but pointing out that in the face of the collapsing economy, starting a nuclear war over Iran is his last best shot at a second term.  We don't make this stuff up.  The good news is that Roger Ailes has fired Glenn Beck, and is thinking deeply about the lack of a Republican bench, strategy, or even coherent philosophy upon which to base a campaign for the Presidency.

Egyptian Nazi Party Formed (New American, 1 June 2011)

Neo-Nazi websites find home in US (jewish world, 1 June 2011)

The Persecution Of Jews In Iraq (neon tommy, 1 June 2011)

China is Going Nazi (Power and Control, 28 May 2011)

Beck: ‘Arab Spring' Spawns Nazis? (Fox News, 26 May 2011)

Defectors Claim Iranian Role in 9/11 Attacks (IPT News, 20 May 2011)

Court Filings Assert Iran Had Link to 9/11 Attacks (Turn to Islam, 20 May 2011)

Lawsuit Reportedly Alleges Iranian Complicity in 9/11 Attacks (Fox News, 20 May 2011)

Glenn Beck Compares Obama And The Left To 1930s Nazi Appeasers (mediaite, 18 May 2011)

Beck Goes To Jerusalem (The American Conservative, 17 May 2011)

China Official Eyes Nazi ‘Database' Idea (The Tibet Post, 22 February 2011)

Cyber-Virus Proliferation: USG as “Main Enemy”

07 Other Atrocities, IO Impotency, Officers Call
DefDog Recommends....

Shows that the Pentagon does not understand Cyber Warfare…..for example, when a virus is unleashed it can no longer be controlled – the epitome of collateral damage…

Cyber-weapons developed by Pentagon to enter online warfare soon

By IB Times Staff Reporter | June 1, 2011 6:05 AM EDT

International Business Times

The Pentagon has designed a list of cyber weapons which include viruses that can disrupt important networks belonging to the enemy, a report in the Washington Post said.

Read full article….

Phi Beta Iota: This is criminally insane.  An honest president and Congress should go to ALL STOP on this idiocy, while implementing the original 1994 Sounding the Alarm suggestions.

Pentagon Creates New Excuse for Waging War

07 Other Atrocities, 10 Security, 11 Society, Computer/online security, Corruption, Cultural Intelligence, Government, InfoOps (IO), IO Impotency, Military, Misinformation & Propaganda, Power Behind-the-Scenes/Special Interests, Technologies
DefDog Recommends....

Pogo reigns supreme…..

Pentagon Will Consider Cyberattacks Acts of War

By and

New York Times, May 31, 2011

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon, trying to create a formal strategy to deter cyberattacks on the United States, plans to issue a new strategy soon declaring that a computer attack from a foreign nation can be considered an act of war that may result in a military response.

Read rest of article…

Phi Beta Iota: These people literally have no clue and are simply striving for budget share before Pentagon right-sizing gets underway.  We absolutely guarantee that what the Pentagon and the US Intelligence Community do to their own employees every day (including forbidding thumb drives now) qualifies as a crime against humanity as well as an act of war.  The USG is its own worst enemy in every possible sense.

See Also:

2011 Cyber-Command or IO 21 + IO Roots

Bob Gates, Chief Maintenance Clerk, Talks Crap — and the Wall Street Journal Goes Along…

Defense and the Deficit–Busting the Defense Bubble, Ending Defense Entitlement

Reference: The Pentagon Labyrinth

Review (Guest): The Pentagon Labyrinth

Review: Grand Theft Pentagon–Tales of Corruption and Profiteering in the War on Terror

Search: cost of corruption + Corruption RECAP

US Arms Industry Bleeding Secrets–This Is Not New

02 China, 03 Economy, 04 Inter-State Conflict, 06 Russia, 08 Wild Cards, 10 Security, 10 Transnational Crime, Advanced Cyber/IO, Commerce, Corruption, Government, IO Impotency, Military, Peace Intelligence
DefDog Recommends....

U.S. arms makers said to be bleeding secrets to cyber foes

By Jim Wolf

WASHINGTON | Tue May 31, 2011

(Reuters) – Top Pentagon contractors have been bleeding secrets for years as a result of penetrations of their computer networks, current and former national security officials say.

Read full article….

Phi Beta Iota: This is not new.  This is just recycled crap from the White House, desperate as it is to find new enemies as well as new excuses for why our bloated weapons and mobility systems do not work.  Just as DoD has known for over a decade that its drone videos were in the clear and could be picked up at will by anyone on the ground, so also DoD has known since at least 1992 that the DoD grid is hopeless, and the contractors don't really have a clue about how to keep a secret.  It is all theater–the decision was made in the 1990's to be IRRESPONSIBLE and they are sticking to that.  We are quite sure that the Israelis, French, and Germans are far more intrusive than the Russians and Chinese and that Iran is NOT a major player in probing US military-industrial systems–they rely on the CIA to give them nuclear weaponization plans.  We are equally certain that most of what the cyber-spies find they use as an example of what NOT to waste  money on.  China has used its time and energy wisely–they can now incapacitate any US system with electromagnetic neutralization.  Sucks for the USG, but probably a good thing for the US public.

See Also:

1994 Sounding the Alarm on Cyber-Security

Continue reading “US Arms Industry Bleeding Secrets–This Is Not New”

noble gold